Top

NFTs not subject to South Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act

Policy & Regulation·December 13, 2023, 7:43 AM

In anticipation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act coming into effect in July of next year, the South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has issued an advance notice regarding its subordinate statutes.

Photo by Ethan Brooke on Unsplash

 

Seven specific provisions

The subsidiary regulations under the Act detail seven specific provisions aligned with the Act’s objectives. Firstly, assets categorized as electronic securities, mobile vouchers, deposit tokens backed by the Bank of Korea’s central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) will not be classified as virtual assets and hence, not regulated by this Act. However, in instances where NFTs are used as a means of payment for specific goods or services, they will be regarded as virtual assets.

Secondly, banks will take responsibility for managing the deposits of users on cryptocurrency exchanges. This aligns with the Act’s requirement for virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to keep users’ funds separate from their own, either by depositing them in, or entrusting them to, reputable institutions. Under these regulations, banks are required to manage users’ assets in a manner consistent with how investors’ deposits are handled under the Capital Markets Act. This means that banks are allowed to invest VASP users’ assets only in secure instruments, such as state and local government bonds, and are also obligated to pay fees to deposit owners, taking into account the yields of these investments.

 

80% of user assets in cold wallets

The third key aspect of the regulations is that VASPs are required to store a minimum of 80% of user assets in cold wallets, which are not connected to the internet. This is higher than the current requirement of 70%, enhancing the security measures for users of virtual assets. To calculate the total value of a virtual asset at any given time, its total supply is multiplied by its average daily price over the past year. VASPs are obligated to assess the value of virtual assets every month.

The fourth regulation mandates that VASPs must enroll in an insurance plan, contribute to a rainy day fund or accumulate reserves. This is to ensure they can fulfill their compensation responsibilities in the event of incidents like security breaches or technical failures. The required preparation amount is set at a minimum of 5% of the user assets stored in hot wallets, as these are more susceptible to risks. VASPs are required to update their compensation thresholds or reserves monthly and must take any necessary actions to comply with these requirements by the next working day following the update.

 

Information disclosure guidelines

Another regulation addresses the issue of insider trading in the context of the virtual asset market. Under the current Capital Markets Act, information is considered disclosed when it’s made available through disclosure systems of the FSC or the Korea Exchange (KRX). However, since the cryptocurrency market lacks a similar system, the new statute provides criteria for determining when information is deemed disclosed.

For instance, if a VASP, including exchanges, releases crucial information about a virtual asset on an exchange and six hours pass, that information is regarded as disclosed. This acknowledges the non-stop nature of the crypto market. Moreover, information disclosed post 6 p.m. is treated as officially disclosed after 9 a.m. the next day.

Additionally, if a virtual asset issuer publishes significant information about its token on a website hosting its white paper, the information is deemed public after one day. This is conditional upon the website being publicly accessible and having consistently provided important token information for the preceding six months.

These rules aim to provide clarity and fairness in information disclosure in the crypto market, adapting the principles of traditional financial markets to the unique dynamics of virtual assets.

 

No arbitrary suspension of transactions

The sixth regulation restricts VASPs from arbitrarily halting deposits and withdrawals of virtual assets unless there are justifiable reasons for such actions. Acceptable circumstances for suspending these transactions include situations where the VASP experiences a technical disruption in its system, where regulatory authorities instruct a VASP to cease deposits and withdrawals or where cyberattacks or similar incidents have occurred or are clearly imminent.

Lastly, virtual asset exchanges are required to monitor for abnormal transactions continuously. These are transactions that show substantial shifts in the prices or trading volumes of virtual assets, particularly in response to news or rumors that could influence cryptocurrency prices. If VASPs suspect unfair trading practices, they must report to the FSC or the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). When there is ample evidence of such activities, crypto exchanges are obligated to notify the police or the prosecutors’ office. In addition, the financial regulator has the authority to levy fines based on the prosecution’s decisions or after completing consultations with the prosecution if a year has passed since the day of the report.

During the period of advance notice, which spans from Nov. 11 to Jan. 22, the FSC will seek comments from relevant organizations, experts and businesses. This process is aimed at refining the rules and regulations subordinate to the Virtual Asset User Protection Act. Moving forward, the financial authorities plan to publish a set of guidelines and Q&A materials and conduct explanatory sessions, with the goal of ensuring a smooth implementation of the Act.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Dec 24, 2024

Korea's Busan city utilizes blockchain to advance shipping and coffee industries

The Busan Port Authority (BPA) recently announced its plan to deploy a blockchain-based transshipment monitoring system known as Port-i at the port of Busan, located in the southern part of South Korea, according to local news outlet Financial News. The Port-i system is designed to streamline the management of transshipment cargo for shipping companies at Busan Port, which handles about 12.4 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) annually. The system is set for a pilot phase in January 2025, with plans to expand it to all shipping companies using the port by the second half of 2025.Photo by Christopher Lee on UnsplashEnhancing efficiency and profitability in shippingWith Port-i, shipping companies will be able to track ships and cargo through the Chain Portal, Busan Port’s integrated logistics platform. Port-i will provide a unified view of berth schedules across all terminals at the port, addressing the current issue where companies have to separately check ship and cargo statuses and independently identify berth schedules at different terminals. The BPA expects that the Port-i service will allow shipping companies to manage transshipment cargo more efficiently, improve ship loading rates and potentially increase profits. Blockchain for coffee quality controlIn addition to the Port-i initiative, Busan is also exploring other uses of blockchain technology for industrial development. The city recently set up the Busan Coffee R&D Lab, backed by the Ministry of Science and ICT, as reported by Metro.  This facility aims to use blockchain to create a platform that enhances the logistics of coffee sourcing and production, including a system that assigns unique identification to coffee products. It will provide reliable data required to control taste and quality. By integrating blockchain with artificial intelligence and advanced logistics techniques, Busan is positioning itself at the forefront of the coffee industry with innovative business models. 

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Aug 10, 2023

Parameta and Solbric Korea to Create First Solar Power Plant Security Token Platform in Korea

Parameta and Solbric Korea to Create First Solar Power Plant Security Token Platform in KoreaSouth Korean blockchain company Parameta (formerly known as Iconloop) said Tuesday it entered a business deal with Solbric Korea, a subsidiary of solar energy innovation company Next Solar Energy, to jointly establish the country’s first solar power plant security token platform that allows investors to make fractional investments in solar energy.Photo by Nuno Marques on UnsplashReceiving approval as an innovative financial serviceIn order to establish such a platform that designates solar power plants as underlying assets, they will jointly apply for a financial regulatory sandbox — a program introduced by the Korean government that offers a special and provisional regulatory exemption for financial services that have been recognized for their innovativeness.Once the platform is recognized under the sandbox as an innovative financial service, the two companies will work together on the issuance and distribution of security tokens.Expanding opportunities to invest in solar energyUltimately, Solbric aims to build a platform that brings security token technology to the solar power sector, which, until now, has presented limited investment opportunities for individual investors in Korea. It will allow them to trade securities and make small-scale, fractional investments in solar power plants.To do so, Solbric intends to leverage the knowledge and expertise of its parent company, Next Solar Energy — an experienced veteran in the solar plant industry.As its partner, Parameta will provide the necessary blockchain technology for constructing and managing the platform based on its security token offering service, Parameta S. This service uses tokens to allow fractional management of real-world assets (RWAs), making it easy to invest in and organize them. This offers more liquidity and flexibility compared to traditional investment methods.“We will focus on providing investment returns to platform users as well as the unique experience of owning various solar power plants,” said Kang Jae-won, the CEO of Solbric Korea.Increased institutional supportThis project is made possible by the recent upturn in institutional support from Korean financial authorities that allows more security token offerings. Last month, the Korean Financial Services Commission ultimately granted regulatory exemptions to several fractional investment firms that have successfully completed the business reorganization as requested by the regulator. The Financial Supervisory Service has also decided to allow fractional investment businesses to apply for investment contract securities.Taking advantage of this momentum, Solbric and Parameta plan to continually explore diverse business opportunities to establish their platform.“We are currently working with various specialized companies, including Solbric, to expand our security token businesses in various fields such as solar power plants, mobility, real estate non-performing loans, carbon emission rights, and electric vehicle batteries,” said Kim Jong-hyup, CEO of Parameta.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 20, 2023

Regulatory Caution Among Asian Nations Amid Reports of Illicit Financing

Regulatory Caution Among Asian Nations Amid Reports of Illicit FinancingWith a plethora of reports of crypto-related terrorist financing having been published in recent weeks, it’s understood that Asian nations may be looking to exercise caution when it comes to the current ongoing process of establishing regulatory guidelines for crypto.That’s according to a report published by the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Thursday. The use of cryptocurrency by Hamas to fund its attack on Israel is being seen as the catalyst that may drive authorities in various Asian nations to take a more cautious approach to regulating digital currencies, according to analysts cited by the publication.Raj Kapoor, the founder of India Blockchain Alliance (IBA), commented on these recent developments, stating:”It is a kick on the backside for most governments. All regulatory bodies will take a closer look at crypto regulation. Governments will need to start implementing new rules and regulations.”At the recent G20 summit held in New Delhi, a joint declaration called for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of crypto assets, among other measures. The declaration emphasized the importance of supporting “a coordinated and comprehensive policy and regulatory framework.”Kapoor stressed the importance of revisiting the declaration and developing solutions to implement its objectives.Photo by Adolfo Félix on UnsplashRenewed scrutinyEvents in Palestine in recent weeks have led to renewed scrutiny when it comes to monitoring illicit financing activity via cryptocurrency. Only days following the recent Hamas attack, Israeli authorities moved to freeze specified crypto accounts.That scrutiny has continued in recent days, with more accounts having been frozen on crypto platforms such as Binance, while more still have been identified as suspicious, with requests for further information having been submitted in respect of over 200 additional accounts.On Wednesday it emerged that the United States Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) had sanctioned a Gaza-based crypto platform.Potential over-reactionWhile crypto-related terrorist financing has been widely publicized, blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis warned on Wednesday that crypto’s role in this illicit activity has likely been overstated. In its blog post on the subject, the firm stated:“Although terrorism financing is a very small portion of the already very small portion of cryptocurrency transaction volume that is illicit, some terrorist organizations raise, store, and transfer funds using cryptocurrency.”Additionally, Chainalysis stated that it had seen “overstated metrics and flawed analyses of these terrorist groups’ use of cryptocurrency.” Peter Van Valkenburgh, Director of Research at non-profit crypto advocacy group Coin Center, also believes that reporting on the matter is not balanced. Taking to X, he stated:“Sensational early reporting on the scale of Hamas crypto fundraising significantly misstated the amounts involved.”Coin Center’s Director of Communications, Neeraj Agrawal, highlighted an article which claimed that crypto “fueled Hamas’ terror attack on Israel” in its title, only to reveal within the body of the article that “cryptocurrency is still far from the largest funding source for terrorism.”Anndy Lian, a Singapore-based author and inter-governmental blockchain adviser, noted that while some countries may consider banning cryptocurrencies as a solution, this could merely drive illicit financing underground and make it more challenging to trace and halt. Lian argued that cryptocurrencies are traceable and trackable, unlike traditional fiat currencies like US dollars.

news
Loading