Sejong Telecom to Collaborate with KOREIT for Security Token Products

Calls for Regulation of Crypto Investment Management Firms Amidst Growing ConcernsThere have been recent calls in South Korea for crypto investment management companies to be subject to the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act amidst concerns about potential regulatory blind spots negatively impacting crypto investors.Photo by Conny Schneider on UnsplashPushing for regulatory oversightKang Seong-hoo, chairman of the Korea Digital Asset Business Association (KDA) went into detail regarding the issue during a forum held by the association on Thursday to discuss the efficient use of technology and safety management in the era of the digital economy.He emphasized that dealings related to virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, and staking must be regulated by authorities under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act. This is due to the fact that crypto investment management companies are not within the purview of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information or the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, the latter of which is set to take effect next year.The Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information defines financial companies as those that provide services for selling, buying, exchanging, transferring, keeping, or managing virtual assets; or act as a broker, intermediary, or agent for these services. However, there is no mention of crypto management companies.Echoes of past crypto platform controversiesThese concerns are driven by the looming possibility of another debacle like the class-action lawsuits against crypto platforms like Haru Invest or Delio arising again as a result of regulatory gray areas. Two months ago, investors had filed a legal complaint after the two lenders unexpectedly suspended customer deposits and withdrawals, claiming that they suffered around KRW 50 billion (approximately $39 million at the time of the incident) in damages as a result.Furthermore, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), a division under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), recently stated in a report that virtual asset deposits, lending, and DeFi services do not fall under the obligations of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information.“Given the context of the ongoing crypto winter since last year, the business model of virtual asset management companies, which is heavily reliant on arbitrage between exchanges, poses a high risk of incidents similar to the Haru Invest and Delio cases,” said Chairman Kang.“In order to ensure virtual asset user protection and market safety, authorities should promptly explore regulatory measures under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act for virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, staking, and the like.”

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) — an Indian law enforcement agency — seized 90 crores ($10.5 million) from an online scam app called E-Nuggets with the help of global crypto exchange Binance.  ED is the governmental law enforcement agency responsible for enforcing economic laws and with that, tackling economic crime. According to a report published by Indian English language daily newspaper The Hindu, the online gaming app E-Nugget had cryptocurrencies worth $10 million stored in 70 different crypto wallet accounts spread across the three crypto exchanges.  Local Indian exchanges ZebPay and WazirX also aided the ED in its investigations and subsequent actions. The ED contacted these exchanges to block the wallet addresses and transfer the crypto assets to the agency’s wallet. Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashCrypto assets seizedThe ED, tasked with upholding such financial crimes, spearheaded the operation against E-Nuggets, an online gaming platform masquerading as a legitimate investment opportunity. Taking to the X social media platform on April 30, the Indian law enforcement agency stated: “ED, Kolkata led a successful operation against a major “online gaming app scam” known as “E-Nugget”. The E-Nugget app, masqueraded as a gaming platform, promised users high returns on their investments. Crypto assets which were taken into possession of ED are transferred into Crypto Wallet of ED.” 70 wallets implicatedWith cryptocurrencies valued at $10 million spread across 70 different wallet accounts on three crypto exchanges, the agency swiftly took action. E-Nuggets enticed unsuspecting investors with promises of substantial returns through its purported gaming interface. However, once investments were made, the platform vanished into thin air, leaving users unable to recoup their funds. The ED's investigation revealed a complex web of deceit, with the agency seizing properties totaling over 163 crores ($19.5 million), comprising cash, cryptocurrency holdings, account balances and office spaces. The scam involved the funneling of funds into digital assets through 2,500 dummy bank accounts, resulting in the discovery of 19 crores ($2.2 million) in cash. A first information report (FIR) filed at the Park Street Police Station in Kolkata, became the catalyst that triggered the ED case that was subsequently registered under the provisions of India’s Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Masterminded by Aamir Khan, who was apprehended alongside accomplice Romen Agarwal, the scheme operated under the guise of digital transactions, which, ironically, facilitated its unraveling. Law enforcement agencies adeptly traced, froze and seized the illicit funds as they moved through the digital realm. Public ledger upends scammersCritics often point to the potential for cryptocurrency to facilitate money laundering. However, the inherent transparency of blockchain technology presents significant obstacles to such illicit activities. Notably, in the infamous 2016 Bitfinex hack, where hackers absconded with 119,756 Bitcoin, the culprits were eventually apprehended in 2022 while attempting to launder the stolen funds. The collaborative efforts between Binance, the ED, and local exchanges points to a developing commitment towards combating financial fraud within the cryptocurrency space. This wasn’t the first occasion in which Binance had cooperated with law enforcement on such matters. In October of last year, the company got with the Thai authorities to assist them in crushing a crypto-related scam. By leveraging blockchain's transparency and international cooperation, authorities can effectively dismantle illicit schemes, safeguarding investors and upholding the integrity of the digital asset ecosystem.

South Korea is weighing a fiat-backed stablecoin, balancing monetary sovereignty against the fact that global stablecoins are dominated by the U.S. dollar while domestic payments are already near-instant.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashThin domestic need despite sovereignty aimsThe case for a won-pegged token is facing challenging headwinds. As a recent Korea Economic Daily report highlighted, skeptics argue the won's limited global demand and lack of reserve currency status would curb its adoption internationally. Domestically, the need is even less apparent. A study by NH Investment & Securities noted that with retail payments settling in seconds via biometrics or passwords, and with world-leading credit card and bank account penetration, the efficiency gains from a stablecoin are marginal at best. Despite this, the appeal of digital currencies is growing. Transactions in dollar-backed stablecoins USDT and USDC on Korea’s five main exchanges totaled nearly $71 billion between January and August, according to CryptoQuant. This rising adoption presents both an opportunity and a threat. While some analysts believe stablecoins could smooth exchange-rate volatility, the Bank of Korea (BOK) has expressed concern. In a recent working paper, Son Min-kyu of the central bank commented that the widespread use of dollar-backed stablecoins could entrench the dollar's dominance, while also amplifying run risk and market volatility in Treasuries during periods of stress. Scarce short-term collateralSeoul also faces a unique structural hurdle: a shortage of short-term government bonds to use as collateral. Unlike the U.S., where stablecoin issuers rely on a deep market for Treasury bills, Korea’s bond market is dominated by long-dated paper. Kim Pil-kyu of the Korea Capital Market Institute (KCMI) described short-term sovereign bills as vital for a stablecoin’s value preservation, a resource Korea currently lacks. As South Korea deliberates, other major economies are forging ahead on divergent paths. Japan is moving to authorize privately issued stablecoins this fall, while the European Union has brought them under its comprehensive Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. UK’s cap plan clashes with pro-innovation pushThis regulatory balancing act is also playing out in the U.K., where a policy rift is emerging. According to the Financial Times, the Bank of England has proposed capping individual holdings of widely used stablecoins at £10,000–£20,000, with a £10 million limit for businesses. Industry groups argue the plan would be expensive to implement and could blunt the U.K.’s competitive edge in digital finance. The central bank's caution also contrasts with the government's pro-innovation stance, with finance minister Rachel Reeves recently pledging to promote the use of stablecoins and tokenized securities. For Seoul, the global shift toward tokenized money is undeniable. With seemingly limited domestic demand and various structural challenges, a won-backed stablecoin is, for now, an idea worth watching as the broader financial landscape evolves.