Filipino legislator proposes bill to establish Bitcoin reserve

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.

Singapore-headquartered crypto exchange platform Crypto.com has boosted its standing amongst its peers by achieving the largest spot crypto trading volume for the month of July where USD-supported exchanges are concerned. According to data published by The Block, the exchange platform achieved $68.85 billion in spot trading volume among USD-supported exchanges in July out of an overall total of $178.84 billion. American exchange platform Coinbase was next in the rankings, with a July trading volume total of $63.97 billion.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashInstitutional client boost It’s understood that the uptick in trading volume experienced by the exchange platform is as a consequence of an increase in the number of institutional clients using Crypto.com’s trading services.  Giuseppe Giuliani, the managing director of Crypto.com, told Cointelegraph that more institutional clients are using the platform due to an improved product offering, together with stronger market conditions. Giuliani stated: “This growth has been primarily driven by the acquisition of new clients on the platform, both large institutions and advanced retail traders, and is being supported by stronger market conditions in 2024.” Giuliani told The Block that growth on the platform has played out over the medium term, stating:  "We have seen incremental market share growth month on month over the last 18 months.” Driving Bitcoin unit price Institutional adoption has been a developing theme in 2024. Some analysts have pointed to its importance in the attainment of an ever higher Bitcoin unit price. Crypto market analyst Willy Woo has suggested recently that a 3% allocation by institutions could lead to a Bitcoin unit price of $700,000. In its most recent quarterly report, global investment bank Canaccord Genuity outlined that there is growing institutional adoption relative to spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The launch of spot Ethereum ETF products in the U.S. last month is also understood to have helped towards an improved monthly trading volume for Crypto.com. Giuliani stated: “In the week of July 21 during which Ether ETF was launched, we have seen double-digit growth in our exchange’s Ether spot and perpetual volume week-on-week, building on consecutive weeks of robust volume growth.” Furthermore, the exchange platform claims to have seen increased interest and market participation from TradFi firms. Growing through licensing and sponsorship Crypto.com has attempted to further its market impact worldwide, including in Hong Kong, having applied for a trading license in the Chinese autonomous territory in February, and succeeding in that endeavor more recently according to subsequent reports. It received a license from the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in 2022, with the FCA awarding the company a further license, an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license, in 2023. High profile sports sponsorships is another marketing strategy the firm has pursued in recent years. The company has claimed to be reaping the rewards of these deals, which it has made in Formula 1 (F1) motor racing and the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC).

Crypto infrastructure, mining and investment firm Phoenix Group, a company based in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and publicly listed on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX), has established a $150 million crypto treasury.Photo by Jievani Weerasinghe on UnsplashFirst ADX-listed firm to establish crypto treasuryThe development emerged as the company released its results for Q2 2025. Phoenix Group explained in a press release that its activities in Q2 led to it becoming the first ADX-listed company to establish a strategic crypto treasury with Bitcoin (BTC) and Solana (SOL) holdings valued at $150 million. Phoenix asserted that unlike its competitors which are burdened by debt, it has a healthy balance sheet, with debt of just $16 million. This has enabled it to pursue the establishment of a strategic crypto reserve. The company is also expanding into AI-related activities, with plans to repurpose part of its U.S. infrastructure. That adjustment will allow the firm to establish a multi-use compute facility, enabling it to build out its AI vertical. Phoenix Group Co-Founder and CEO Munaf Ali said that Phoenix is working towards building out one gigawatt of hybrid infrastructure by 2027. Ali also commented on the pursuit of a crypto treasury, stating:“Holding Bitcoin and other strategic digital assets isn’t just about exposure. It’s about alignment. We believe in the long-term value these networks represent, and our treasury strategy reflects that belief.”DWF Ventures, the ventures arm of crypto market maker DWF Labs that relocated its headquarters from Singapore to Abu Dhabi earlier this year, released a report in June revealing that publicly-listed companies that have adopted a crypto treasury strategy have amassed holdings of $76 billion in crypto. Phoenix Group has disclosed that to date, it has accumulated 514 Bitcoin and over 630,000 Solana with a view towards holding these digital assets in the long term. Earlier this year, American digital asset investment firm Sarson Funds outlined that the UAE is playing a significant role in advancing Bitcoin adoption at a corporate level in the context of the ongoing trend towards the pursuit of a Bitcoin corporate treasury strategy. Miners accumulatingPhoenix Group isn’t the only company involved in crypto mining to establish a crypto corporate treasury recently. In June, American miner BitMine Immersion Technologies disclosed that it was raising $18 million through a public share offering to buy Bitcoin. Since then, it has been accumulating Ether (ETH). As of July 24, the firm held over 300,000 ETH, with plans to raise $4.5 billion to fuel further ETH purchases. MARA Holdings, a publicly-listed American Bitcoin miner, has also confirmed that its treasury now extends beyond Bitcoin that it mined itself. Phoenix Group confirmed that it mined 336 BTC in Q2, with 689 BTC mined over the course of H1 2025. Founded in 2017, the firm debuted on the ADX in December 2023 with its stock immediately surging by 50% from its initial public offering (IPO) launch price. The firm’s share price has also performed well in 2025, surging 72% from April to June.