South Korean cryptocurrency-only exchange Cashierest to close its doors

GRVT (Gravity), a self-custodial hybrid crypto exchange, has received $5 million in funding from Abu Dhabi-based venture capital firm Further Ventures. That’s according to a report published by The Block on Jan. 21. GRVT seeks to blend the benefits of both centralized exchanges and decentralized exchanges in a hybrid model built using ZKsync’s Validium ZK Chain. The platform offers off-chain order matching paired with on-chain settlement at a rate of 600,000 transactions per second (TPS). Settlements are secure and verifiable on the blockchain, while the user maintains custody of his/her assets, and the order book infrastructure is nevertheless centralized.Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on UnsplashEquity-based funding dealThis latest equity-based funding round ran from October until it was closed out in December. Further Ventures, an entity that specializes in early-stage startup funding, led the round, making this its latest investment into a crypto-sector startup.  Earlier this month, the venture capital firm led a funding round into Paris-based crypto wallet technology firm Dfns. Last year, it collaborated with Singapore-headquartered crypto trading firm QCP Capital, in facilitating its expansion in Abu Dhabi.  Other crypto-related investments include staking services provider Twinstake, crypto custodian Tungsten, blockchain infrastructure platform Fuze and crypto derivatives platform Kemet Trading.  Further Ventures counts ADQ, Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth fund, among its investors. In 2022, it established a $200 million fund, which was earmarked for investment into early-stage startups in the fintech, digital assets and supply chain sectors. In the past, Hong Kong-based GRVT has held pre-seed and seed funding rounds that involved GRVT token warrants. On this occasion, the funding deal was structured as equity. GRVT CEO Hong Yea explained that equity was chosen as it was felt that the GRVT token should be held in reserve for the community. Additionally, structuring the funding round around equity means that the holding company has the freedom to pivot or expand into alternative business lines in the future. $14.3 million in funding to dateBack in October 2023, the project raised $7.1 million in funding based on a $39 million valuation. That round was co-led by Matrix Partners alongside Delphi Digital, with further participation by Susquehanna Investment Group, CMS Holdings, ABCDE and Hack VC. Matter Labs, the developer of the ZKsync scaling network that GRVT runs on, was also a participant.  This latest funding round brings GRVT’s total capital raised to $14.3 million. In March of last year, the firm had raised $2.2 million from a private token sale. Expanding spot & options tradingIt’s understood that the new funding will be used to expand the platform’s crypto spot and options trading. Furthermore, the firm has plans to acquire an upgraded full Class F license from the regulator in Bermuda. Currently, the Bermudan authorities have issued the company with a modified Class M crypto business license. In an effort to unlock its offering to a broader global market, the company also has plans to pursue a Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) license within the European Union and a virtual assets service provider (VATP) license from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) in Dubai. 

While Indonesia has been recognized as one of the world's swiftest embracers of cryptocurrencies, it has faced a notable setback more recently, with a 60% decline in transaction volumes on local exchanges compared to the preceding year. High taxesIn a recent report by CoinDesk Indonesia, the publication speculates that the imposition of high taxes may be a pivotal factor dissuading traders and impacting the overall market dynamics. Indonesia’s tax system treats crypto assets as commodities, with the burdensome taxes arising as a direct consequence of that classification. The tax framework in Indonesia subjects crypto assets to both income tax and value-added tax (VAT), treating them akin to commodities. Leading crypto exchanges in the country reveal that the cumulative tax load on each transaction could surpass the trading fees imposed by exchanges, potentially discouraging users from engaging in crypto transactions. Oscar Darmawan, the CEO of the leading Indonesian crypto exchange INDODAX, told CoinDesk that users bear an income tax of 0.1% and a VAT of 0.11% on every crypto transaction. Additionally, exchanges are required to remit a 0.04% fee to the recently established national crypto bourse. Darmawan clarified that “this places a significant financial burden on the domestic crypto industry." expresses Darmawan in an interview with CoinDesk Indonesia, underscoring the challenges faced by the industry due to the current tax structure.Photo by Nataliya Vaitkevich on PexelsAn international issueThe tax treatment of digital assets has been a bugbear for the crypto space on an international basis. In Japan, it arose last month that the country’s lawmakers were considering applying an exemption for companies from paying taxes on unrealized cryptocurrency gains. It has since transpired that such an amendment will be applied to its fiscal 2024 tax reform plan. India has applied a heavy tax burden where crypto is concerned, with a 30% tax applied to capital gains relative to the sale of crypto assets. Additionally, 1% taxation applies by way of a tax deducted at source (TDS) on crypto transactions. The use of cryptocurrency for the purchase of goods and services in the United States remains a stumbling block, given that the current tax code treats such a scenario as a taxable event. Last year, two U.S. senators attempted to address that issue, by including a $200 exemption for purchases made with cryptocurrency. Calls for crypto asset reclassificationIn response to this dilemma in Indonesia, some stakeholders within the local crypto industry advocate for a paradigm shift in the classification of crypto assets. They propose treating crypto as securities instead of commodities, anticipating that this alteration could alleviate the tax burden on users. Yudhono Rawis, the CEO of the exchange platform Tokocrypto, asserts: "Both stocks and crypto are tradable assets with profit potential … Thus, implementing the same tax regime for both these investment instruments would be more equitable and consistent." The industry anticipates regulatory changes in the near future, as crypto oversight in Indonesia is set to transition from the commodities regulator to the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in January 2025.  

Chinese Fentanyl Producers Taking Payment in CryptoA report produced by blockchain analytics and crypto compliance solutions firm Elliptic has found that most Chinese suppliers of fentanyl precursors are accepting payments for the illicit material in cryptocurrency.In a blog post published on its website on Tuesday, Elliptic claimed that 90 percent of the 90 China-based firms, from which its researchers received offers of fentanyl precursors, accepted cryptocurrency as a form of payment. The majority of fentanyl which is trafficked into the United States is manufactured using imported fentanyl precursors like the material that the Elliptic researchers were offered.Seventeen of the suppliers even offered to provide fentanyl itself. Others still offered to supply synthetic opioids, equally or more potent than fentanyl, which are currently legal to both produce and supply within China.Photo by Hal Gatewood on UnsplashTracking blockchain transactionsIn tracing back transactions relative to these illicit suppliers, the Elliptic researchers’ analysis demonstrated that the digital asset wallets used by the rogue suppliers have received thousands of payments. The research team has estimated the net worth of those transactions to total $27 million.It appears that a move towards crypto payments is trending with this group of suppliers as there has been a 450% increase year-on-year when it comes to payments for fentanyl precursor using crypto.The study highlighted activity related to Dutch national Alex Peijnenburg. An alleged fentanyl supplier, Peijnenburg, made an $85,000 payment in crypto to one of the ninety fentanyl precursor suppliers identified by Elliptic researchers. In November of last year, the Dutchman was sanctioned by US authorities relative to his activities.Global trade and distributionThe report stated: “During our correspondence, the suppliers showed no concerns about how the chemical would be used, with some explaining that it was their best-selling product and could be used to produce fentanyl.”It went on to state that “others pointedly mentioned that they had sold it to customers in Mexico.” Mexico is a significant location in the global drugs trade, given the activity of drug cartels within the country. One supplier offered an insight to researchers as to the preferences of their nefarious Mexican clients, stating: “They always use USDT or Bitcoin to pay. It is no problem.”While it looks like these nefarious Chinese companies are able to trade into and out of crypto assets, that should be a difficulty for them as China banned the offering of crypto trading services going back a number of years already. Furthermore, foreign digital asset exchanges are prohibited from servicing the needs of Chinese clients where crypto is concerned.Elliptic’s research team uncovered that the majority of the illicit drugs trade suppliers have been using workarounds in order to gain access to overseas digital asset exchanges. The suppliers have used intermediaries in order to convert crypto into Chinese yuan.The report concludes that this part of the international fentanyl trade can be dealt with and “disrupted by the services that act as gateways into and out of crypto assets.” On arriving at that conclusion, Elliptic has acted by notifying the digital asset exchanges that these suppliers are using. “[We] have flagged hundreds of crypto addresses in our tools as being linked to this activity,” the report states.Crypto had infamously been associated with illicit activity on the dark web in its earliest years. It has moved well beyond that although due to its decentralized nature, it’s difficult, if not impossible, to control who utilizes decentralized digital currency.