Lotte Group’s Bellygom NFT Project Garners Global Fanbase of Over 300K

Singapore’s Terraform Labs, the company founded by incarcerated crypto entrepreneur Do Kwon, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection as a mechanism to shield itself from potential severe penalties in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) securities fraud lawsuit.Photo by Melinda Gimpel on UnsplashPursuing an appealThe bankruptcy filing, submitted on Tuesday in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, aims to allow Terraform Labs to pursue an appeal against the SEC's allegations. In the filing, Terraform Labs CEO Chris Amani emphasized the critical nature of the bankruptcy protection for the company's ongoing operations, preservation of value for creditors, including the Terra community, and the pursuit of an appeal against the SEC enforcement action. Amani expressed concerns that, without Chapter 11 protection, the company could face liquidation after the trial, forfeiting its right to appeal and leading to disastrous consequences for its business. Having acted as Terraform’s chief operating officer earlier in 2023, last July Amani was appointed as the firm’s CEO. Protection afforded by Chapter 11The estimated assets and liabilities of Terraform Labs fall between $100 million and $500 million, as disclosed in the firm’s bankruptcy filing earlier this month. Amani highlighted the potential financial strain resulting from a substantial money judgment, indicating that the company might not be able to satisfy such a judgment or post the necessary supersedeas bond for an appeal, a bond that must be provided by a petitioner who attempts to have a judgment set aside, without the protection afforded by Chapter 11. The SEC charged Terraform Labs and former CEO Do Kwon with securities fraud in February 2023, accusing them of orchestrating a "multi-billion dollar crypto asset securities fraud." The Commission claimed the company raised billions from investors through unregistered transactions, offering an interconnected suite of crypto asset securities. Terraform Labs disputes the SEC's summary judgment decision, asserting that the cryptocurrency tokens in question are not securities under the Acts and that the SEC's jurisdiction is not applicable. The potential consequences of liquidation extend beyond the company itself, impacting hundreds of thousands of Luna cryptocurrency holders, the same individuals the SEC purportedly seeks to protect. Luna operates on the Terra blockchain maintained by Terraform Labs. Terraform Labs, known for the algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD and its sister cryptocurrency Luna, filed for bankruptcy protection in the wake of the infamous collapse of both in May 2022. The SEC's case stems from that $40 billion collapse of TerraUSD and a previous version of Luna, accusing Terraform Labs and Kwon of misleading investors about the stability of TerraUSD. Kwon was arrested in March of last year in Montenegro for using false documents. He is currently detained in Montenegro, following his attempt to travel to Dubai with a fake Costa Rican passport. The Terraform founder is currently awaiting extradition to either the United States or South Korea. Both Do Kwon and Terraform Labs deny committing fraud, with the SEC trial scheduled to commence in New York in late March.   

The Busan Port Authority (BPA) recently announced its plan to deploy a blockchain-based transshipment monitoring system known as Port-i at the port of Busan, located in the southern part of South Korea, according to local news outlet Financial News. The Port-i system is designed to streamline the management of transshipment cargo for shipping companies at Busan Port, which handles about 12.4 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) annually. The system is set for a pilot phase in January 2025, with plans to expand it to all shipping companies using the port by the second half of 2025.Photo by Christopher Lee on UnsplashEnhancing efficiency and profitability in shippingWith Port-i, shipping companies will be able to track ships and cargo through the Chain Portal, Busan Port’s integrated logistics platform. Port-i will provide a unified view of berth schedules across all terminals at the port, addressing the current issue where companies have to separately check ship and cargo statuses and independently identify berth schedules at different terminals. The BPA expects that the Port-i service will allow shipping companies to manage transshipment cargo more efficiently, improve ship loading rates and potentially increase profits. Blockchain for coffee quality controlIn addition to the Port-i initiative, Busan is also exploring other uses of blockchain technology for industrial development. The city recently set up the Busan Coffee R&D Lab, backed by the Ministry of Science and ICT, as reported by Metro.  This facility aims to use blockchain to create a platform that enhances the logistics of coffee sourcing and production, including a system that assigns unique identification to coffee products. It will provide reliable data required to control taste and quality. By integrating blockchain with artificial intelligence and advanced logistics techniques, Busan is positioning itself at the forefront of the coffee industry with innovative business models. 

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the city-state’s central bank and primary financial regulator, has set a deadline of June 30 for unlicensed digital token service providers (DTSPs) working out of Singapore to cease offering their services to clients in overseas markets.Photo by Hu Chen on UnsplashResponding to feedbackThe deadline emerged by way of a process MAS has followed as part of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022 (FSM Act). Last October, the regulator invited feedback from stakeholders related to the authority’s approach to the regulation of DTSPs. MAS published its response to that feedback on May 30.  It stated:”DTSPs which are subject to a licensing requirement under section 137 of the FSM Act must suspend or cease carrying on a business of providing DT services outside Singapore by 30 June 2025.” It added that it was not including any transitional arrangement for DTSPs despite MAS receiving such a suggestion from a number of feedback respondents. Instead, unlicensed DTSPs will need to abide by the June 30 deadline and have acquired a license by then or cease unlicensed activity.The regulator defines DTSPs as individuals, partnerships or Singapore corporations operating from a place of business in Singapore, including those formed or incorporated in Singapore who offer digital token services outside Singapore. Those found in breach of the regulation could face up to three years in prison and fines of up to S$250,000 ($195,000). Companies who have already obtained licensing or those exempted by way of the Securities and Futures Act, Payment Services Act and the Financial Advisers Act are free to continue trading. Challenging licensing requirementsThose who wish to become compliant will have to satisfy some challenging requirements. For those granted a license, an annual license fee of S$10,000 ($7,780) applies. Small-scale DTSPs need to satisfy a $150,000 ($116,670) ongoing capital requirement, while larger, well-established DTSPs must comply with a S$250,000 ($195,000) capital requirement. Additionally, MAS has put in place competency requirements related to a DTSP's CEO, directors, partners and managers. Hagen Rooke, a partner at law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, outlined on LinkedIn that while it's possible for unlicensed operators to obtain licensing, it will be very difficult to get a license. In its feedback response document, the regulator stated: “MAS will approach the licensing of DTSPs in a prudent and cautious manner and there will be extremely limited circumstances under which MAS will consider granting an applicant a licence under section 138 of the FSM Act.” Rooke advised crypto companies that may be affected to act swiftly in order to derisk through an operational restructuring or removing the businesses' Singapore touchpoints. He suggested that firms need to consider if it has customers outside of Singapore or front-office functions located outside of the city-state to determine if they could be affected by this regulatory measure. A number of Asian countries have moved to take action against unlicensed foreign firms that have engaged with local investors, with Thailand becoming the latest country to do so recently. However, the Singaporean authorities have approached the issue from the opposite perspective, citing the potential reputational risk that unlicensed DTSPs pose for Singapore.