Top

Korea’s crypto exchanges resume charging fees, shifting market shares

Markets·March 04, 2024, 8:19 AM

Korea’s prominent crypto exchanges Bithumb and Korbit have recently resumed charging trading fees, local media outlet Edaily reported. However, these changes in fee policies are reinforcing Upbit’s dominant market position while downsizing Bithumb’s and Korbit’s market shares. Meanwhile, the local banks affiliated with crypto exchanges are benefitting from an uptick in fee revenue from the recent bitcoin boom.

 

According to crypto data intelligence platform CoinGecko on Feb. 28, Upbit accounted for 77.4% of the local market share in crypto transactions, followed by Bithumb (20.43%), Coinone (1.73%), Korbit (0.35%) and Gopax (0.09%). 

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/1c1710e2deb775a95dca0ad81d43423a.webp
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash

Shifts in market shares

As of March 2, the market shares of Bithumb and Korbit decreased by 8.59 percentage points and 0.21 percentage points, respectively. Conversely, Upbit’s dominance grew to 86.57%, up by over 9 percentage points.

 

A Korbit official said it’s too early to pass judgment on Korbit’s market performance, as the exchange’s policies on trading fees could change depending on the market sentiment. The person added that CoinGecko tracks only eight types of tokens traded on Korbit and does not cover all the transactions on the exchange. 

 

Bithumb had previously benefited from charging no fees, driving up its market share to as high as over 40% in December. Following the decision to impose a fee of 0.04% on Feb. 6, however, the exchange has been experiencing a drop in transaction volume.

 

Korbit also reinstated trading fees last Thursday, roughly four months after eliminating them on Oct. 10 as a promotional move. However, it's worth mentioning that the newly introduced trading fee is 0.07%, which is lower than the earlier rate of 0.2%.

 

Meanwhile, Gopax currently exempts fees for users who trade BTC, ETH, XRP and USDC. 

 

No local regulations on fees for crypto transactions 

At the moment, there are no local regulations on fees for crypto transactions, leaving the task of setting such fees to individual trading platforms. It is known that crypto exchanges in other countries, such as the U.S., set their own rates as well. 

 

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Jul 06, 2023

UAE’s RAK DAO Partners with HBAR Foundation to Support Web3 Startups

UAE’s RAK DAO Partners with HBAR Foundation to Support Web3 StartupsRAK Digital Assets Oasis (RAK DAO), the world’s first free zone dedicated to digital and virtual asset companies located within the United Arab Emirates (UAE), has announced a collaboration with the HBAR Foundation which aims to provide growth and funding opportunities to members of the free zone.Leveraging blockchain technologyThe Cayman Islands-based HBAR Foundation, the project team behind the Hedera public ledger, will assist RAK DAO members in leveraging cutting-edge technologies, including blockchain, and building economies and applications on Hedera.In a joint statement released on Tuesday, the partners outlined the benefits of the collaboration, which include a grant program, financial backing processes, and specialized expert support in technology, marketing, and business development. They also aim to support the scaling of adoption and innovation of new ideas in the Web3 space.Photo by Mostafa Ashraf Mostafa on UnsplashRas Al Khaimah free zoneSheikh Mohammed bin Humaid Al Qasimi, Chairman of RAK Digital Assets Oasis, expressed his excitement about the partnership, stating: “Together, we are unlocking a world of new possibilities, empowering entrepreneurs, and propelling innovation forward. This collaboration is a testament to our shared commitment to driving sustainable growth and shaping a future where Ras Al Khaimah emerges as a global leader in the digital economy.”Ras Al Khaimah is the largest city within the Emirate of the same name. It’s the sixth largest city in the UAE and home to the RAK DAO free zone.In March, Ras Al Khaimah enacted a law to establish RAK Digital Assets Oasis, demonstrating its commitment to diversification, attracting new businesses, and positioning itself as a global tech center. The free zone is exclusively focused on digital and virtual asset companies operating in various sectors such as the metaverse, blockchain, utility tokens, virtual asset wallets, non-fungible tokens, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), decentralized applications, and other Web3-related businesses.Various initiativesAs part of the collaboration, RAK Digital Assets Oasis and HBAR Foundation will undertake several initiatives, including start-up and scale-up pitching sessions, opportunities for partners and investors to connect, and exploration of joint projects such as venture studios or accelerators. Grantees of the HBAR Foundation will also benefit from discounted set-up and licensing packages to establish their presence within RAK Digital Assets Oasis.Shayne Higdon, CEO of HBAR Foundation, acknowledged the UAE’s reputation as a dynamic hub for Web3 innovation and its ability to attract global enterprises and top-tier talent. Higdon stated: “Through this exclusive relationship we are honored to provide grantees with greater access to the UAE while working together to establish RAK Digital Assets Oasis as a major hub for the Web3 and digital assets sector.”The UAE has been actively investing in its infrastructure and implementing policy reforms to attract more entrepreneurs and businesses, aiming to grow its non-oil sector. The country’s digital economy is projected to surpass $140 billion by 2031, up from nearly $38 billion at present, according to a report by the Dubai Chamber of Digital Economy in February.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Sep 26, 2023

Upbit Reassures Investors Following False APT Token Deposits

Upbit Reassures Investors Following False APT Token DepositsFollowing a recent situation where false Aptos (APT) tokens were mistakenly accepted as authentic deposits, Upbit, South Korea’s leading cryptocurrency exchange, has reassured investors that such problems will not recur.Photo by Markus Spiske on UnsplashIrregular Aptos token depositsAn Upbit representative informed local news outlet Digital Asset that the platform had detected irregular deposit activities related to Aptos-based tokens of the same type on September 24. In response, the platform addressed the coding anomalies during the suspension of APT deposits and withdrawals.Software correctionThe representative said that, as the resumption of APT deposits and withdrawals took place at 23:00 KST on September 24 after the software correction, no virtual assets on the exchange, including APT, should face similar issues in the future.Asset monitoringThe official highlighted that the trading platform employs a real-time process that monitors and compares customer assets with on-chain assets, a step that contributed to the mitigation of the fallout from the incident.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Apr 21, 2023

Hong Kong Deems Crypto as Property

Hong Kong Deems Crypto as PropertyIn dealing with a case involving defunct Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency exchange Gatecoin, a Hong Kong judge has determined cryptocurrency as being property “capable of being held in trust.” Presiding over the case, Justice Linda Chan stated recently that Hong Kong takes a broad definition of what constitutes property.©Pexels/mitbg000Digital assets held in trustHaving expended efforts to try and recover funds from a former payments service provider that the company had partnered with, Gatecoin announced that it would shut down the business and commence the liquidation of the business in 2019. With bankruptcy proceedings being notoriously slow, that process continues today, resulting in Justice Chan’s recent determination.The notion of property held in trust is a common theme that has been explored in a number of cryptocurrency business bankruptcy processes recently, including the BlockFi, Celsius and FTX processes.Gatecoin has not proven to be any different in this regard. Liquidators had turned to the Hong Kong courts for direction as to how creditors’ digital assets, as held on the platform, should be defined. If property is deemed to have been held “in trust”, then that determination has implications for the owner of those assets relative to the bankruptcy proceedings.In the case of BlockFi, a determination was made in a US court that those who had simply custodied digital assets with the platform without earning any yield were property owners and that they should have their assets returned.The importance of Terms of Service (ToS)Alex Mashinsky, the founder and CEO of failed crypto lending competitor Celsius outlined to service users on a number of occasions that the assets remained their property even though his company used customer assets for various trading activities. The bankruptcy judge reached a different determination based on the terms of service. Service users had acknowledged in signing off on Celsius’ terms of service that assets held on the platform that accessed yield-bearing products became the property of Celsius when deposited within those products on the Celsius platform.Although it has not been dealt with yet, 1.4 million creditors relative to the bankruptcy process of failed cryptocurrency exchange FTX are likely to discover later this year if they can claim “in trust” property rights. An ad hoc group of creditors has taken legal action for the return of their digital assets on the basis of an assertion that the assets remained their property when transferred onto the platform.ImplicationsWhilst a seemingly uninteresting determination to anyone less informed about such bankruptcy proceedings, such decisions can have profound consequences. In a bankruptcy process, there is a hierarchy of creditors, with some having greater rights than others when it comes to the distribution of bankruptcy estate funds. Recognition of assets being held in trust as property would likely take those property owners out of the bankruptcy process, allowing the return of their funds (where available) while others who are classified as creditors get a distribution of whatever funds are left in the bankruptcy estate thereafter.Additional complexityGatecoin’s case was further complicated by the existence of various sets of terms of service. In two of the three instances, the court found that no trust language existed. There is one subset of creditors who may have the ability to claim their digital assets as property. The liquidators have agreed to identify them and contact them in that regard.While the process may be proving to be a minefield for Gatecoin’s creditors, it has served a broader purpose in crypto more generally as it has provided yet another opportunity for another jurisdiction, in this instance Hong Kong, to provide some more clarity with regard to the legal status and standing of cryptocurrency.

news
Loading