Top

South Koreans warm to stablecoins as interest surges, but central bank urges caution

Policy & Regulation·October 15, 2025, 6:57 AM

South Korea is moving closer to the global stablecoin trend as public curiosity and real-world trials accelerate, even as the country’s central bank signals it wants tight guardrails.

 

A recent analysis from Shinhan Card, reported by Money Today, finds that internet searches for “stablecoin” in South Korea jumped 403% in the first half of this year compared with the previous six months, based on data from major portals such as Google and Naver. Mentions on social media rose 359% over the same period. The spike reflects growing expectations that U.S. dollar-pegged tokens could make cross-border payments faster and cheaper by enabling near-instant settlement at prevailing foreign-exchange rates.

 

Interest has been reinforced by user reviews of actual payment experiences, which climbed between May and July. Crypto-linked cards, including RedotPay and Bybit’s offerings, are already usable domestically and allow top-ups with leading stablecoins such as USDT and USDC. One user described buying a cup of coffee at a local shop with a RedotPay card via Apple Pay. The small purchase underscores how crypto rails are edging into routine spending.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/d97517d1e46f023b776a4d4ab7b20b17.webp
Photo by Oat Appleseed on Unsplash

From curiosity to checkout

Trading venues remain the main arena. According to CryptoQuant, transactions in USDT and USDC on the country’s five leading exchanges totaled nearly $71 billion from January through August, underscoring stablecoins’ central role in crypto liquidity and price discovery.

 

Stablecoin interest in Korea shows a skew toward younger users and men, with men making up 74% of related searches and women 26%. By age, people in their 20s–40s accounted for 66% of searches, while those aged 50 and above represented 34%.

 

Public debate is widening alongside adoption, with some online commenters predicting that stablecoins could chip away at the influence of traditional card networks. At the same time, banks, card companies, and exchanges are bracing for the arrival of a won-pegged counterpart, as the government and parliament prepare a regulatory framework and aim to introduce a bill as early as this month. Domestic card issuers, drawing on their merchant networks and settlement systems, are already exploring how to integrate won-backed tokens in ways that maximize convenience and scalability.

 

Adoption meets skepticism

Skeptics counter that Korea’s existing payments infrastructure is already world-class, leaving only marginal gains for a won stablecoin. They also argue that cross-border benefits would be modest because the won lacks reserve-currency status and broad global demand.

 

The Bank of Korea (BOK) has struck a notably conservative tone. Governor Rhee Chang-yong has previously questioned the benefits of a won-denominated stablecoin and warned of risks to the monetary system. Earlier this month, in documents submitted to a lawmaker and reported by The Herald Business, the BOK advised that parliament consider granting it authority to require issuers to deposit reserves at the central bank when necessary. According to the bank, such a measure would strengthen user protection during heavy redemptions, curb money-supply growth outside its control, and ensure that any seigniorage benefits flow to the public.

 

That approach could reduce issuer profits, since deposits at the BOK would not earn interest, just as is the case for commercial banks. The documents also recommend sizing reserves to match the total stablecoin supply, while clarifying that not all of it would necessarily need to be held at the central bank.

 

Issuance path and next steps

As for who should issue a won-pegged token, the BOK favors starting with a consortium of banks, citing their track record on compliance and the need for a controlled pilot that lets regulators assess and mitigate risks before widening access.

 

The developments suggest a country exploring how stablecoins might integrate into an already sophisticated payments network. Consumers are showing interest, exchanges are handling large flows, and regulators are shaping the legal framework that will define the place of any future won-based digital currency.

 

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 25, 2023

Calls for Regulation of Crypto Investment Management Firms Amidst Growing Concerns

Calls for Regulation of Crypto Investment Management Firms Amidst Growing ConcernsThere have been recent calls in South Korea for crypto investment management companies to be subject to the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act amidst concerns about potential regulatory blind spots negatively impacting crypto investors.Photo by Conny Schneider on UnsplashPushing for regulatory oversightKang Seong-hoo, chairman of the Korea Digital Asset Business Association (KDA) went into detail regarding the issue during a forum held by the association on Thursday to discuss the efficient use of technology and safety management in the era of the digital economy.He emphasized that dealings related to virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, and staking must be regulated by authorities under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act. This is due to the fact that crypto investment management companies are not within the purview of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information or the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, the latter of which is set to take effect next year.The Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information defines financial companies as those that provide services for selling, buying, exchanging, transferring, keeping, or managing virtual assets; or act as a broker, intermediary, or agent for these services. However, there is no mention of crypto management companies.Echoes of past crypto platform controversiesThese concerns are driven by the looming possibility of another debacle like the class-action lawsuits against crypto platforms like Haru Invest or Delio arising again as a result of regulatory gray areas. Two months ago, investors had filed a legal complaint after the two lenders unexpectedly suspended customer deposits and withdrawals, claiming that they suffered around KRW 50 billion (approximately $39 million at the time of the incident) in damages as a result.Furthermore, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), a division under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), recently stated in a report that virtual asset deposits, lending, and DeFi services do not fall under the obligations of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information.“Given the context of the ongoing crypto winter since last year, the business model of virtual asset management companies, which is heavily reliant on arbitrage between exchanges, poses a high risk of incidents similar to the Haru Invest and Delio cases,” said Chairman Kang.“In order to ensure virtual asset user protection and market safety, authorities should promptly explore regulatory measures under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act for virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, staking, and the like.”

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jan 03, 2024

Indian Web3 industry body campaigned for ‘level playing field’

An industry advocacy body for crypto and Web3 in India had urged the Indian government to take action against nine offshore exchanges, prompting the government to issue show cause notices and block URLs recently. Native industry pushbackAccording to CoinDesk, the publication has seen a copy of a letter that was sent in mid-December by the Bharat Web3 Association (BWA), addressed to the Indian Finance Ministry’s Department of Revenue Secretary, Sanjay Malhotra. The letter was penned by BWA Chairman Dilip Chenoy. Chenoy has been in the role since March of last year having a number of years of leadership experience within Indian industry bodies under his belt, with time spent previously as Secretary General of the Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry and as Chairman of the board of Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology. According to its LinkedIn profile, the BWA seeks to “advocate for the collaboration between the regulatory bodies and the Industry for creating awareness about the new age technology and the emerging [Web3/crypto] asset class.” ‘Show cause’ noticesIt emerged last week that India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) had issued “compliance show-cause” notices to a number of overseas crypto platforms who have otherwise been active within the Indian market. The FIU is a national body tasked with liaising with and providing information to enforcement agencies where suspected illicit transactions are concerned. The offshore exchanges, including Binance, KuCoin, Huobi, Kraken, Gate.io, Bittrex, Bitstamp, MEXC Global and Bitfinex, have been given a two-week deadline to respond to the show cause notice. This notice questions why regulatory actions should not be taken against them, aiming to ensure compliance with the country's financial regulations. It’s understood that the BWA's letter requested a one-month grace period for offshore exchanges to register with the FIU. It remains unclear whether the government's actions were solely prompted by the BWA's letter or if it would have taken place independently. Notably, the BWA's letter aligns with the government's earlier mandate in March, requiring crypto businesses to register with the FIU and adhere to anti-money laundering processes under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Since then, 31 domestic entities have registered with the FIU. Photo by Peter Glaser on UnsplashEnsuring a fair gameThe BWA's letter also proposes that offshore exchanges establish an Indian subsidiary, deposit the applicable tax deducted at source (TDS) from July 1, 2022 and face restrictions, including potential access blocks on mobile app stores and IP addresses, for non-compliance. While it's unclear if all these requests feature in the show cause notices, the BWA emphasizes the need for fair competition. Rajagopal Menon, Vice President of leading Indian crypto exchange WazirX, stressed that “all we are asking for is a level playing field." The BWA's letter also urges the government to grant Indian retailers a 30-day window to withdraw assets before implementing any restrictions. The fledgling BWA industry body recently celebrated its first anniversary with its founding member, CoinSwitch founder Ashish Singhal, stating that he got involved with the BWA “to help build an effective regulatory framework for Web3 and digital assets in India.” Singhal added that the BWA’s mission is “to help India realize its vision to be the leading digital economy.” 

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jan 03, 2025

INDODAX snags full licensing in Indonesia

INDODAX, Indonesia’s largest virtual asset trading platform by trading volume, has acquired full licensing in Indonesia from the local regulator. That’s according to a report published by local media outlet VOI. The license, a Physical Crypto Asset Trader (PFAK) license, has been awarded to the company by Indonesia’s Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Agency, better known as BAPPEBTI.  The license will place INDODAX in a complaint position within the Indonesian market, relative to local regulations. The business has been issued certificate number 10/BAPPEBTI/PFAK/12/2024 by the regulator, its approval certificate as a Physical Crypto Asset Trader.Photo by Mark König on UnsplashMandatory registration requirementIn December 2023 the authorities in Indonesia set out a mandatory requirement for crypto trading entities to register with the Commodity Future Exchange (CFX). CFX is Indonesia’s national crypto bourse, while INDODAX is a member. As of April 2024, 35 crypto exchanges had been registered with the regulator. CFX has been given the mandate to monitor crypto exchange operations, to safeguard investors by ensuring exchanges abide by local regulations. Fendy Tan, chief financial officer (CFO) at INDODAX commented on the firm’s recent licensing milestone, stating: "We are grateful to BAPPEBTI and CFX for the trust given through this full license. The long process that must be passed reflects our commitment to providing the best protection for users. The license number 10 also has a special meaning, which symbolizes perfection, and symbolizes the 10-year journey of INDODAX in leading the crypto industry in Indonesia."  Liquidity and SOP requirementsIn order to acquire this license INDODAX had to comply with BAPPEBTI Regulation Number 8 of 2021 and Number 13 of 2022. It has also had to ensure a minimum paid-up capital of 100 billion Indonesian Rupiahs ($6,158,000), and a minimum equity of IDR 50 billion ($3,079,000). Furthermore, the company has had to implement a set of standard operating procedures (SOPs), together with achieving ISO certification in accordance with global security standards, with specific emphasis on complying with regulations to safeguard customer funds according to the balances held on account of fiat currency and digital assets by INDODAX customers. INDODAX is understood to have 7.1 million customers while a transaction volume of 109 trillion Indonesian rupiahs was reached for the period January to November 2024. BAPPEBTI had extended a deadline for the crypto licensing of exchanges late last year, a move welcomed at the time by INDODAX CEO Oscar Darmawan. Darmawan said that the move would strengthen the industry by ensuring that market participants were compliant with recently introduced regulations. While this licensing milestone is a positive for INDODAX, the firm had faced challenges in 2024. In September it emerged that the platform had been compromised with the loss of around $18 million in digital assets. Meanwhile, the authorities in Indonesia had planned to switch crypto market oversight from BAPPEBTI to the Financial Services Authority (OJK) by Jan. 12. However, a recent report published by the Jakarta Globe suggests that the Indonesian government has yet to finalize this regulatory transfer.

news
Loading