Ripple Pursues International Growth Via Dubai Expansion

Terraform Labs Co-Founder Indicted in South KoreaTen individuals linked to the Terra USD collapse have been indicted in South Korea on charges associated with violations of capital markets law, including the Co-Founder of Terraform Labs, Daniel Shin. That’s according to a report published by Bloomberg on Tuesday.©Pexels/Donald TongTwo of the ten were charged with breach of trust while the remaining eight, including Shin, were charged with illegal trading. Prosecutors confirmed that all of the charged individuals have ties to Terraform Labs, the company responsible for developing the Terra protocol, and the Terra USD (TUSD) stablecoin and Luna cryptocurrency which collapsed in 2022.It’s understood that the ten individuals were also accused of illegal disclosure of clients’ payment information and the embezzlement of corporate funds. The authorities have claimed that the ten individuals are responsible for causing “astronomical damage” to investors. They estimate that all ten of them took 463 billion won, around $347 million, in profit.Business interestsShin co-founded Terraform Labs with Do Kwon in 2018. He left the project in 2020, long before its spectacular failure in 2022. However, he would have profited considerably from the project. Prior to co-founding Terraform Labs, Shin had founded lifestyle commerce company TMON in 2010. Two years later, he founded venture capital and private equity firm, Fast Track Asia while in 2017 he was a founding partner of another venture capital and private equity firm, Bass Investment.He remains involved in all of those other businesses. Furthermore, Shin founded integrated payments firm PortOne Global in January 2020, immediately upon exiting Terraform Labs. He remains CEO of PortOne Global today.$185 million frozenOn Tuesday, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor’s Office outlined that it had frozen assets to the value of 246.8 billion won, approximately $185 million, belonging to those that it has brought charges against. South Korean authorities had previously acknowledged a difficulty in seizing assets related to Terraform Labs Co-Founder Do Kwon. It’s understood that a transfer of funds from Do Kwon to a prominent South Korean law firm is being investigated. Otherwise, the search for funds has led them overseas where it’s understood that Do Kwon purchased real estate in his mother’s name in the United States in a bid to evade asset confiscation.Free pending trialShin remains at liberty pending trial. Back in December, a South Korean court turned down a request to arrest him on the basis that he wasn’t likely to destroy evidence and wouldn’t pose a flight risk.That hasn’t proven to be the case where his former colleague Do Kwon is concerned. Do Kwon fled to Montenegro where he was recently charged with having entered the country on false documents. Both South Korea and the United States have formally applied for his extradition. In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has sued both Do Kwon and Terraform Labs. Terraform Labs subsequently submitted a request to the courts in the US to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming the SEC lacks jurisdiction.

Gyeonggi Officials with Cryptocurrencies Clear of Professional Conflicts in Virtual AssetsGyeonggi Province, South Korea’s most populated province surrounding the national capital of Seoul, announced on October 26 (local time) that the duties of all crypto-holding officials ranked 4 or higher in the provincial government are not associated with virtual assets. In Korea, public officials are ranked from nine to one, with one being the highest position.In anticipation of the amended Public Service Ethics Act coming into effect on December 14, the Gyeonggi provincial government introduced a revised employee code of conduct in August. This required officials of rank 4 or higher to report their crypto holdings within 10 days starting from August 21.Photo by Nattu Adnan on UnsplashReported crypto ownershipThe result indicated that out of 228 officials, 23 reported owning virtual assets. Among these, 15 officials held cryptocurrencies valued at less than KRW 1 million ($738), while the remaining 8 had holdings exceeding that amount.To determine any potential involvement with cryptocurrencies in their official duties, the Gyeonggi government examined the roles and responsibilities of these officials within their respective departments. Following this review, the matter was forwarded to the Gyeonggi Public Service Ethics Committee for further scrutiny.Ethics committee reviewOn October 20, the committee convened to assess the relationship between the officials’ duties and their crypto holdings. They unanimously concluded that none of the 23 officials had any ties to crypto in their official roles.The newly revised code of conduct elaborates on the conditions under which a public official’s responsibilities are associated with virtual assets. Specifically, an official’s duties are considered linked to virtual assets if they are involved in formulating or implementing crypto-related policies or laws; conducting related investigations, inquiries, or inspections; engaging in the registration and oversight of cryptocurrency exchanges; or if they are involved in supporting or overseeing the development of crypto technologies.In light of these definitions, officials who engage in any of the above roles are strictly prohibited from capitalizing on any crypto-related information they encounter during their professional duties for personal trading or investment. Furthermore, officials who either currently shoulder or have previously carried out such responsibilities are required to disclose any crypto holdings they acquire.In the future, once the revised Ethics Act is implemented, the Gyeonggi government will remain fully committed to preventing conflicts of interest among public officials. To bolster these efforts, Gyeonggi will introduce additional measures, including a thorough verification process for the accuracy of their cryptocurrency holdings reports.In situations where a public official with cryptocurrency holdings is assigned a position related to virtual assets, Gyeonggi will issue individualized instructions. These directives may entail either the liquidation of their cryptocurrency holdings or their removal from the specific role in question.Meanwhile, Gyeonggi will enhance its endeavors to furnish educational resources pertaining to virtual asset reporting. Moreover, the local government will restrict officials from holding virtual assets if they fall under financial disclosure obligations and are deemed to possess information about or exert influence on virtual assets.

Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA), the nation's primary financial regulator, has recently proposed a series of measures aimed at safeguarding users against "unlawful transfers" to cryptocurrency exchanges. This move, however, may pose significant challenges to the peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions market. Bolstering user protection measuresCiting findings from the National Police Agency, which highlight that damages resulting from specialized fraud involving unlawful money transfers are predominantly facilitated through cryptocurrency, the FSA has urged financial institutions to bolster user protection measures. The agency emphasized the importance of assessing risks associated with transfers to crypto-asset exchange service providers. In a request published on Wednesday directed towards Japanese banks, the FSA underscored the persistently high incidence of fraudulent transactions in the country, facilitated through crypto. To address this concern, the FSA and the National Police Agency have proposed various initiatives. One such initiative entails directing banks to enhance monitoring of unlawful transfers to cryptocurrency exchange service providers.Photo by Jayjayli on UnsplashPeer-to-peer (P2P) market implicationsHowever, another proposal from the regulator may have a profound impact on the P2P market. The FSA suggests halting transfers to cryptocurrency exchange service providers if the sender's name differs from the account name. This recommendation, explained in the Japanese version of the press release using the term "reject," implies the suspension of such transfers from both individual and corporate accounts. For users of P2P platforms, where transactions often involve different names between the sender's and receiver's fiat and crypto accounts, this directive could significantly disrupt the market. Rejecting transactions from an individual's bank account to another individual’s crypto wallet could undermine the functionality of P2P transactions. Positive crypto developmentsDespite this potential issue needing to be clarified and resolved and the East Asian nation not having a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies in place, Japan is showing indications of gearing up for broader adoption. The Bank of Japan (BoJ) is preparing to pilot a Japanese central bank digital currency (CBDC) pegged to the Japanese yen.In June of last year, the country established a legal framework for stablecoins. Additionally, the FSA has proposed a legislative amendment to support the development of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) in Japan. The proposed amendment aims to designate potential DAO tokens as "Limited Company Type DAO Employee Rights Tokens," granting holders legal rights akin to regular limited liability company (LLC) members. Last December the Japanese government considered and later acted on revising crypto tax policy to exempt unrealized crypto gains from being taxed. This proposal was originally put forward by the FSA earlier in 2023. In another development, authorities in the city of Kochi signed an agreement on Feb. 7 to virtualize the city on the Start Lands metaverse application, with plans to welcome online tourists later this summer. Despite these most recent recommendations from the FSA potentially signaling a less crypto-friendly stance, the Japanese authorities have otherwise demonstrated that they’re working towards creating workable conditions for the development of crypto and Web3 within the country.