Dunamu Pushes for Biodiversity Conservation Through NFT Project

RaonSecure showcases blockchain-based SaaS to student ID card associationRaonSecure, a South Korean tech security company, recently showcased their blockchain-based Software as a Service (SaaS) solution, OmniOne Digital ID, to executives from the International Student Identity Card (ISIC) Association during their visit to RaonSecure’s headquarters in Seoul, as per a report by news outlet Digital Today. The tech firm also proposed a mobile ID project catered to ISIC.Photo by Matese Fields on Unsplash2.5 million student ID cards per yearThe ISIC Association, a non-profit organization registered in Denmark, is renowned for issuing approximately 2.5 million student identity cards each year. These cards are recognized and accepted in 108 countries globally.Various discount programsISIC card holders have access to an extensive range of discount programs at ISIC’s partner merchants. These discounts span a wide variety of industries, offering savings in areas such as accommodation, cultural attractions and travel. This feature of the ISIC card makes it a beneficial resource for students worldwide who are looking to save money while accessing various services and experiences.In October, RaonSecure signed a business partnership with two organizations to develop digital ID-based ISIC on mobile platforms. One of them is KISES Corporation, the Korean branch of ISIC, and the other is smart card service provider Future & More.

Upbit Reassures Investors Following False APT Token DepositsFollowing a recent situation where false Aptos (APT) tokens were mistakenly accepted as authentic deposits, Upbit, South Korea’s leading cryptocurrency exchange, has reassured investors that such problems will not recur.Photo by Markus Spiske on UnsplashIrregular Aptos token depositsAn Upbit representative informed local news outlet Digital Asset that the platform had detected irregular deposit activities related to Aptos-based tokens of the same type on September 24. In response, the platform addressed the coding anomalies during the suspension of APT deposits and withdrawals.Software correctionThe representative said that, as the resumption of APT deposits and withdrawals took place at 23:00 KST on September 24 after the software correction, no virtual assets on the exchange, including APT, should face similar issues in the future.Asset monitoringThe official highlighted that the trading platform employs a real-time process that monitors and compares customer assets with on-chain assets, a step that contributed to the mitigation of the fallout from the incident.

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory frameworkThe Indian courts have declined a consideration targeting the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading, following a plea which had been brought to court by a petitioner.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashBeyond the court’s purviewIndia’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, recently confronted a petition urging the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading. According to a local media report, the bench, which included Justices JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea, emphasizing that the demands presented were legislative and thus beyond the court’s direct action purview. This decision points to the judiciary’s recognition of its constraints in crafting laws, particularly in intricate domains like cryptocurrency.The petitioner, Manu Prashant Wig, a former director at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited currently in custody due to allegations of cryptocurrency fraud, sought relief through a public interest litigation (PIL) for crypto trading regulations in India.The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police accused Wig in 2020 of deceiving investors with promises of high returns from crypto investments, involving 133 reported victims of the scheme. Despite this, during the hearing, the Supreme Court advised Wig to pursue legal remedies through appropriate channels, specifically for bail, underlining its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Constitution for legislative matters.Judiciary criticize governmentWhile the judiciary has found that it cannot act itself in putting in place a crypto regulatory framework, the Supreme Court has been critical of the government’s inaction on the matter. In July, India’s highest court criticized the Indian government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations.Interestingly, while the government hasn’t acted locally, it has been making efforts to drive regulation at an international level instead. The status of cryptocurrency trading in India remains uncertain, with the country developing a regulatory framework influenced by recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), potentially leading to legal legislation within the next several months.Prime Minister Modi called on authorities internationally to establish a worldwide regulatory framework. At the recent G20 summit, it appears that member states did reach agreement on such a framework.The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL marks a clear distinction between judicial and legislative responsibilities. As India moves closer to formulating a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework, this decision reinforces the imperative for legislative action to address mounting concerns and interests in the crypto market.Awaiting legislative actionThe outcome of these developments is keenly awaited by investors, legal experts and the crypto community, poised to shape the future landscape of cryptocurrency trading in India. The decision signifies the judiciary’s acknowledgment of its limitations and highlights the necessity for a legislative approach to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.In this evolving scenario, the verdict amplifies the importance of a well-defined regulatory framework. As the world’s most populous country grapples with the delicate task of balancing innovation and investor protection, the Supreme Court’s decision places the ball firmly in the legislative court.