NADA Protocol joins hands with AIgorithm X for global investment opportunities

Fonte Capital, an Astana-based investment management company that allocates capital across a broad range of asset classes, including digital assets, launched a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) in Kazakhstan’s capital city on Aug. 13. The firm is based within the Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC), with the launch prompting AIFC Governor Renat Bekturov to take to X to outline that the product offering is the first spot Bitcoin ETF to be listed within the Central Asian region.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashReflecting Bitcoin price dynamicsThe product has been listed on the Astana International Exchange (AIX) and has been assigned the ticker “BETF.” In announcing the offering, Fonte claimed that the ETF “aims to accurately reflect the price dynamics of bitcoin, striving to achieve this performance before fees and fund obligations.”Shares in the ETF are listed in U.S. dollars, with the fund having a “non-exempt” classification, meaning that it can be offered to a broad range of investors, including non-qualified retail investors. Each ETF share will be fully backed by Bitcoin, with Fonte having partnered with BitGo for digital asset custody.  Delivering institutional-grade accessTaking to social media, BitGo described the product offering as a “new era for digital assets” in Kazakhstan. The company asserted that through what it termed “U.S.-regulated cold storage,” the new fund is delivering institutional-grade access to Bitcoin within the region for the first time. Fonte pointed out that the fund “provides investors with a regulated and secure way to include Bitcoin in their investment portfolios without the complexities associated with holding and transferring the underlying asset.” This isn’t the first Bitcoin-related product that the AIX has listed. Back in 2021, it listed iX Bitcoin Exchange Traded Notes, with special purpose company iX Bitcoin SPC Limited acting as the note issuer.  The product differs from the Fonte ETF in that it is backed by shares of ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF, a future-based ETF first listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in 2021. In comparison, Fonte’s product has the advantage of being directly backed by Bitcoin. The ETF’s backers have pointed out that there are further implications for the ETF’s shareholders. As the product is regulated by the AIFC, Fonte asserts that within that jurisdiction, holders of the product’s shares are protected from the potential reach of international sanctions. In this regard, the product offers further protection as it is not dependent upon overseas issuers.  Overall, the AIFC has played a key role in the development of crypto within Kazakhstan over the course of the last few years. In 2023, it awarded crypto exchanges Bybit and Binance approval to trade within the Central Asian nation.  Binance subsequently launched a local crypto exchange platform in Kazakhstan, achieving full licensing in October 2024. In June of this year, the authority granted its first license for the issuance of a fiat-backed stablecoin.  It emerged recently that Kazakhstan is working towards the establishment of a national crypto reserve, with the administrators of the country’s sovereign wealth fund expressing the desire to commence investment in crypto assets.

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm MisrepresentationThe Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.Photo by Marcel Eberle on UnsplashBanking ordinance violationsIn a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.Misuse of banking termsAny entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.

Authorities in China have disclosed that Yao Qian, a prominent figure in the country's blockchain industry and former head of China's central bank digital currency institute, is under investigation by the nation's anti-graft watchdog. The announcement was made on Friday, revealing that Yao is "suspected of serious violations of discipline and law." However, specific details regarding the nature of the investigation were not provided.Photo by Max van den Oetelaar on UnsplashCareer and recent roleYao Qian currently holds the position of head of the technology regulation department at the China Securities Regulatory Commission. Earlier in the month, he authored an opinion piece titled “Warnings Mount Over Novel Bitcoin ETFs That Have Taken the U.S. by Storm” on Caixin, a prominent Chinese financial news platform. Born in 1970, Yao initially served as the inaugural head of China's central bank digital currency research institute in 2017 before transitioning to the securities regulator in 2018. Contributions to blockchain discourseThroughout his career, Yao Qian has been actively involved in discussions surrounding blockchain technology. In 2022, he published a book covering various topics within the blockchain space, including DAOs, DeFi, NFTs and X-to-earn models. In the foreword of his book, Yao emphasized the growing significance of Web3 innovation, noting it as a development direction of high importance and value for nations. Lack of specifics surrounding investigationThe announcement of Yao Qian's investigation has left many observers in the blockchain industry with questions, as authorities did not provide clear reasons for the probe. Despite his past contributions and current role in technology regulation, the investigation raises uncertainties about Yao's future involvement in the blockchain sector and his standing within Chinese regulatory circles. As developments unfold, stakeholders within the blockchain community will continue to monitor the situation surrounding Yao Qian's investigation and its potential implications for China's blockchain policies and initiatives.