3AC Liquidators Pursue $1.3 Billion from Founders

Binance Headlines List of Japan FSA Warning Letter RecipientsJapan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) issued a warning letter on Friday stating that several foreign cryptocurrency exchanges have been operating in the country without proper registration, thereby infringing Japan’s fund settlement laws. The regulatory authority specifically named Binance, Bybit, MEXC Global, and Bitget as the entities in question.The FSA indicated that these exchanges need to register with the agency to continue operating in Japan. Failure to comply with the registration requirements would result in enforcement actions by the FSA, which could include the suspension of their operations in the country.©Pexels/David DibertUnregistered digital asset exchangesThe FSA’s warning letter detailed that the cryptocurrency exchanges mentioned had contravened Japan’s fund settlement regulations by engaging in crypto asset exchange operations without proper registration. The regulatory body emphasized that the current list of unregistered traders may not accurately reflect the current state of unregistered businesses in the country.The FSA intends to continue monitoring the market and taking appropriate regulatory measures to protect consumers and the integrity of the financial system. The agency also encouraged all unregistered operators to register with the FSA to avoid any possible enforcement actions.Clamping down on unregistered exchangesThe FSA’s recent action against unregistered cryptocurrency exchanges is in line with the regulatory body’s ongoing efforts to clamp down on non-compliant operators in Japan. In 2020, the FSA introduced new regulations mandating that all crypto exchanges must register with the agency and obtain a license to operate in the country. These regulations were put in place to strengthen consumer protection and enhance the transparency of the cryptocurrency market. By taking these measures, the FSA aims to foster a more stable and secure environment for the burgeoning crypto industry in Japan.The FSA’s warning to Binance is indicative of the growing regulatory scrutiny that the cryptocurrency industry in Japan and other nations is currently facing. Regulators are increasingly concerned about the potential risks associated with unregulated cryptocurrency exchanges, such as fraud, money laundering, and market manipulation. As a result, many regulatory bodies are implementing stricter rules and guidelines to promote transparency, accountability, and consumer protection in the cryptocurrency market.These regulations aim to create a more secure and reliable environment for investors and industry participants. The FSA’s actions against Binance serve as a reminder to all market players that compliance with regulatory requirements is critical for the long-term success of the cryptocurrency industry.Global regulatory variationWhile Japan is taking steps to implement new regulations for the cryptocurrency and Web3 sectors, the country has not been as stringent in its approach as some other major economies, such as the United States. However, this does not mean that regulators in Japan are not actively monitoring the industry and taking appropriate action where necessary.One example of such action is the recent lawsuit filed by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission against the popular crypto exchange firm, Binance, and its founder, Changpeng Zhao, over regulatory violations. This highlights the fact that regulatory bodies in different parts of the world are taking a more proactive approach to monitoring the cryptocurrency industry.Moreover, the FSA in Japan issued a formal warning letter to Binance in 2021 for operating without the necessary permissions. This is an indication that the regulatory landscape in Japan is evolving, and that crypto exchanges must comply with the relevant regulations to avoid potential legal repercussions. While the severity of regulatory measures may differ across different jurisdictions, the message is clear: compliance is crucial for the long-term viability of the cryptocurrency industry.

South Korea is weighing a fiat-backed stablecoin, balancing monetary sovereignty against the fact that global stablecoins are dominated by the U.S. dollar while domestic payments are already near-instant.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashThin domestic need despite sovereignty aimsThe case for a won-pegged token is facing challenging headwinds. As a recent Korea Economic Daily report highlighted, skeptics argue the won's limited global demand and lack of reserve currency status would curb its adoption internationally. Domestically, the need is even less apparent. A study by NH Investment & Securities noted that with retail payments settling in seconds via biometrics or passwords, and with world-leading credit card and bank account penetration, the efficiency gains from a stablecoin are marginal at best. Despite this, the appeal of digital currencies is growing. Transactions in dollar-backed stablecoins USDT and USDC on Korea’s five main exchanges totaled nearly $71 billion between January and August, according to CryptoQuant. This rising adoption presents both an opportunity and a threat. While some analysts believe stablecoins could smooth exchange-rate volatility, the Bank of Korea (BOK) has expressed concern. In a recent working paper, Son Min-kyu of the central bank commented that the widespread use of dollar-backed stablecoins could entrench the dollar's dominance, while also amplifying run risk and market volatility in Treasuries during periods of stress. Scarce short-term collateralSeoul also faces a unique structural hurdle: a shortage of short-term government bonds to use as collateral. Unlike the U.S., where stablecoin issuers rely on a deep market for Treasury bills, Korea’s bond market is dominated by long-dated paper. Kim Pil-kyu of the Korea Capital Market Institute (KCMI) described short-term sovereign bills as vital for a stablecoin’s value preservation, a resource Korea currently lacks. As South Korea deliberates, other major economies are forging ahead on divergent paths. Japan is moving to authorize privately issued stablecoins this fall, while the European Union has brought them under its comprehensive Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. UK’s cap plan clashes with pro-innovation pushThis regulatory balancing act is also playing out in the U.K., where a policy rift is emerging. According to the Financial Times, the Bank of England has proposed capping individual holdings of widely used stablecoins at £10,000–£20,000, with a £10 million limit for businesses. Industry groups argue the plan would be expensive to implement and could blunt the U.K.’s competitive edge in digital finance. The central bank's caution also contrasts with the government's pro-innovation stance, with finance minister Rachel Reeves recently pledging to promote the use of stablecoins and tokenized securities. For Seoul, the global shift toward tokenized money is undeniable. With seemingly limited domestic demand and various structural challenges, a won-backed stablecoin is, for now, an idea worth watching as the broader financial landscape evolves. 

HKX management has advised Hong Kong resident users of the platform to withdraw assets following the company’s decision to halt operations in Hong Kong.  The company publicized its decision on July 18, making the following statement on its website: “We would like to inform you that our management team has, after careful consideration, decided to withdraw our application for the Type 1 and Type 7 licenses under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) and the virtual asset service provider license under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (Cap. 615).”Photo by Zhe ZHANG on UnsplashCompliance strugglesHKX’s exit from Hong Kong is the latest in a series of crypto exchange withdrawals from the Chinese autonomous territory. Other exchanges such as OKX, KuCoin, Gate.io and Binance had all bowed out back in May.  HKX initially applied for a Hong Kong license in February. However, like many others, the exchange failed to comply with Hong Kong’s regulatory requirements. While Hong Kong has been making a concerted effort to establish a regulatory framework and licensing system in order to create the conditions for it to become a crypto hub, it has also been grappling with making regulations strict enough to stamp out fraud in the wake of the JPEX exchange scandal. With that, it appears that many exchanges are finding the regulatory requirements difficult to live with. Originally, 24 exchanges had applied for a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license. As it stands today, 12 of those original applicants have dropped out, with one more having its application returned with no clarity emerging as to the reason why. HKX has suspended new user registrations. The company’s management has not suggested that they will reapply for a license and reboot the service at a later stage. The company had flagged its intentions back in May, suspending trading and deposit services on May 29. OKX announced on May 24 that it was withdrawing from the Hong Kong market, citing a review of its business strategy. Around the same timeframe, Gate.io withdrew from the market in Hong Kong having failed to achieve compliance in accordance with the new licensing requirements.  Notwithstanding that outcome, the firm suggested that it planned to revamp its platform in line with the Chinese autonomous territory’s licensing requirements, and return to the market once that had been achieved. In a notice posted to its website on May 22, it stated: “Gate.HK is actively working on the aforementioned overhaul. We plan to resume our business in Hong Kong in the future and contribute to the virtual asset ecosystem after obtaining the relevant licenses.” That overhaul has yet to be completed as right now, the platform only allows the withdrawal of funds by its previous Hong Kong-based customers. Back in May 2023, Eddie Yue, the CEO of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, suggested that there would be no light touch regulation in Hong Kong. HashKey Exchange, alongside OSL, was the first business to secure licensing under the new framework. In April, HasKey CEO Livio Weng told the Financial Times that these regulations block access to overseas investors while the local market in Hong Kong isn’t very big. It emerged in recent weeks that Hong Kong regulators are reviewing whether crypto regulation is “excessively stringent.”