Top

EU bans Ruble-backed stablecoin A7A5 in latest round of Russia sanctions

Policy & Regulation·October 29, 2025, 6:31 AM

The European Council has banned all transactions within the European Union (EU) involving the Russian Ruble-backed stablecoin A7A5, according to a press release published Oct. 23.

 

The prohibition targets the stablecoin itself, its developer, its Kyrgyzstan-based issuer, and the operator of a platform that facilitates major A7A5 trades. The package also takes aim at Russian crypto exchanges.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/8d2f3591b98e3daf67502602aacc4069.webp
Photo by Christian Lue on Unsplash

Additional banking restrictions

This measure is part of a broader set of economic sanctions against sectors the EU stated assist the Russian invasion of Ukraine, including energy, finance, and defense industries. As part of this financial clampdown, the EU will also impose a ban on five additional Russian lenders starting Nov. 12. One of those lenders, Alfa-Bank, recently began offering Bitcoin buying and selling services, according to an X post by journalist Pete Rizzo.

 

The European body said the new crypto measures address Russia’s increasing use of digital assets to circumvent existing sanctions. Russian banks were cut off from the SWIFT international payment system in early 2022, following the onset of the Russo-Ukrainian war.

 

Reports of Russia using cryptocurrency to finance malign activities have surfaced previously. Earlier this month, Sławomir Cenckiewicz, the head of the Polish National Security Bureau (BBN), told the Financial Times that Russia has employed crypto to finance attacks on EU countries. Cenckiewicz said that a network of agents recruited by Russia’s GRU military intelligence agency and uncovered in Poland in 2023 had been substantially funded with cryptocurrency.

 

Reflecting this concern, lawmakers in Poland’s lower house approved a bill in September to strengthen national crypto oversight, a move also expected to help curb Russian funding channels. Cenckiewicz noted that Polish intelligence agencies are closely monitoring the legislation to prevent loopholes that allow foreign actors to support agents using digital assets.

 

Russia’s evolving crypto policy

The EU’s action comes as Russia itself is attempting to refine its own cryptocurrency rules.

 

According to the Moscow Times, Russia's central bank wants to limit cryptocurrency use strictly to cross-border payments within an experimental legal regime (ELR). The institution continues to reject recognition of cryptocurrency as a legal means of payment and has advocated banning its use for domestic payments and retail investment, while permitting trading only for high-net-worth individuals through licensed platforms.

 

Russia’s finance ministry has expressed a more flexible view, pointing to the scale of crypto adoption among the public. Earlier this year, the central bank estimated that domestic crypto transactions exceeded 1 trillion rubles (about $12.4 billion) per month, and that as of March, wallets linked to Russian users held roughly 827 billion rubles (about $10.2 billion).

 

The finance ministry and the central bank have agreed to tighten supervision of the crypto market, with officials expecting to finalize the new framework before the end of the year.

 

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Nov 02, 2023

South Korean FIU rejects Hanbitco’s bid to become fiat-to-crypto exchange

South Korean FIU rejects Hanbitco’s bid to become fiat-to-crypto exchangeWhile numerous cryptocurrency-only exchanges in Korea have been vying for registration as fiat-to-crypto exchanges with the financial regulator, the government has turned down another platform’s attempt to achieve this status.Photo by Dim Hou on UnsplashUnmet standardsAccording to a report from local news provider MoneyToday, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) recently convened a committee that decided against approving Hanbitco’s request to change its business status. Industry sources suggest that this decision was based on Hanbitco’s inability to meet the standards set by the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, often referred to as the Financial Transaction Reporting Act.Fine and cautionary orderA person familiar with the matter that the committee started deliberating on Hanbitco’s request to alter its business status about two weeks ago and ultimately decided against it. A significant factor in this decision might have been the KRW 2 billion ($1.49 million) fine levied on Hanbitco, stemming from numerous violations found in recent on-site inspections, the source added.Before approaching the FIU with its request, Hanbitco formed a partnership with Kwangju Bank in June to obtain real-name accounts, facilitating Korean won deposits and withdrawals. Achieving this is quite uncommon for a crypto-only exchange. In Korea, exchanges are legally required to have real-name bank accounts for trading in Korean won. Presently, only five platforms hold registration as fiat-to-crypto exchanges: Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax, each having its own banking partnership.As per the details released by the FIU, besides the levied fine, Hanbitco was issued a cautionary order, and five of its employees faced reprimands.The fine of KRW 2 billion is the heaviest handed out to a virtual asset service provider from on-site inspections held between last year and the first half of this year. For perspective, Upbit, the country’s largest crypto exchange, was fined KRW 80 million.An FIU representative noted that during the evaluation of Hanbitco’s application to transition into a fiat-to-crypto exchange, factors such as the firm’s anti-money laundering (AML) protocols, its internal control systems and past sanctions played a role in the decision-making process.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 31, 2023

Terraform Labs Co-Founder Daniel Shin Denies Wrongdoing in LUNA Collapse

Terraform Labs Co-Founder Daniel Shin Denies Wrongdoing in LUNA CollapseShin Hyun-seong, popularly known as Daniel Shin, has refuted accusations against him related to the $40 billion collapse of the stablecoin TerraUSD and its companion token, LUNA, according to a report by local news outlet Newspim. He presented this defense during his initial trial at the Seoul Southern District Court on October 30 (local time).Shin co-founded Terraform Labs, the company responsible for issuing TerraUSD and LUNA. His co-founder, Do Kwon, is currently serving a four-month prison sentence in Montenegro for passport forgery.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashProsecution’s allegationsKorean prosecutors allege that since 2018, Shin and his colleagues have concealed the fabricated nature of the “Terra project.” By manipulating trades and releasing misleading information, they purportedly misled investors into thinking the project was successful. It’s believed they sold off their tokens before the LUNA crash in May 2022, earning KRW 462.9 billion ($343.3 million) from these activities. They are suspected of personally taking KRW 376.9 billion from this amount.Prosecutors are focusing on Shin as the potential orchestrator of the LUNA crash. They speculate he began selling LUNA tokens around when Terraform Labs launched the Anchor Protocol in March 2021. This DeFi protocol increased the popularity and value of LUNA tokens. Before the crash, Shin is alleged to have gained at least KRW 154.1 billion.Defense argumentHowever, Shin’s legal team countered by asserting that Shin had cut ties with Kwon in 2020. They argued the decline of TerraUSD and LUNA was due to Kwon’s mishandling of the Anchor Protocol and an external attack, neither associated with Shin. Regarding the exploit, Terraform Labs has pursued legal action in the United States Southern District of Florida, claiming that American market maker Citadel Securities played a part in undermining TerraUSD in May 2022.Defending Shin, his lawyers emphasized that at the inception of the Terra project, there were no legal guidelines specifically for cryptocurrency transactions. Additionally, unlike Do Kwon who kept fleeing abroad, Shin willingly came back to Korea and has been cooperating with the investigation. They also noted he received only 32% of the 70 million LUNA tokens initially promised. Regarding classification, they stated LUNA isn’t legally recognized as a security.Shin’s lawyers further argued the prosecution hasn’t clearly identified victims or adequately outlined the components of fraud in this case. They said the prosecution’s case hinges on viewing LUNA as a security. However, Shin’s legal representatives maintained that under the Korean Capital Markets Act, LUNA isn’t a security, making its trades non-fraudulent.To counter a US court ruling the prosecution presented — that a token is a security — Shin’s defense highlighted that the verdict is from a lower court and remains contested. Earlier, prosecutors had cited a ruling from the United States Southern District Court of New York, which classified the XRP tokens sold to institutional investors as securities.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jun 16, 2023

New York Bans CoinEx While Seizing Crypto Assets

New York Bans CoinEx While Seizing Crypto AssetsCoinEx, a Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency exchange, has been banned from operating in the US state of New York by Attorney General Letitia James. The ban comes after the exchange allegedly failed to register as a securities and commodities brokerage and falsely represented itself as an exchange.Photo by Jan van der Wolf on Pexels$1.7 million seizureThat’s according to a statement published by the Office of the New York State Attorney General on Thursday. As part of an agreement reached between the parties, over $1.7 million worth of CoinEx’s funds have been seized.Under the terms of the agreement, approximately $1.1 million will be returned to 4,691 investors from New York, and an additional $600,000 will be paid in penalties to the state. To prevent access by New York IP addresses, CoinEx must implement geo-blocking. Moreover, the exchange is forbidden from creating new accounts for customers based in the United States.Trade prohibitionThis recent development resolves a lawsuit filed against CoinEx in February by the New York state. The state accused the exchange of misleading investors and failing to register with local authorities. In accordance with the consent order, CoinEx is now prohibited from offering, selling, or purchasing securities and commodities in New York and cannot make its platform available in the state.James emphasized the consequences for crypto companies that disregard New York’s laws and put investors at risk. The agreement serves as a warning that her office will continue to crack down on such companies. CoinEx users have a 90-day period to recover their crypto funds directly from the exchange.After this period, eligible investors can request fiat currency refunds by emailing coinexrefund@ag.ny.gov. Refunds will be provided in cryptocurrency or cash equivalents held in accounts as of April 25.CoinEx faced a lawsuit in the New York Supreme Court on February 22, where Attorney General James alleged that the exchange engaged in fraudulent practices and violated the state’s Martin Act, known for its strict anti-fraud provisions. The complaint included tokens such as Amp, LBRY Credits (LBC), Rally (RLY), and Terra.Harsh stanceThe banning of CoinEx in New York highlights the regulatory scrutiny surrounding cryptocurrency exchanges and the importance of compliance with local laws and regulations. On the one hand, the enforcement actions taken by authorities aim to protect investors and ensure the integrity of the financial system.However, the state of New York has been particularly harsh in its dealings with crypto companies. As today’s statement reveals, the New York Attorney General has taken action previously against crypto exchange Kucoin, crypto lending platform Nexo, and USDT stablecoin issuer Tether.These actions tie in with the current anti-crypto regulatory pushback that prevails in the United States right now. Other state agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) who last week sued global crypto exchanges Coinbase and Binance, the Federal Reserve, the Department of the Treasury, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), have all conspired to crack down on the industry in the US in recent months.

news
Loading