Mystic Land token to be listed on LBank

Real-World Assets Emerge as a Beacon of Hope for the Blockchain Industry Amid Crypto WinterIn the midst of a crypto winter that has cast a shadow over the blockchain industry, a new opportunity has come to light — the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs), or tangible assets such as gold and real estate, on blockchain networks.Photo by Tierra Mallorca on UnsplashMajor blockchain companies and industry experts gathered at Klaytn Square Lounge 2023, a blockchain and Web3 event in Gangnam, southern Seoul on Monday to discuss how RWAs could overcome the limitations of the current blockchain market.The rise of RWAsRecently, platforms like RWA tokenization project Elysia and Klaytn Foundation have started to shift their attention to RWAs as a promising avenue in the blockchain market. According to a report by global consulting firm Boston Consulting Group, the total value of the global RWA market, which reached $310 billion last year, is projected to surge to a staggering $16 trillion by 2030.“During the ongoing crypto winter, we are witnessing not only new funds pouring into blockchain projects but also existing funds leaving the market. We see RWAs as a potential solution to this,” said Seo Sang-min, Representative Director at Klaytn Foundation.Seo went on to explain that currently, virtual assets dominate most of the assets on blockchain mainnets like Klaytn, but compared to RWAs such as gold, cash, and real estate, their scale is very small. “We need to expand the utility of RWAs by placing them on the blockchain. Once they are, transaction costs will significantly decrease, and anyone will be able to trade 24/7 worldwide,” he said.Other blockchain experts at the conference also shared this sentiment. “Tokenizing RWAs is crucial because it provides investment opportunities that do not require large sums of money or lengthy waiting periods,” Luc Falempin, CEO of Tokeny Solutions emphasized. Beyond tokenizing the assets themselves, legal contracts and information about the various stakeholders involved, such as asset issuers and investors, can be recorded and shared on the blockchain, which can prove to be very convenient for investors.Revolutionizing investmentAccording to Falempin, most derivative investments involve seeking investment opportunities, creating portfolios, and enduring complicated processes for recovering investment capital that can take over ten years to complete. Additionally, ordinary investors often struggle to raise the substantial funds required for investment, creating high entry barriers. Also, investment contracts were traditionally executed on paper, which is outdated and inconvenient. However, as blockchain technology enables the tokenization of assets, these processes become much simpler.“Through RWA-backed virtual assets, even dozens of individuals can easily participate in investment, eliminating the hassle of dealing with paperwork. Introducing blockchain as a new infrastructure allows all stakeholders to easily view relevant records within the blockchain network,” he stated.The role of DAOsSo, how can investment products like RWA tokens be effectively managed within the decentralized realm of blockchain? Yoon Kim, Chief Marketing Officer of Elysia, mentioned decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) as a fit solution.“DAOs are a realistic method that is crucial for implementing the RWA model effectively. All stakeholders within a DAO can make modifications and creations, providing an avenue for managing tokenized assets effectively without government intervention,” Kim said.Technical hurdlesHowever, RWA tokens face several technical challenges. RWA products, which integrate the real world with the blockchain realm, could suffer from the so-called oracle problem, which refers to the inherent inability of blockchains to access external data, leading to a lack of information transparency. Even if the assets are stable, their prices on the blockchain network may differ from those in the real market. Currently, there are no established technical solutions to address these issues.“Rather than getting directly involved, we aim to move in accordance with market prices, but also seek ways to minimize risks with the help of external entities in certain cases,” said James Lim, CEO of Creder.As the crypto winter persists, the blockchain industry is looking towards RWAs as a beacon of hope, offering the potential to bridge the gap between traditional assets and the decentralized world of blockchain, despite the challenges that lie ahead.

At the 16th Mint Annual BFSI Summit and Awards in Mumbai, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor Shaktikanta Das reiterated the central bank's cautious stance on cryptocurrencies, regardless of recent global developments. During the event, which was held on Thursday, Das took to the stage. He was asked if the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States gives legitimacy to cryptocurrency.Photo by rupixen.com on UnsplashUnwavering responseDas was unwavering in his response, maintaining that the RBI remains steadfast in its approach and opposition to cryptocurrencies. He stated: "The way we look at crypto remains unchanged, irrespective of who does what."  He emphasized that the RBI does not intend to emulate regulatory decisions made by other countries. Despite this global development, Das maintained the RBI's reservations, expressing concerns about the potential risks associated with venturing further into the cryptocurrency space. Favoring a crypto banLast month, officials from the Indian central bank told the Hindustan Times that the RBI believes that the Indian government should impose an outright ban on cryptocurrencies in India. One unnamed official stated:"The government cannot sidestep the RBI’s concerns while deciding on cryptocurrencies, as it is responsible for monetary stability in India and maintains price stability." Das acknowledged the potential of blockchain technology, the foundation of cryptocurrencies, highlighting its versatility for various applications. Both the central bank and the Indian government have encouraged the development of blockchain rather than crypto. Last year, an RBI-led initiative, the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), recruited blockchain expertise to further develop that project. However, he made it clear that the RBI's focus remains on strengthening governance and assurance in regulated entities, with an emphasis on early identification, close monitoring and effective management of risks. Citing ‘Tulipmania’Das cautioned against a “crypto mania,” drawing parallels to the historical tulipmania of the 17th century. He underscored the RBI's position that embracing cryptocurrencies could pose significant risks, echoing his previous warnings about the macroeconomic and financial stability risks associated with these digital assets. The governor emphasized the importance of instilling an appropriate risk culture within organizations, with active involvement from the board and senior management. Das stated that the RBI expects top officials and board members to play a more proactive role in risk management. India’s crypto community responded critically to the RBI governor’s comments. Ajeet Khurana, a Web3 growth investor, responded on social media, stating:”Dear RBI governor, I respect you a lot, and I don’t mind that you don’t like Crypto. Diverse points of view are healthy. Yet, using words like 'tulip mania' only gives the impression that you are out of touch with what is happening in Web3. My request, Sir, is that you update yourself.” Vivek Sen, the founder of Bitgrow Lab, wrote:”Dear RBI, First, don't club Bitcoin with ‘Crypto’. Secondly, Tulips did not experience an 80% drop on four occasions, and they recovered each time.”Despite opposition to cryptocurrencies in official circles in India, a report last year produced by Chainalysis found that India is leading the way in Asia in terms of grassroots adoption of cryptocurrencies. 

China’s GAPP proposes ban on gaming crypto token conversionChina’s gaming industry hit a significant speed bump on Friday as the General Administration of Press and Publication (GAPP) unveiled a draft proposing substantial changes to the regulation of in-game tokens, signaling a strategic shift in the country’s stance on digital currencies in gaming.Photo by blurrystock on UnsplashImplementing more stringent controlsThe proposed regulations by GAPP bring about a ban on the conversion of game tokens into physical goods or legal tender. These guidelines, spanning 64 articles, impose stringent requirements on gaming companies. These include mandatory licensing in China, a two-year data retention policy, adherence to national and socialist values in content and the eradication of anonymous user registrations.One significant aspect of the guidelines is Article 23, which specifically addresses the use of game tokens. It proposes restrictions on exchanging them for physical goods, services or legal tender.The regulatory landscape becomes more complex due to the ambiguity surrounding cryptocurrencies, which are not recognized as legal tender in China. Although a warning was issued about the risks inherent in non-fungible tokens (NFTs), they remain legal in China. NFTs feature prominently within blockchain-based gaming.Game providers are also confronted with new limitations on inducements, such as bonuses for registration or daily logins, and are mandated to implement measures against irrational consumer spending.Gaming sector falloutIn the wake of these developments, several Chinese tech giants experienced a significant market downturn in Hong Kong. Tencent, a global gaming powerhouse and one of China’s most valuable companies, saw a 12.4% drop on Friday, marking its worst day since October 2008. This decline erased a massive 367 billion Hong Kong dollars ($47 billion) from Tencent’s market value.NetEase, another gaming giant, witnessed a 25% dive in Hong Kong afternoon trade, recording its most substantial daily loss since its listing in June 2020. Additionally, Bilibili and Kuaishou, prominent players in video-sharing and short-video platforms, experienced declines of 9.7% and 7.2%, respectively, given their involvement in online gaming.Market uncertaintyWith this latest development, the future of gaming crypto tokens remains uncertain in China, with investor confidence having been hit hard. Putting the matter in context on Friday, Stansberry Research Analyst Brian Tycangco took to the X social media platform, stating:”Govt regulation will effectively render prevailing business models irrelevant due to uncertainty regarding monetization. Games are inherently reward-based and if you clamp down on the use of rewards/incentives, you turn an entire industry on its head.”The guidelines, open for public consultation until Jan. 22, 2024, have not yet been legally enacted. This time frame allows for feedback and potential adjustments before enforcement.Notably, the Web3 gaming sector has witnessed substantial activity, with approximately a million unique active wallets engaged daily over the past three months, according to DappRadar. Industry experts, including Yat Siu of Animoca Brands, anticipate a potential surge in user engagement, emphasizing the potential impact of these regulations on the gaming industry’s trajectory.