Hong Kong’s Bricks-and-Mortar Crypto Shops Attract Chinese Visitors

Binance and Gulf Energy launch digital asset exchange in ThailandThe world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Binance, has teamed up with Gulf Energy Development, a leading energy company in Thailand, to operate a digital asset exchange in the country.Photo by Than Diep on UnsplashInvitation-only launchThe new platform, Binance.th, aims to capture the growing demand for crypto services in Southeast Asia. Binance.th, which is currently in its beta testing phase, is expected to open to the public in early 2024. A filing on Wednesday by Gulf to the Thai stock exchange demonstrates that the platform has received approval from the Thai Securities and Exchange Commission to offer exchange and brokerage services for cryptocurrencies and digital tokens. The filing states:“Gulf Binance’s digital asset platform will provide digital asset exchange and digital asset broker services for both cryptocurrencies and digital tokens, prioritizing security and compliance with SEC regulations.”The platform is initially available by invitation only, and the plan is to eventually open the exchange to the general public. It’s understood that the platform will strive to provide a “globally standardized” service that will enhance the level of service in Thailand and promote the development of the country’s blockchain ecosystem.Market opportunityBinance.th enters the Thai crypto market at a time when the local leader, Bitkub, holds a dominant share of 75.4%. Bitkub benefited from the global crypto market downturn in 2022, which affected its competitors such as FTX and Zipmex.Although it has extended market share during the downturn and as a consequence of the demise of other platforms, Bitkub has also struggled with market conditions. In July its parent company Bitkub Capital Group, reduced headcount by six percent. Bitkub recorded $28.6 billion in trading volume last year, out of the total $37.94 billion generated by the top four Thai exchanges.Binance.th hopes to challenge Bitkub’s position by leveraging Binance’s global reputation and expertise in the crypto industry.Legal woesThe launch of Binance.th comes amid Binance’s legal and regulatory troubles in the U.S. and Europe. In September, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued Binance, its U.S. subsidiary, and its founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) for allegedly listing unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrencies.In June, the SEC also accused CZ and Binance of illegally marketing its international platform to U.S. customers.Binance has been trying to improve its compliance and governance standards in response to regulatory scrutiny. The company has hired former regulators and executives from the traditional finance sector to lead its operations in various regions. Binance has also applied for licenses and registrations in several jurisdictions, such as the U.K., Singapore and Japan.The origins of this deal stem from a memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed between Binance and Gulf Energy in January 2022. The joint venture business which emerged acquired a digital operator license in Thailand in May of this year.By expanding its presence in Southeast Asia, Binance hopes to tap into the potential of the emerging crypto markets and diversify its revenue streams. Binance.th also marks the first bank-backed crypto exchange in Thailand, as Gulf Energy Development is partly owned by the state-owned Krung Thai Bank.

Survey Reveals Favorable Public Opinion on Binance’s Acquisition of Korean Exchange GopaxCratos, a South Korean blockchain-based polling app, conducted a survey from June 12 to June 14 to gauge public opinion on whether the Financial Services Commission (FSC) should approve the request of Korean cryptocurrency exchange Gopax’s operator Streami to change its representatives, as reported by local news outlet The Stock. This change is necessary for global crypto exchange Binance to acquire Gopax.The survey, which involved 2,093 participants, revealed that 64.6% of respondents favored approving the acquisition, while 35.4% opposed it. More than half of the participants believed that approving the acquisition would safeguard investors’ assets deposited in Gopax.Photo by Heesang Park on PexelsSurvey resultsWhen analyzed by age group, the survey found that respondents in their teens and 20s were more likely to disagree with the acquisition, with 69.4% and 52.3%, respectively. However, those in their 30s were more inclined to support it. Notably, over 70% of respondents in their 50s agreed with the acquisition.Among those who favored Binance’s acquisition, 55.5% chose investor protection as their reason. 33.5% believed there were no legal grounds to refuse the acquisition (33.5%), and 11.0% expressed concerns about the potential shrinkage of the crypto market (11.0%).On the other hand, the most common reason given by respondents for opposing the acquisition was the risk of Binance’s opaque business and financial structure (45.8%). This was followed by the ineligibility of executives, representatives, and other major shareholders (37.4%) and the risk of disrupting the crypto market (16.8%).Consensus on investor protectionCratos CEO Kang Dong-won explained that the crypto winter, characterized by declining crypto asset values, has been prolonged due to a series of negative news at home and abroad, including the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuits against Binance and Coinbase, poor performance of crypto exchanges, and controversy over a Korean lawmaker’s alleged holding and investment of crypto assets. Kang believes that the survey findings reflect falling crypto yields, leading to a growing consensus on the need for investor principal protection and victim relief.On March 7, Streami submitted a report to notify the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the FSC about the change of its representatives. However, the Korean financial watchdog has been pending its decision amid Binance’s legal issues.The concern is that if Binance fails to acquire Gopax, investors could suffer losses since their assets worth KRW 56.6 billion are held in GoFi, the exchange’s crypto deposit service. On June 8, GoFi users sent a public inquiry to the FIU regarding the reasons for the delay in approving the exchange operator’s request. In the meantime, Streami is exploring ways to address this challenge by announcing its board meeting scheduled for next week. The meeting will discuss changing its CEO from Leon Sing Foong, Asia Pacific Head at Binance, to Lee Joong-hoon, Gopax’s current Vice President, as it is believed that appointing a Korean national as the CEO would facilitate smoother communication with the government.

A Chinese creditor of failed crypto exchange FTX has filed an objection on his own behalf and that of 300 others, with a U.S. bankruptcy court against a motion lodged with a view towards excluding payouts to creditors resident in China, Russia and 47 other foreign jurisdictions.Photo by Mariia Shalabaieva on UnsplashPotential distribution forfeitureThe FTX Recovery Trust, an entity formed in January to oversee the FTX bankruptcy estate following the adoption of a plan of reorganization, filed a motion last week seeking the approval of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court in the United States to adhere to new parameters related to the claims of creditors residing in restricted overseas jurisdictions. Besides China and Russia, the list of restricted jurisdictions also includes many within the Asian region, including  Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Macau, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, North Korea, Pakistan, Qatar, Bangladesh and Cambodia. The FTX estate claims that these jurisdictions have regulations and laws restricting cryptocurrency transactions. In such cases, the FTX Recovery Trust claims that it cannot break local laws.  The difficulty for creditors resident in these countries is that if it's deemed illegal to reimburse them, they won’t qualify for the next scheduled distribution from the estate. In that instance, distribution forfeiture will be triggered. Taking to X on July 7, FTXcreditor.com, an entity that has been buying up bankruptcy claims from FTX creditors over the course of the FTX bankruptcy process, highlighted the peril that creditors residing in these restricted countries may face. It stated: “Distribution forfeiture is triggered at every distribution record date. The first record date already passed, if your claim is still tied to a local KYC when the stamp drops, that tranche is potentially gone.” Short timeframe for objectionsMr. Purple, a pseudonymous distressed assets bankruptcy professional who has been advocating for FTX creditors since the collapse of the business in November 2022, concurred with this view in a subsequent post on X. He pointed out that an extremely short timeframe has been given to affected creditors to respond. The motion was filed on July 2 and objections are due by July 15. $500 million in claims are at stake which accounts for 5% of all creditor claims. Of this, 82% of these claims belong to Chinese creditors. In a series of follow-up posts, the bankruptcy professional describes several procedural issues that he believes will result in it being incredibly difficult for affected creditors to have their funds reimbursed.Mr. Purple concludes:”The incentives are designed to be extremely risk averse in finding [a legal opinion] that paying creditors is legal! [The estate’s lawyers will] take the fees and say its not legal.” In his court filing, the Chinese creditor, who is resident in Singapore, stated: “My family holds four KYC-verified accounts with aggregate claims exceeding $15 million USD.” . . . “We have fully complied with every procedural requirement under the Plan. The proposed motion now jeopardizes our right to distribution in an arbitrary and inequitable manner.” On X, he asserted that the FTX Recovery Trust’s motion “constitutes an impermissible and material modification of the Plan.” Aside from legal action, the only other potential solution for creditors residing in restricted countries is to sell their claims. However, claims buyers are pricing in greater risk with lower rates and less favorable terms.