Haechi Labs Joins Hands with Oasys for Entry into Japanese Market

Lotte’s NFT marketplace partners with upcycling brand NiUl for membership NFTsLotte Data Communication, an affiliate of South Korean retail conglomerate Lotte Group, issued a press release on Wednesday (local time) to reveal that its NFT marketplace, Kottonseed, has issued new non-fungible tokens (NFTs) in partnership with upcycling brand NiUl whose name stands for “Nothing is Useless.”Photo by MSA-90 on PixabayPlastic lids to stylish keychainsNiUl recycles discarded plastic lids, transforming them into vibrant, stylish key ring pendants known as NiUl rings. NiUl has successfully sold over 2,000 pendants across a mix of online and offline platforms, with 300 kilograms of plastic lids donated by supporters. In a strategic move to broaden its reach, the company has been partnering with diverse firms and ramping up its donation initiatives, targeting environment and fashion-conscious millennials and Generation Z consumers.In their latest venture with Kottonseed, these pendants have been digitized into membership NFTs, which come with a suite of benefits like a special edition rope strap and discounts on products. Some lucky members may even get the opportunity to be involved in creating a NiUl ring. These membership NFTs are being released in limited numbers and are up for grabs starting today on NiUl’s page on Smart Store, an e-commerce platform of popular search engine Naver.NFTs in five colorsThe NFTs are offered in five distinct colors, each named after the sky’s varying appearances: “Post-rain Clear,” “Blue Sky,” “Sunset,” “Aurora” and “Night Sky.”A spokesperson for Lotte Data Communication expressed that the company sees great value in participating in upcycling initiatives with NiUl through their NFT marketplace, Kottonseed. They are keen on pursuing enjoyable and varied collaborations to support NiUl’s socially beneficial endeavors. Moreover, Lotte is actively exploring ways in which NFTs can contribute to environmental, social and governance (ESG) objectives.

The blockchain network underpinning Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, requires an energy volume comparable to the annual consumption of Thailand. According to Digiconomist’s Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index, the protocol utilized roughly 204.44 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity between Nov. 18, 2024, and Nov. 18, 2025.Photo by Fré Sonneveld on UnsplashFiscal losses drive Malaysian oversightAmid these intense energy demands, Malaysia’s primary electricity utility has recorded substantial financial impairments attributed to illicit activities. Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) reported losses totaling 4.57 billion ringgit ($1.1 billion) from illegal crypto-mining operations over a five-year span. In a Nov. 19 report by The Edge Malaysia, the Ministry of Energy Transition and Water Transformation (Petra) disclosed these figures to parliament, specifying that the unauthorized mining occurred at 13,827 locations between 2020 and August of this year. To counter these infractions through regulatory channels, Petra has formed a special committee scheduled to convene before year-end. This body aims to recommend enhancements to the Electricity Supply Act, which currently delineates penalties based on the offender's classification. Domestic violators face fines ranging from 1,000 to 50,000 ringgit ($240 to $12,000), imprisonment of up to one year, or both. Penalties escalate for non-domestic entities, involving fines between 20,000 and one million ringgit ($480 to $240,000) and potential prison terms of up to five years. Despite these provisions regarding electricity theft, a specific legal code regulating the act of crypto mining remains absent, creating a jurisdictional void. International bans and grid reallocationStrategies to curtail electricity usage by crypto miners are becoming evident elsewhere in Southeast Asia as well. Laotian Deputy Energy Minister Chanthaboun Soukaloun told Reuters last month that the nation intends to suspend electricity supplies to crypto miners by early 2026. He cited the sector's minimal economic contribution and low job creation as primary factors. Consequently, the state plans to redirect power to high-priority sectors, including AI data centers, metals processing, and electric-vehicle manufacturing. Parallel restrictions are emerging globally. In October, the government of British Columbia enacted a permanent prohibition on new BC Hydro connections for crypto miners to safeguard the Canadian province’s energy reserves. Officials pointed to the industry’s "disproportionate energy consumption and limited economic benefit" as the rationale for the policy. The debate over thermal innovationConversely, some enterprises are exploring methods to capture thermal output from Bitcoin mining to heat residential and commercial properties. If viable, such repurposing could utilize the considerable thermal byproducts of mining. A K33 Research study cited by CNBC indicates the industry generates roughly 100 TWh of heat annually, a figure sufficient to warm the entirety of Finland. However, industry consensus on the feasibility of these applications remains elusive. Proponents suggest that mining infrastructure could be situated in proximity to heat consumers. Skeptics, however, contend that the reliance on application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips makes this impractical, arguing that the technical difficulty of mining a block renders household participation unfeasible. Despite these differing views, the concept continues to attract attention as a potential avenue for innovation in energy distribution. As jurisdictions like Malaysia and British Columbia tighten regulatory oversight, the cryptocurrency sector faces mounting pressure to address its energy footprint. The divergence between government restrictions and industry-led efficiency proposals underscores the complex relationship between digital asset infrastructure and global energy resources. Given the shifting landscape of policy and technology, the outlook for sustainable large-scale crypto mining remains uncertain, as governments weigh energy demands against economic benefits and the industry searches for more efficient ways to operate.

India Offers Suggestions in the Development of G20 Crypto GuidelinesIndia submitted its Presidency Note on Tuesday, contributing to the global framework for cryptocurrency regulation under the auspices of the G20, a forum comprising the world’s 20 largest economies.The document aligns itself with the guidance provided by prominent entities including the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).Photo by Swapnil Deshpandey on UnsplashKey Summit topicMany months in advance of September’s G20 Summit in New Delhi, it was clear that crypto regulation would be a key subject for discussion. The FSB’s guidelines, released in July, offer a comprehensive framework for regulating various crypto assets, particularly stablecoins, based on existing standards and principles. These guidelines encompass crucial aspects such as governance, risk management, disclosure, supervision, and cross-border collaboration.In May, the FSB’s Regional Consultative Group for Asia met in Cebu, in the Philippines. During that meeting, the FSB highlighted the risks implicated by digital assets.Published in June, the FATF guidelines put forth a universally applicable set of rules to combat money laundering and counter the risks of terrorist financing linked to cryptocurrencies. One of the main provisions is the “travel rule,” compelling crypto service providers to share customer information when conducting fund transfers.While the IMF guidelines are expected to be unveiled in August, they will encompass a synthesis paper that offers a comprehensive roadmap for crypto regulation. This roadmap is designed to reflect input from multiple stakeholders and jurisdictions.India’s supplementary additionsAmidst endorsing these global crypto guidelines, India also proposes supplementary additions, particularly highlighting the challenges faced by developing economies in the crypto realm. The document underlines that these nations may grapple with capacity and resource constraints when implementing effective crypto regulation and supervision.Furthermore, they might require more extensive access to reliable data regarding crypto activities and associated risks. Developing economies are also at a heightened risk of falling victim to illicit crypto use, including money laundering, tax evasion, and cyber-crime.In light of these concerns, India advocates for the inclusion of developing economy-specific considerations in the FSB’s guidelines. The country also urges for technical assistance and capacity-building support to be extended to these nations. Additionally, it proposes a global outreach initiative to raise awareness of the risks, commencing with nations experiencing higher levels of crypto adoption.Broadening the scopeAnother noteworthy suggestion from India is an extension of the regulatory approach beyond the G20’s scope, encompassing the broader digital economy. While recognizing that crypto is merely one facet of the sweeping digital transformation reshaping multiple sectors, India’s document underscores the need for enhanced cooperation and coordination among various stakeholders and authorities at both national and international levels.In this vein, India proposes that the G20 contemplate formulating a comprehensive framework for the digital economy. This framework should encompass a wide array of concerns, including data governance, digital taxation, digital identity, digital inclusion, and fostering digital innovation, according to the document.India’s exploration of diverse aspects related to cryptocurrency — ranging from legal status to taxation implications, central bank digital currency (CBDC) potential, and innovation possibilities — further underlines its desire to see greater international cohesion in relation to the regulation of digital assets.