Cake DeFi Co-Founder Launches Ordzaar Ordinals Marketplace

BitGo, an American regulated digital asset custody firm, has achieved in-principle approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for a Major Payment Institution (MPI) license, marking a significant milestone in its global expansion efforts.Photo by Sergio Sala on UnsplashExtending global footprintIn a recent social media post, BitGo expressed its enthusiasm for the approval, positioning itself closer to providing specialized trading services for non-retail investors. The company sees this as an opportunity to extend its global footprint and offer regulated, secure and trusted solutions in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region. Lim Ho Beng, BitGo's Asia-Pacific managing director, emphasized Singapore's regulatory clarity regarding digital assets and its status as a leading innovation hub and gateway to the Asia-Pacific as key factors driving BitGo's expansion into the Republic. In a statement provided to The Block, the company outlined that in operating as a crypto brokerage in Singapore, that would position BitGo “as a leading provider of digital asset services for institutional finance throughout APAC.” Expanding service offeringWith the full license on the horizon, BitGo Singapore Pte. Ltd. is aiming to broaden its services in the city-state, facilitating institutional clients in purchasing and selling cryptocurrencies directly from its cold storage custody solution. BitGo CEO Mike Belshe acknowledged the significance of the MAS in-principle approval, particularly following the recent acquisition of the company's German license. Belshe emphasized the company's commitment to providing clients with regulated, secure and trusted solutions as it expands its global presence. Additional licensing successBefore this achievement in Singapore, BitGo had already made notable strides in the global digital asset custody arena. The company secured a crypto custody license from Germany’s Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), a crucial step in its European expansion strategy. BitGo Deutschland GmbH, established in 2020, initially operated under a transitional regime in Germany before obtaining the full license, aligning with the company's dedication to operating in regulatory-compliant markets. Dejan Maljevic, BitGo’s Managing European Director, commended BaFin's role as a global trendsetter in crypto regulation, providing a secure regulatory framework that facilitates progress in digital currencies. In addition to its presence in Germany, BitGo obtained approval from the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) for the New York Trust Charter. This authorization allows BitGo to extend its custody services to a broader range of institutional clients in New York, further solidifying its position as a trusted player in the digital asset custody space. BitGo was one of the first crypto custodians to emerge in catering to institutional clients. It will compete with firms like Zodia Custody, a digital asset custodian backed by Japan’s SBI Holdings and British bank Standard Chartered, which launched its services in Singapore last September. In August, BitGo raised $100 million in Series C funding, based on a company valuation of $1.75 billion. The crypto custodian continues to navigate regulatory landscapes globally, emphasizing its commitment to offering secure and compliant solutions to institutional clients across various jurisdictions.

India is strategically navigating the development of its digital rupee, with the Reserve Bank (RBI) actively addressing privacy concerns through technological solutions in its central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot programs. According to a recent report by CoinDesk, a senior official with insights into these initiatives revealed that while progress is evident, the RBI is proactively exploring ways to ensure privacy in the use of the digital rupee.Photo by Julian Yu on UnsplashPursuing mechanisms to maintain anonymityThe RBI has introduced a new dimension to the discourse on privacy concerns associated with CBDC usage. The central bank official suggested that the RBI may seek legal backing from India’s finance ministry to enact legislation allowing customers to delete transactions for the purpose of maintaining anonymity. New-found urgencyPublic statements from the RBI suggested a lack of urgency in implementing a full-scale retail CBDC, coupled with a reluctance to provide a specific timeline. However, recent events indicate that an underlying sense of urgency may be emerging. In the past month, the retail CBDC achieved a notable milestone, processing one million transactions in a single day, with support from various banks. Several banks, including HDFC Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Axis Bank, Canara Bank, IDFC First Bank and Union Bank of India, reportedly encouraged their employees to deposit funds in CBDC instead of fiat currency, contributing to this achievement. The official overseeing the CBDC development emphasized the necessity for experimentation and substantial efforts to ensure the security of the digital currency. While the settlement aspect is considered straightforward, addressing latency remains a priority for the RBI. No mandate on taxThe RBI, historically known for its opposition to crypto both domestically and globally, clarified that crypto taxation is not within its mandate. This clarification suggests that the RBI might not object if the Indian government decides to reduce the stringent taxes currently imposed on cryptocurrencies. The central bank clarified that it lacks the mandate to express a viewpoint on reducing a contentious tax that has stirred debate within the crypto industry. The RBI has been a driving force behind the adoption of wholesale and retail CBDC since late 2022 when it initiated pilot programs. The official emphasized that taxation matters fall under the government’s purview, reinforcing the RBI’s focus on its designated responsibilities. Similarly, the country’s judiciary recently turned down a plea to have it formulate a crypto regulatory framework, outlining that this too is up to the government to address. The central bank has a historical context of attempting to ban cryptocurrencies, with effective prohibitions in place between 2018 and 2020 until a Supreme Court order overturned the ban. Since then, the RBI has consistently expressed concerns about cryptocurrencies in various forums, including the Group of 20, where India played a leading role in coordinating global regulation in the crypto space. Recent utterances from the RBI governor, Shaktikanta Das, suggest that the regulator is disinterested in seeing the offering of spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in India despite that eventuality coming to pass last month in the United States. Das also spoke positively recently about the tokenization of real-world assets using blockchain technology.

OSL Parent Company Denies Sale PlansBC Technology Group, a Hong Kong-based investment holding company, has firmly denied recent reports suggesting it is exploring the sale of its licensed digital asset business, OSL, for up to HK$1 billion (US$137.3 million).Photo by Nextvoyage on PexelsCompany stock plummetsThis comes in response to a report that emerged via Bloomberg on Monday. The news of the possible sale had a significant impact on the company’s stock, which plummeted by over 22% to HK$3.35 the following day.BC Technology Group, which has been listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange since 2012, is the parent company of OSL. The reports hinted at the possibility of selling off parts of the business, citing undisclosed sources.In response to these rumors, BC Technology Group issued a formal statement to clarify the situation, deeming the article “factually inaccurate and highly misleading.” It vehemently refuted any intention to sell OSL, a key player in the cryptocurrency exchange sector.First licensed exchangeOSL was the first cryptocurrency exchange to be licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong in 2020, initially operated under a voluntary scheme and was limited to serving professional investors. However, the recent licensing requirement broadened its scope, allowing it to cater to retail investors as well, including popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.Both OSL and HashKey had their licenses upgraded this year, enabling them to serve retail investors as per the new policy. However, the reception to this new regulatory framework has been somewhat lukewarm, with only five local exchanges applying for the new virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license. The SFC had to publish a list of applicants following a financial scandal involving the JPEX crypto exchange, which led to over 2,500 complaints and losses totaling approximately HK$1.5 billion.The backdrop of this unfolding situation is Hong Kong’s efforts to establish itself as a significant virtual asset hub. The city announced its ambition to transform into a hub for digital assets a year ago, drawing considerable attention from cryptocurrency exchanges. These efforts included implementing new regulations in June that mandated licensing for cryptocurrency exchanges.Several companies with connections to Hong Kong and mainland China have expressed their intent to obtain a license, potentially taking advantage of Hong Kong’s favorable stance toward virtual assets when compared to mainland China’s strict regulations.High compliance costsNonetheless, high compliance costs in Hong Kong continue to pose a barrier, potentially preventing the city from becoming the primary base of operations for crypto businesses. Industry insiders estimate that the cost of compliance from start to finish can be as high as HK$60 million for a company. Firms have reported that obtaining a trading license in Hong Kong can involve an outlay of between HK$20 million and HK$200 million.As per BC Technology Group’s mid-year report, the company reported a net loss of HK$94.7 million in the first half of 2023. This marked a notable improvement compared to the HK$312.1 million in losses during the same period the previous year. OSL remains a significant source of income for the company.