Japanese Banking Giant Joins Tech Firms to Build Cross-Chain Stablecoin Infrastructure

Fueled by a crypto rally and higher overseas stock balances, South Korea’s National Tax Service (NTS) reported a sharp jump in disclosures of offshore accounts. On Aug. 26, the agency said 6,858 taxpayers declared overseas financial accounts this year, with a combined balance of 94.5 trillion won ($67.6 billion), up 38.3% in filers and 45.6% (29.6 trillion won or $21.2 billion) in value from last year.Photo by Piotr Łaskawski on UnsplashCrypto gains drive offshore filingsWithin that, reports of overseas bank deposits and cryptocurrency accounts rose to 46.4 trillion won ($33.2 billion) this year, more than 12% above 2024. That figure excludes stock accounts, which alone totaled 48.1 trillion won ($34.4 billion). Tax officials attributed the increase largely to the surge in crypto prices and higher balances in overseas stock holdings. The trend is underscored by CoinMarketCap data: the crypto market cap now stands roughly at $3.87 trillion, up 86% from $2.08 trillion a year ago. By asset type, the largest share of filers reported overseas bank deposits (3,197 people), followed by cryptocurrency (2,320) and stocks (1,992). By value, stock accounts dominated with 48.1 trillion won ($34.4 billion), compared with 23.5 trillion won ($16.8 billion) in bank deposits and 11.1 trillion won ($7.94 billion) in cryptocurrencies. Korean law requires residents and domestic corporations to disclose foreign financial accounts if their combined balance exceeds 500 million won ($358,000) on any month-end date during the year. Reports must be filed with the local tax office by June of the following year. The NTS said it will step up enforcement against suspected non-filers, using cross-border information-exchange data to verify offshore holdings. Penalties will include administrative fines, penalty notices, criminal referrals, public naming of violators and the collection of back taxes. The agency added that it is preparing to share crypto transaction data under the OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and urged anyone subject to the rules to promptly file amended or late reports for overseas crypto accounts. The recent bullish sentiment in crypto, which fueled the uptick in foreign financial disclosures, has also been driving public interest in digital assets and boosting expectations for altcoins. A survey by CoinNess and Kratos conducted between Aug. 18 and 22 with 2,000 respondents found that 38.5% expect a limited bull run in a handful of altcoins, either with strong real-world use cases or serving as the underlying assets of launched ETFs. Another 28.5% predicted gains would remain centered on Bitcoin and Ethereum, while 20.7% anticipated a broader altcoin season reminiscent of past cycles. The remaining 12.3% forecast the end of the rally and the start of a downturn. Won stablecoins: policy and risksPolicy momentum around stablecoins is also picking up in South Korea. The Financial Services Commission (FSC) plans to introduce a bill in October governing won-pegged stablecoins as part of the second phase of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act. The legislation is expected to set rules for issuance, collateral management and internal controls. Amid these changes, companies are showing growing interest in launching won-based stablecoins. Kaia, an EVM-compatible, layer-1 blockchain, recently signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with blockchain solutions provider Open Asset to collaborate on projects tied to Korean won–backed stablecoins. The partnership will focus on issuance, distribution, service launches and developing practical use cases. Circle President Heath Tarbert has recently joined calls for a won-backed stablecoin. In an interview with The Korea Economic Daily, he underscored South Korea’s world-class payments infrastructure and said a digital won could help the country play a leading role in blockchain finance. Blockchain transactions, he noted, operate differently from traditional payment rails, making some form of digital currency, whether a stablecoin or a central bank digital currency (CBDC), a necessity. Meanwhile, at a recent meeting with top executives from the country’s four major financial groups, Tarbert ruled out collaborations on won-denominated stablecoins. Instead, he promoted Circle’s dollar-pegged stablecoins and suggested exploring joint initiatives centered around them. Not everyone sees stablecoins as a net positive. NICE Investors Service, a local credit rating agency, warned in a recent report that if banks issue won-based stablecoins, their interest income could suffer. The agency said adoption would likely weigh on banks, benefit securities firms and leave credit card companies largely unaffected. It added that a large shift of funds into stablecoins could shrink banks’ deposit base and weaken their intermediary role. Still, banks that issue stablecoins directly could soften the blow by tapping new fee-based revenue streams. 

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm MisrepresentationThe Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.Photo by Marcel Eberle on UnsplashBanking ordinance violationsIn a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.Misuse of banking termsAny entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.

Philippines Delays Crypto Framework PublicationThe Philippines’ financial regulator has decided to postpone the release of a legal framework for the crypto industry, originally scheduled for late 2022, despite a tumultuous year.That’s according to a report published by local news outlet, Philstar Global. In the face of numerous market failures in 2022, the Philippines’ financial regulator has opted for a cautious approach and delayed the publication of a legal framework for the crypto industry, which was initially expected to be released by the end of the same year. However, work on the guidelines is still ongoing, and there is a possibility that the results could be made public in 2023.Photo by Krisia on PexelsScrutinizing crypto failuresAccording to the chairman of the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Emilio Aquino, the regulatory authority has adjusted its previous deadlines for introducing the crypto framework in the country. The SEC had originally planned to roll out the guidelines in 2022, but they held back in order to thoroughly study the reasons behind the collapse of the FTX exchange and ensure the protection of investors.Aquino stated that there is still a chance that the framework will be issued by the end of 2023, saying, “We haven’t closed the door. We really just have to make sure people don’t get burned.”Earlier this year, the SEC joined forces with the University of the Philippines Law Center (UPLC) to collaborate on the development of guidelines for digital assets. In January 2023, the regulator introduced the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 11765 for public comment. This act, which was signed into law in 2022, however, does not explicitly mention “crypto” or “blockchain.”The crypto industry in the Philippines has been facing increasing pressure. The country’s central bank has been urging citizens to refrain from engaging in any transactions with unregistered or foreign crypto exchanges, and the SEC has echoed these recommendations.In May 2023, the SEC identified Gemini Derivatives as an unregistered security product under national law. In the investor advisory, the Commission wrote: “The public is advised not to invest or to stop investing in the investment scheme of Gemini Trust Company, LLC.”Last month the country hosted a meeting of the Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board. That meeting, held in the Philippines' oldest city, Cebu, highlighted the risks pertaining to crypto assets.Potential for positive approachNevertheless, the Philippines remains an attractive destination for crypto enthusiasts. With its rapidly growing economy, it has emerged as one of the world’s fastest-growing markets, with over 11.6 million Filipinos owning digital assets, placing it 10th worldwide in terms of crypto adoption.In an opinion piece published by Forkast News in April, Robert De Guzman, Head of Legal Compliance at Philippines-based cryptocurrency exchange Coins.ph, outlined his view that the country is forging a positive, workable framework for crypto assets. With that, it sounds like while the delay is unwelcome, the more important factor is that the South East Asian country devises a framework that is fit for purpose relative to the innovation at hand.