Kaspersky Says Crypto Phishing on the Rise in the Philippines

Korean Financial Regulator to Inspect Non-Fiat Crypto Trading PlatformThe Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) plans to launch a comprehensive inspection on crypto trading platform Fobl (previously known as Foblgate) from March 11.©Pexels/김 대정Unlike other major Korean crypto exchanges, such as Upbit or Bithumb, which allow trading between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies, Fobl only offers trading between cryptocurrencies.Inspection on non-fiat exchangesThe FIU’s inspection of Fobl is a follow-up to the regulator’s inspection of GDAC, another Korean non-fiat crypto exchange. This suggests that the FIU will focus on inspecting non-fiat exchanges in the first half of this year.Many in the cryptocurrency industry have been paying attention to the FIU’s move after its first inspection of GDAC, as it could signal the direction in which the regulator would take. Earlier this year, the FIU announced that it would conduct inspections not only on non-fiat crypto exchanges but also on wallet solutions, custodians, and staking service providers. It is known that the FIU has been reviewing anti-money laundering (AML) systems and asset management statuses of these crypto enterprises.Fobl’s possible addition of fiat tradingThe Korean crypto industry suspects Fobl might transform itself into a fiat crypto exchange, considering the FIU’s notice that it will prioritize examining non-fiat exchanges that are preparing to support fiat trading.Fobl CEO’s take on the marketPrior to this news, Fobl CEO Ahn Hyun-joon said in a recent interview with Etnews that the platform is in talks with multiple banks to acquire real-name bank accounts and is complying with all the regulations required by the authorities. During the interview, he also raised concerns about the uncertainty that faces non-fiat crypto trading platforms, pointing out that 97% of the crypto trading in Korea is being carried out in crypto exchanges that support trading of Korean won.In Korea, the financial regulator requires virtual asset service providers (VASPs) offering trading in Korean won to hold real-name registered accounts at domestic banks as a measure to prevent money laundering.

India is strategically navigating the development of its digital rupee, with the Reserve Bank (RBI) actively addressing privacy concerns through technological solutions in its central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot programs. According to a recent report by CoinDesk, a senior official with insights into these initiatives revealed that while progress is evident, the RBI is proactively exploring ways to ensure privacy in the use of the digital rupee.Photo by Julian Yu on UnsplashPursuing mechanisms to maintain anonymityThe RBI has introduced a new dimension to the discourse on privacy concerns associated with CBDC usage. The central bank official suggested that the RBI may seek legal backing from India’s finance ministry to enact legislation allowing customers to delete transactions for the purpose of maintaining anonymity. New-found urgencyPublic statements from the RBI suggested a lack of urgency in implementing a full-scale retail CBDC, coupled with a reluctance to provide a specific timeline. However, recent events indicate that an underlying sense of urgency may be emerging. In the past month, the retail CBDC achieved a notable milestone, processing one million transactions in a single day, with support from various banks. Several banks, including HDFC Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Axis Bank, Canara Bank, IDFC First Bank and Union Bank of India, reportedly encouraged their employees to deposit funds in CBDC instead of fiat currency, contributing to this achievement. The official overseeing the CBDC development emphasized the necessity for experimentation and substantial efforts to ensure the security of the digital currency. While the settlement aspect is considered straightforward, addressing latency remains a priority for the RBI. No mandate on taxThe RBI, historically known for its opposition to crypto both domestically and globally, clarified that crypto taxation is not within its mandate. This clarification suggests that the RBI might not object if the Indian government decides to reduce the stringent taxes currently imposed on cryptocurrencies. The central bank clarified that it lacks the mandate to express a viewpoint on reducing a contentious tax that has stirred debate within the crypto industry. The RBI has been a driving force behind the adoption of wholesale and retail CBDC since late 2022 when it initiated pilot programs. The official emphasized that taxation matters fall under the government’s purview, reinforcing the RBI’s focus on its designated responsibilities. Similarly, the country’s judiciary recently turned down a plea to have it formulate a crypto regulatory framework, outlining that this too is up to the government to address. The central bank has a historical context of attempting to ban cryptocurrencies, with effective prohibitions in place between 2018 and 2020 until a Supreme Court order overturned the ban. Since then, the RBI has consistently expressed concerns about cryptocurrencies in various forums, including the Group of 20, where India played a leading role in coordinating global regulation in the crypto space. Recent utterances from the RBI governor, Shaktikanta Das, suggest that the regulator is disinterested in seeing the offering of spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in India despite that eventuality coming to pass last month in the United States. Das also spoke positively recently about the tokenization of real-world assets using blockchain technology.

Busan Hosts Blockchain Conference with Aim to Become Digital Financial HubBusan Metropolitan City hosted a blockchain conference on Monday as part of its aim to establish itself as a leading digital financial hub, according to Korean news agency News1.©Pexels/BERK OZDEMIRDot-com bubble comparisonDuring the conference, Kim Sang-min, chairman of the Busan Digital Asset Exchange Establishment Committee, highlighted the distortion in the blockchain landscape caused by unfair trading due to market monopolies and subsequent regulatory challenges. He compared the current situation to the dot-com bubble, stating that despite past issues, Korea has become a technological powerhouse. Kim suggested that while there may be challenges in the crypto exchange industry, excessive regulation should be avoided to promote growth.Kang Dae-goo, CEO of crypto exchange Borabit, agreed that many industries face initial growing pains, and the crypto industry is no exception. He urged Korea to join the race with financially-advanced countries promoting cryptocurrency in order to thrive in the digital age.Busan as digital financial centerExperts at the event identified Busan as the city with the greatest potential to become the nation’s premier digital financial center. Kim noted that Busan, which has been designated as a zone with lenient blockchain regulations, houses financial institutions with assets totaling 261 trillion won (~$195 billion) as of 2021. The city also hosts various international events for games and movies, providing ample content to develop virtual asset ecosystems.Kim proposed the establishment of a digital asset exchange that focuses on investor protection, emphasizing decentralization, fairness, and integration. He called for addressing current monopolistic governance practices and resolving unfair practices within crypto exchanges, such as cryptocurrency listing evaluations.More efforts urgedAttendees at the conference suggested that the Busan government and regional banks should take the lead in building infrastructure to attract companies. Kang noted that even though Busan has been designated as a blockchain special zone for four years, 48% of the industry remain unaware of this. He encouraged Busan to step up its efforts, citing examples of other municipalities, such as Incheon, which are actively engaging in various blockchain projects.Kang stressed the importance of public bodies providing infrastructure and support to attract businesses, adding that a business-friendly environment with a proper screening scheme will facilitate self-correction within the blockchain market as problematic companies are gradually filtered out.