Netmarble’s MARBLEX Bolsters Partnership with Bisonai to Elevate MBX Ecosystem

Korean Crypto Expert Claims NFTs and Security Tokens Shouldn’t Be a Priority for Investors YetAlthough there has been a lot of speculation recently regarding the prospects of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and security tokens as lucrative investment opportunities, these topics should not be of concern yet, said Kim Dong-hwan, CEO of Korean crypto consulting firm Wonder Frame, at Tuesday’s 2023 FNTimes Investment Forum hosted in Seoul by the Korean Financial Times.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashFrom a price-to-earnings perspective, these types of investments should not be of priority to the average investor, Kim said, stating that this argument is rooted in historical context. Bitcoin, the kingpin of cryptocurrencies, had its first breakthrough in 2012 when its price was around $13. Since then, its value has skyrocketed nearly 2,000 times. Those who profited from Bitcoin then went on to invest in Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization. Ultimately, the money earned from Bitcoin was constantly circulating in the crypto market.Grappling for liquidityHowever, Bitcoin’s liquidity — the frequency at which assets are bought and sold, which can be deemed the most important aspect of investing in and trading cryptocurrencies — is currently down. Liquidity in the crypto market usually flows in order from Bitcoin first, to altcoins, then to NFTs, Kim explained, because investments in NFTs are made by people who hold cryptocurrencies, not Korean won. Therefore, NFTs, which have now experienced more than a 90% decline from their peak, must depend on Bitcoin’s price recovery for their own resurgence.Securing liquidity for security tokens is also difficult, considering the fact that while these assets share common characteristics with cryptocurrencies, they are subject to strict regulatory oversight by financial authorities such as the Korea Exchange. Therein lies the difficulty in forecasting the prospects for security tokens.Kim thus questioned whether there would be market makers or liquidity providers that would be willing to boldly step into the role of satisfying the market, given the close scrutiny of authorities such as Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) and Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). Although crypto exchanges like Upbit act as market makers by facilitating daily trading worth trillions of won, speculation suggests that securities firms that are responsible for supplying security token liquidity may find it challenging to do the same.Weak investments and negative perceptions of DeFiAnother concern for security tokens is fractional investments, which tend to be concentrated on assets of lower value. “Security tokens are fundamentally about dividing underlying assets and then selling them. However, in many cases, these underlying assets are of lower value or have no choice but to be traded this way,” Kim said.Kim also mentioned the regulatory hurdles hindering decentralized finance (DeFi) in general, despite its reputed appeal. “DeFi is perceived by international organizations like the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the US Federal Reserve System, and the European Union (EU) as a public enemy that causes financial instability in the real world,” he said.Taking all these factors into consideration, Kim recommended against investing in security tokens or NFTs at this time, given the current situation where even Bitcoin’s liquidity is at an all-time low. He suggested that, with market interest rates approaching 5%, unless there is a specific need to invest in virtual assets, it may be better to explore investment options positioned for higher interest rates.Kim is an industry expert who has previously written articles for crypto news site CoinDesk Korea for four years and has taken on the role of Chief Business Development Officer (CBDO) at Blitz Labs, a virtual asset research firm. He founded Wonder Frame in 2022, where he currently works as a professional consultant.

Bybit Suspends UK Services Due to New Marketing RegulationsDubai-based crypto exchange Bybit has taken the proactive decision to suspend services in the UK market ahead of the impending implementation of new cryptocurrency marketing regulations by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).Photo by Nick Fewings on UnsplashNew marketing rulesThe FCA is set to enforce these rules starting next month, marking a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for crypto businesses operating in the United Kingdom. In an official announcement published on its website on Friday, Bybit stated: “In light of the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s introduction of new rules regarding marketing and communications by crypto businesses as outlined in the June 2023 Policy Statement (PS23/6) entitled ‘Financial Promotion Rules for Crypto assets,’ Bybit has made a choice to embrace the regulation proactively and pause our services in this market.”Efforts to remainLast week, there had been speculation that the crypto exchange platform would be exiting the UK market. However, Bybit responded on September 14, stating that it intended to maintain its presence in the UK over the long term.Clearly these new rules are proving to be an insurmountable challenge for the exchange platform, given its more recent decision to pause its services. The new rules aim to introduce a cooling-off period for first-time investors, with the ultimate goal of enhancing the transparency and accuracy of crypto product marketing.Their implementation has drawn criticism from within the industry. On Thursday, Nic Carter, Co-Founder of blockchain data aggregator Coinmetrics.io and Partner at Web3-focused venture capital firm Castle Island Ventures, shared his thoughts on the new regulations via X (formerly Twitter): “I have a hard time taking the UK seriously as a domicile for crypto companies based on their completely ludicrous advertising law — clown country.”Withdrawal timelineBybit has outlined a timeline for its withdrawal from the UK market. Starting from October 1, the exchange will no longer accept new user account applications from UK residents.Subsequently, on October 8, coinciding with the enforcement of the new regulations, existing UK users will no longer be able to “make any new deposits, create new contracts, or increase any of their existing positions for all products and services.” However, users will retain the ability to reduce or close their positions and withdraw their funds from the platform.Bybit has set a final deadline of January 8, 2024, for UK customers to manage and wind down their remaining positions. Any positions left open after this date will be automatically liquidated, with the resulting funds made available for withdrawal.While the duration of Bybit’s suspension in the UK remains uncertain, the exchange has expressed its commitment to aligning with UK regulatory requirements in the future. Bybit stated: “The suspension will allow the company to focus its efforts and resources on being able to best meet the regulations outlined by the UK authorities in the future.”Bybit is not the only crypto exchange affected by the UK’s regulatory changes. Other major platforms, including OKX and Binance, are reassessing their strategies in response to the FCA’s stringent guidelines. The new rules have broad implications, with even having a website accessible to UK customers potentially being considered a promotional activity.

Zipmex, the Asian digital asset exchange, faces another setback as the Securities and Exchange Commission Board of Thailand (SEC Board) moves to recommend the revocation of its digital asset business license. This decision, announced last week, marks the latest in a series of challenges for the exchange, which has struggled to navigate the complexities of the crypto market's downturn.Photo by Oleksandr P on PexelsCapital requirements failureThe SEC's recommendation stems from Zipmex's failure to meet the increased net capital requirement and address deficiencies in its personnel and management structure. These shortcomings were deemed unacceptable by the regulatory body, prompting a 15-day ultimatum issued on Feb. 1. Earlier this month, the Commission ordered a halt to Zipmex operations, enforcing a temporary suspension until such time as the company had improved its financial position and applied needed changes to its management structure.Despite this window for compliance, Zipmex fell short of meeting the specified conditions, leading to the current proposal for license revocation and the imposition of stringent regulatory measures on Thailand's digital asset exchanges. Business suspension extensionDuring a meeting on Feb. 21, the SEC further resolved to extend Zipmex's business suspension, initiated on Feb. 1, and allowed clients to request asset returns on the exchange until March 11. Any unclaimed assets after this date will be required to be placed in a "trusted and secured system," with Zipmex obligated to report this to the SEC. Notably, even after the potential revocation of its license, Zipmex will retain its status as a limited company, subject to associated rights, responsibilities and liabilities, including the possibility of legal action. Zipmex's woes trace back to 2022 when it faced significant challenges due to exposure to failed crypto lender Babel Finance. In July of that year, the exchange suspended withdrawals for weeks due to concerns over its ties to crypto lenders Babel and Celsius, both facing financial distress. Although access to Trade Wallets was restored after three days, Z Wallets remained inaccessible into the following year. Failed Coinbase and V Ventures dealsIn the midst of its troubles, Zipmex attracted interest from Coinbase, albeit without success. While Coinbase made a strategic investment in Zipmex, the acquisition attempt did not materialize as initially intended. Furthermore, Zipmex's financial struggles led it to file for debt relief in Singapore in July 2022, further complicating its position in the market. The exchange's regulatory challenges continued as it faced scrutiny from the SEC regarding compliance with the Digital Assets Act. Despite attempts to secure acquisition deals, such as the proposed acquisition by Thai investor V Ventures, Zipmex has been unable to alleviate regulatory concerns or stabilize its operations effectively. Since obtaining its license from the SEC in January 2020, Zipmex has operated in Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore and Australia. However, its inability to address regulatory requirements and financial challenges has cast doubt on its future viability in these markets.  In November of last year, the company itself announced a temporary cessation of trading in Thailand while it worked towards becoming compliant within that jurisdiction. Earlier this month, Thailand’s SEC took legal action against Akarlap Yimwilai, the former CEO of Zipmex Thailand.