Top

Crypto Winter Halves Korean Bank Fee Profits

Markets·April 19, 2023, 3:42 AM

Last year, Korean banks collected only half the amount in fees from crypto exchanges compared to the previous year, according to Korean news agency News1.

frozen ball on snow
©Pexels/Pixabay

 

Declining bank fee profits

Files submitted by the Korean Financial Services Commission to Yun Chang-hyun, a member of the ruling People Power Party, revealed that the five major Korean crypto exchanges paid 20.4 billion KRW (~$15.6 million) in fees to banks last year, which is a 49.4% decrease from the previous year’s 40.3 billion KRW (~$30.7 million). These exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax) have established agreements with banks to hold real-name bank accounts, which is a legal requirement for exchanges that wish to conduct trades in Korean won.

Banks that have provided real-name accounts to crypto exchanges saw an increase in fee profits from 2019 to 2021. However, due to a decline in market sentiment last year, trade volume decreased, resulting in a reduction of bank fees. Last year’s crypto winter is attributable to various factors, including uncertainties in the global economy and collapses of crypto enterprises such as Terraform Labs and FTX.

 

Fees by exchanges

In terms of fees paid to banks by exchanges last year, the largest exchange, Upbit, paid 13.9 billion KRW (~$10.6 million) in fees to Kbank, a mobile banking service provider. Bithumb and Coinone paid 4.9 billion KRW (~$3.7 million) and 989 million KRW (~$750,000) in fees to NH Bank, respectively. It is worth noting that Coinone switched its bank from NH Bank to Kakao Bank last November, paying 72 million KRW (~$55,000) to Kakao Bank in the fourth quarter. Korbit paid 486 million KRW (~$370,000) and 19 million KRW (~$14,500) to Shinhan Bank and Jeonbuk Bank, respectively. Gopax partnered with Jeonbuk Bank to obtain its real-name accounts in April last year.

Lawmaker Yun said it was apparent that partnerships were being forged between only a handful of banks and crypto enterprises. Current regulations have to be reviewed to encourage more banks to participate in various blockchain businesses, he added.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 25, 2023

Upbit Accidentally Accepts Counterfeit APT Tokens, Initiates Retrieval Efforts

Upbit Accidentally Accepts Counterfeit APT Tokens, Initiates Retrieval EffortsUpbit, South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, is reported to have accepted deposits of counterfeit Aptos (APT) tokens, mistaking them for their legitimate counterparts. The exchange has been reaching out to the sellers of these tokens by phone, requesting their recovery. This news has been circulating in several online crypto communities since the afternoon of September 24 (Korea Standard Time).Photo by Kenny Eliason on UnsplashUpbit’s responsesOn September 24 at 15:47 KST, Upbit announced a temporary suspension of deposit and withdrawal services for APT due to maintenance on the APT wallet. Following this, at 22:32 KST on the same day, Upbit explained that system maintenance was undertaken after identifying an unusual attempt linked to APT deposits. The crypto exchange went on to announce that the deposit and withdrawal services for APT would resume at 23:00 KST on the same day.DeFi degenerates’ insightsIn relation to this incident, Definalist, a group of DeFi degenerates based in Korea, shared insights on X (formerly Twitter). The group stated: “It seems that during the process of reflecting $APT coin deposits, there was a failure to check the type arguments, and all same functions transfers were recognized as the same APT native token. … If all APT ecosystem tokens were sent to Upbit’s wallet, they would have been mistakenly treated as APT native coins.”Decimal place differenceDefinalist also remarked on the fortunate nature of the counterfeit APT token having six decimal places, in contrast to the authentic APT token’s eight. They noted that if the deceptive token had mirrored the genuine token’s decimal places, the market disruption could have amplified a hundredfold. Meanwhile, the value of the counterfeit APT tokens deposited into Upbit is estimated to be about KRW 20 million (approximately $15,000).

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Apr 24, 2023

SAI.TECH Consolidates Mining Product Offering

Singapore’s SAI.TECH, a bitcoin miner and mining infrastructure hardware developer, has chosen to consolidate its product offering. The company has simplified its product range by categorizing them as Ultiaas, Boltbit, and Heatnuc. Virtual annual conferenceThe company took the opportunity to host SAITIME 2023, a virtual corporate annual conference, using the event as a platform to announce its SAIHUB product consolidation.Ultiaas will focus on the development of hardware and software products alongside integrated solutions, in order to enable liquid cooling and heat reuse capabilities while attempting to achieve optimized energy efficiency. In practical terms, these products convert mining chip heat into reusable energy.The team behind the Ultiaas product line believes that the technology can have a significant positive effect on data centers through the harnessing of chip heat in commercial, residential, industrial and agricultural locations. The firm has thoroughly tested the product, with its first successful operation at its testing and distribution facility in Ohio in the United States. According to a press release, the company says that “we look to tap into the state’s vast reservoir of clean energy.” With that, it is already working on the construction of a second site.The green bitcoin mining specialist recycles 90% of the waste heat produced in the mining process, thanks to the technology that it has developed.Boltbit concerns itself with the provision of decentralized transaction system services and technical support. It focuses on blockchain and lightning network technology. Lastly, Heatnuc will focus on the research and promotion of small modular reactors. Unusual price actionThe company, which listed on the Nasdaq last year following a special purpose acquisition companies (SPAC) merger in 2021, was the center of some speculative interest last week. The firm’s shares surged by over 360% to a high of $7.42 in one day’s trading. A week on, the share price has calmed down, trading at $3.68 on Friday. The rationale behind the short-lived share price surge remains a mystery. Kazakhstan scale-backIn August of last year, SAI.TECH decided to scale back an active bitcoin mining site that it is involved in in Kazakhstan. A second phase of the project would have brought 90 MW online. It is still working on phase 1 which will bring 15 MW online.Kazakhstan had seen an influx of bitcoin miners in the wake of a China mining ban a few years ago. The sudden surge in energy consumption on the Kazakh energy grid upset the national power supply, resulting in protests and riots. The country then pushed back against the miners, disconnecting many projects from the grid. It was against this background that it’s understood SAI.TECH decided to scale back its plans in the landlocked Eurasian country.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

May 29, 2023

Temasek Cuts Pay Following FTX Autopsy

Temasek Cuts Pay Following FTX AutopsySingaporean state-owned investment firm, Temasek Holdings, has announced a reduction in compensation for executives responsible for the company’s investment in the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Temasek, once the second-largest outside investor in FTX, faced scrutiny after the collapse of the exchange.Photo by Emilio Takas on UnsplashNo misconduct findingOn May 29, Temasek released a statement confirming the completion of its internal review of the $275 million investment loss incurred from FTX. The review determined that there was “no misconduct” within the company. However, both the investment team and senior management took “collective accountability” and experienced a reduction in their compensation.While acknowledging the inherent risks associated with any investment, Temasek emphasized the importance of continuing to invest in new sectors and emerging technologies to understand their potential impact on the business and financial models of existing portfolios. They recognized the need to adapt to an ever-changing world and explore avenues that could drive future value.It’s worth noting that the $275 million loss from the FTX investment constituted only 0.09% of Temasek’s portfolio value, which stood at over $293 billion at the time of the collapse.Temasek maintained that it conducted extensive due diligence before investing in FTX, emphasizing its commitment to a thorough review process. Chairman Lim Boon Heng stated in a May 29 interview with Bloomberg that there was fraudulent conduct intentionally hidden from investors, including Temasek. The negative outcome of the investment has been disappointing for the company and has had a significant impact on its reputation.Reputational damageSingapore Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong echoed similar sentiments, highlighting the financial loss and reputational damage caused by the FTX collapse during a parliamentary meeting in November 2022.During the due diligence process, Temasek reviewed FTX’s financial statements, assessed regulatory risks related to financial service providers in the cryptocurrency market, and sought legal advice. The company also engaged with individuals who had firsthand knowledge of FTX, including employees, investors, and industry participants.In recent news, Temasek addressed and dismissed rumors about a $10 million investment in Array, a developer of algorithmic currency systems based on smart contracts and artificial intelligence. The company clarified that such reports were incorrect, refuting the circulating news articles and tweets.Temasek’s internal review process is certainly a move towards transparency and accountability. It indicates a willingness towards addressing the matter. That said, there are FTX creditor groups who fervently disagree with Temasek’s analysis.Class action lawsuitEarlier this year a number of FTX creditors filed a class action lawsuit against a number of venture capital (VC) firms, including Temasek. The FTX customers maintain that Temasek and others played a role in a conspiracy to defraud them. Venture capital firms have countered with the view that they themselves were victims as a consequence of the FTX collapse, suffering multi-million dollar losses.The fact remains that VCs get much further involved than merely handing over a check. They get involved with marketing, operations, and many other facets of the businesses of their portfolio companies. Meanwhile, other creditors suggest that Temasek has a responsibility to do right by the 1.4 million FTX creditors (a disproportionate number of them being Singapore-based) and to invest in a restructured FTX business, an option that represents the best opportunity for FTX customers to recover their funds.Temasek may have reached certain conclusions by way of their internal report on the matter but this is not likely to be the final analysis relative to its involvement in the fall of FTX.

news
Loading