Celsius and BlockFi Filings Reveal Bhutan Crypto Investment

Experts Gather at KBW 2023 to Explore the Future of Blockchain and Web3Blockchain and Web3 experts from around the world gathered at the Shilla Hotel in Seoul on Tuesday and Wednesday to attend Impact, the main conference of Korea Blockchain Week (KBW) 2023. There, they shared insights on the challenges faced by the blockchain industry as well as future prospects, especially their anticipation for South Korea’s role in shaping the industry’s landscape.Photo by Terren Hurst on UnsplashCurrent challengesAmong these experts was Sid Powell, CEO and Co-founder of Maple Finance; Stephen Richardson, Managing Director of Financial Markets and Head of the Asia Pacific region at Fireblocks; and Kelvin Koh, Co-founder and CIO at Spartan Group, who discussed the opportunities presented by bridging traditional finance with decentralized finance (DeFi) during a panel session on Wednesday.They mentioned the recent trending decline in DeFi transactions among institutional investors, which can be attributed to the DeFi industry’s fragmented infrastructure that can be difficult to understand. In order to rekindle investor confidence and interest, the industry must consider the integration of infrastructure and highlight the advantages of DeFi such as low costs, transparency, and liquidity to showcase its potential for financial gain.In a fireside chat on the same day, Jeremy Allaire, Co-founder and CEO of global fintech company Circle, acknowledged yet another mounting challenge facing the industry — the mass adoption of blockchain technology and Web3. However, the solution to this roadblock is not far out of reach, he said. Allaire predicted that by 2025, most cryptocurrencies, including stablecoins — cryptocurrencies that are pegged to a commodity or fiat currency to maintain a stable price — will have a legal foundation, thus paving the way for mass adoption.Suk Hwan Paul Kim, CEO and Vice Chairman of Grip Labs, and Archie Ravishankar, CEO of Cogni, also said that implementing user-friendly services and institutional entry will be a key strategy for persuading Web2 users to transition to Web3 platforms and encouraging mass adoption.Outlook for KoreaMeanwhile, several key figures expressed positive hopes for the pivotal role that Korea will play in the development of the Web3 ecosystem. In particular, Polygon Labs co-founder Sandeep Nailwal and COO Michael Blank pointed out that Korean companies, especially those in the gaming industry, are open to applying Web3 technology to their business projects, thus accelerating next-generation innovation in various fields like gaming, social media, and entertainment. Indeed, Polygon Labs’ own Korean partner firms recognize that the future of the Internet will rely on blockchain technology.In order to build a solid Web3 ecosystem, they said, three core values are of utmost importance — privacy, transparency, and openness. Fostering an environment that users can trust while freely interacting with others is the key, and Polygon Labs has vowed to contribute to doing so.Notably, Commissioner Caroline D. Pham of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) was also in attendance, where she shared her thoughts on the proper regulation of virtual assets. She stated that it is essential to apply the safety measures we have learned from the past century of financial history to the future cryptocurrency industry, cautioning against a one-sided view that virtual assets are inherently bad.In drawing a comparison between the US and Korea, she stated that although the US possesses strong technical capabilities and is gradually adopting a more positive perspective on virtual assets, Korea is still ahead by a decade due to the fact that the general public is more open to embracing emerging technologies. Therefore, the future partnership between the US and Korea could offer valuable insights, not only in terms of economic prosperity but also in legal and regulatory aspects.

Non-Fiat Crypto Exchanges in Korea Urge Banks for Real-Name AccountsThe Virtual Asset Exchange Association (VXA) made an announcement today regarding its recent due diligence request sent to 12 South Korean banks, as reported by local news outlet Digital Today. These banks have not yet entered into contracts to provide real-name deposit and withdrawal accounts to cryptocurrency exchanges.VXA is a group comprised of representatives from ten non-fiat crypto trading platforms in the country. Among its members, eight exchanges–Aprobit, Probit, BTX, Foblgate, GDAC, Flata Exchange, Flybit, and High Block (previously known as Huobi Korea)–participated in the request.Photo by Eduardo Soares on UnsplashPartnerships with banksThe objective of the request is to urge the banks to consider establishing partnerships with competent non-fiat exchanges. The requesters argued that such collaborations would promote fair trading in the market and provide customers with more options. They highlighted the growing presence of the virtual asset trading sector in the capital market.Uneven crypto marketAn official from VXA emphasized the key role played by real-name bank account issuers in creating a healthy environment that addresses the existing monopoly in the Korean crypto market. According to a March report published by the Financial Services Commission, non-fiat crypto trading platforms accounted for only 3 percent of the total Korean crypto market capitalization during the second half of 2022. The remaining 97 percent was attributed to fiat-supporting crypto exchanges.The official further explained that allowing more exchanges to support the trading of the Korean won currency would contribute to shaping a free market while bolstering transparency and investor protection.Legal requirementsEarlier this month, VXA also sought fair due diligence from five Korean banks that have already formed partnerships with fiat-supporting crypto exchanges. In Korea, crypto trading platforms are required by law to obtain real-name accounts from banks in order to provide cash deposit and withdrawal services.

Singapore Judge Says Crypto Not MoneyIn recent years, legal processes in various jurisdictions worldwide have seen judges comment on whether cryptocurrency is actually money. The latest such determination has been made by Justice Vinodh Coomaraswamy who outlined in a Singapore court that while being a component of financial transactions, cryptocurrencies are not money.The consideration emerged in a recent court hearing at Singapore’s High Court in a case involving the Algorand Foundation and failed Singapore-based hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Justice Coomaraswamy’s comments arose due to a discussion in the midst of the court proceedings involving the Judge and counsel representing the Algorand Foundation.©Pexels/EKATERINA BOLOVTSOVASeashells as moneyIn setting out his rationale for the need for 3AC to be wound up, Daniel Chan, a lawyer for the WongPartnership law firm that was representing the Algorand Foundation in the proceedings, told the judge that despite foreign currencies not being recognized as legal tender in Singapore, or used broadly as a medium of exchange within the city state, those foreign currencies are recognized by Singapore law as money. Using that analogy Chan suggested that by implication, the same scenario should be considered where cryptocurrencies are concerned.The judge provided a counterpoint: “What if you had a [community] in the world that used seashells as its internal medium of exchange? Would the Singapore courts have to recognize that as money.” Chan claimed that the judge had used an extreme example although Coomaraswamy remained steadfast in his view, pointing out that seashells had indeed been used as a form of money in the distant past.Coomaraswamy proceeded to dismiss the Algorand Foundation’s winding up application. He acknowledged that the Foundation did have standing in bringing the application. However, as he determined that cryptocurrency couldn’t be classed as money, on that basis he dismissed the application. In conveying his decision, he stated: “The word indebtedness, in my view, must require a debt which is in fiat currency. Determining whether or not a particular intangible, such as cryptocurrency, is money would require a detailed examination of evidence which is not appropriate in the context of insolvency.”Legal tenderThus far, bitcoin has been recognized as legal tender in two countries — El Salvador and the Central African Republic. In 2020, a French court referred to the leading cryptocurrency as money, agreeing that Bitcoin loans can be recognized as customer loans in the same way as loans denominated in fiat currencies. Earlier that year, an Australian court recognized bitcoin as a legally legitimate form of investment. In the United States, a Federal court recognized bitcoin as “money” or “funds” in a prosecution taken against Silk Road website operator Ross Ulbricht.There have been many similar instances in courts globally where judges have had to grapple with the consideration of whether bitcoin and crypto more generally can be regarded as money. Similar to the difficulty authorities are having in regulating cryptocurrency, it’s an issue that in most cases lacks complete clarity and in which we can expect further discussions on, similar to this most recent consideration in the Singaporean high court.