UAE’s RAK DAO Partners with HBAR Foundation to Support Web3 Startups

Bgin Blockchain Limited, a crypto mining equipment manufacturer headquartered in Singapore, filed documentation last Friday with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with a view towards launching an initial public offering (IPO) in the U.S. The Feb. 21 filing, a Form F-1 registration statement, outlines that the company wishes to go forward with the IPO after the effective date of the filing has been established. Bgin identified itself as an “emerging growth company.”  The registration statement was filed on behalf of Bgin by Hunter Taubman Fischer & Li LLC, in conjunction with the underwriters represented by Robinson & Cole LLP. It proposes to offer the U.S. investing public 59.54 million Class A ordinary shares and 15.69 million Class B shares. As part of its plan, Class A shares would be listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange using “BGIN” as the ticker symbol.Photo by Leslie Lopez Holder on Unsplash$50 million raiseIn a statement published on Renaissance Capital's website, the independent investment bank outlined that Bgin is seeking to raise $50 million in capital through the IPO.  It’s understood that funds raised by way of the IPO will be utilized to ramp up research and development efforts. The bookrunners, responsible for managing the IPO, are Chardan Capital Markets and The Benchmark Company. As yet, no information has been provided with regard to how Bgin will price its share offering. Renaissance described Bgin as a digital asset technology company “with proprietary cryptocurrency mining technologies and a strategic focus on alternative cryptocurrencies.”  The company, founded in 2019, focuses on the design, manufacture and distribution of mining equipment relative to Kaspa (KAS), Alephium (ALPH) and Radiant (RXD) blockchain networks. Bgin supplies 8nm and 12nm ASIC chips dedicated to these alternative blockchain networks, which all depend on the use of a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism. Additionally, Bgin mines cryptocurrency itself while providing a hosting service for crypto mining, with facilities in the U.S. and Hong Kong. It hosts 4,020 mining rigs for customers, with 3,330 of these located within facilities in Iowa and Nebraska.  Across various subsidiaries Bgin manages 33,862 active mining rigs in the U.S. within its own mining operations. And additional 12,000 non-operational rigs are currently in storage facilities in the U.S. and Hong Kong. Over a 12-month period ending on June 30, 2024, the company recorded revenues of $392 million. In 2023, the firm recorded sales of 68,000 mining rigs. In H1 2024, the company sold over 47,000 mining machines. The filing disclosed that the company’s Hong Kong subsidiary was responsible for considerable crypto mining facilities in mainland China prior to China deeming the activity to be illegal in 2021. Providing full disclosure in the lead-up to its IPO, the firm warned that it continued to operate crypto mining facilities in China for a number of months in violation of that law. It identifies this item as a risk factor as potentially, the firm could be penalized and fined.

More Players Join NH Bank-Led Security Token Consortium in South KoreaMultiple South Korean banks and fractional investment firms are now joining the security token consortium led by NongHyup Bank (NH Bank), according to a report from local news outlet Etoday today.Expanding consortiumNH Bank announced today that the Industrial Bank of Korea, Shinhan Bank, and Woori Bank, along with fractional investment companies, will be participating in the banking sector’s security token consortium. This consortium was established in April and initially comprised NH Bank, Suhyup Bank, Jeonbuk Bank, and six fractional investment companies.The objective of the banking sector’s involvement in the consortium is to contribute to the security token industry by developing distributed ledger technology infrastructure, conducting research to promote security tokens, and strengthening investor protection.The consortium participants will engage in further discussions on how banks can participate in the security token market while adhering to evolving legislation related to security tokens. Additionally, they will explore methods to establish the necessary platforms required by fractional investment companies to issue security tokens.Photo by Mathieu Stern on UnsplashSecurity tokens as corporate bondsIn the long term, the group plans to issue security tokens as corporate bonds, taking inspiration from German tech company Siemens’ strategy, or create a secondary market for security tokens to promote the overall security token ecosystem. Earlier this year, Siemens issued a blockchain-based one-year bond worth 60 million euros ($64.9 million).The consortium’s new fractional investment firms include fractional real estate investment platform Funble, artificial intelligence entertainment firm Blade Ent, blockchain tech firm Trackchain, online bookstore Yes24’s fractional artwork ownership platform ARTiPIO, and electric vehicle (EV) charging sharing platform Charzin.

As cryptocurrencies increasingly position themselves as a recognized asset class and potential hedge against fiat inflation, illicit activity tied to digital tokens is becoming more visible. A recent high-profile case in the UK has brought this issue into sharp focus, centering on a fraud scheme originating in China. According to BBC News, the case involves Qian Zhimin, a woman who raised funds from more than 100,000 investors in China by claiming to operate a crypto mining company that also develops health products. Instead, she laundered the proceeds and fled the country. On Nov. 11, Qian was sentenced to 11 years and eight months in prison by a UK court.Photo by Vasilis Chatzopoulos on Unsplash$6B fraud and lavish lifestyle​Qian entered Britain on a forged passport in September 2017 and proceeded to live an extravagant lifestyle, renting a mansion in Hampstead for over £17,000 ($22,700) per month. She was arrested in northern England in April 2024, and it was found that she held roughly 61,000 Bitcoin, valued at roughly £5 billion ($6.6 billion), having converted portions of her holdings to cover her substantial living expenses. ​The sheer scale of her wealth was revealed after police searched her rented residence, discovering the Bitcoin reserves on hard drives and laptops. It marks the largest crypto seizure ever recorded in the UK. During the raid, officers also found four other individuals at the property illegally employed to handle household tasks such as shopping, cleaning, and security. ​Since Qian’s arrival in the UK, the value of her Bitcoin holdings has appreciated more than 20-fold. With the fraudster now sentenced, victims are seeing a glimmer of hope for restitution. A civil case scheduled for early next year will determine the fate of the seized assets. However, while many defrauded Chinese investors are reportedly preparing to file claims, establishing a clear paper trail may prove difficult. Many victims routed funds through local intermediaries rather than transferring them directly to Qian’s firm. ​U.S. Bitcoin forfeiture and Beijing’s allegationsWhile the UK courts grapple with the aftermath of Qian’s fraud, a separate crypto controversy is brewing between the U.S. and China, highlighting Beijing's continued vigilance over the sector despite its 2021 ban on trading and mining. According to Cointelegraph, the state-supported National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) has alleged that American authorities are connected to the disappearance of roughly 127,000 Bitcoin, valued at around $14.5 billion, from the LuBian mining pool. ​These allegations surfaced after the U.S. filed a civil forfeiture claim in October against Chen Zhi, the Cambodia-based founder of the Prince Group, who is believed to have owned the assets prior to the breach. At the time of the filing, the U.S. Treasury Department noted that the funds were already under its control. ​CVERC contends that Washington hasn't explained how it accessed the assets. Citing data from analytics firm Arkham, the Chinese agency suggested the funds had been under U.S. control for over a year. They argued that the prolonged inactivity of the Bitcoin before the formal seizure is inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers seeking quick profit, implying state-level involvement. Economic chess between Washington and BeijingThis matter of Bitcoin control adds a new layer of complexity to U.S.–China relations, even as a trade truce between the two countries took effect on Nov. 10. In a report by CNBC, Washington cut tariffs on China’s fentanyl-linked imports to 10% and extended a reciprocal rate reduction under that agreement. In exchange, Beijing is said to have eased certain restrictions on rare earth exports. Analysts at Morgan Stanley suggest that China is maintaining its export-control regime, implemented in April, to retain strategic leverage. They caution that recurring negotiations and strategic divergence will remain defining features of the evolving bilateral relationship.