Bitget invests in Morph layer 2 network

Singapore High Court Recognizes Cryptocurrency as Personal PropertyIn a significant ruling on July 25, Judge Philip Jeyaretnam of the High Court of Singapore declared that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and should be recognized as property.The judge’s decision came in response to a case brought by Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange Bybit against its former employee, Ho Kai Xin, who was accused of transferring approximately 4.2 million Tether (USDT) from the crypto exchange to her private accounts without authorization.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashNo fundamental differenceIn his ruling, Judge Jeyaretnam emphasized that there is no fundamental difference between cryptocurrencies, fiat money, or even physical objects like shells when it comes to their status as property. He argued that as long as these objects hold value and are based on mutual faith, they can be considered property. The judge’s verdict is seen as a crucial step in establishing the legal status of digital assets within the Singaporean jurisdiction.Addressing the argument that cryptocurrencies lack physical presence and therefore cannot be considered property, Judge Jeyaretnam drew an analogy, stating: “We identify what is going on as a particular digital token, somewhat like how we give a name to a river even though the water contained within its banks is constantly changing.” By equating cryptocurrencies to named entities, the judge made it clear that physical tangibility is not a prerequisite for something to be classified as property.Cryptocurrencies have valueFurthermore, the ruling challenges the perception that cryptocurrencies have no “real” value. Judge Jeyaretnam firmly refuted this notion, highlighting that the value of any asset, whether physical or digital, is ultimately determined by collective human belief and judgment.One critical classification made by the judge is grouping cryptocurrencies under the category of “things in action” within British common law. This categorization means that cryptocurrencies are considered a form of property, over which personal rights can be claimed and enforced through legal actions, rather than requiring physical possession.The judge’s decision also referenced the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) consultation paper, which proposes implementing segregation and custody requirements for digital payment tokens. By taking cues from the MAS’s stance on digital assets, the court emphasized the legality of holding cryptocurrencies on trust, as long as practical methods for identification and segregation are in place.Cues taken from existing lawSingapore’s legal framework for property also played a crucial role in the ruling. Judge Jeyaretnam pointed to Order 22 of Singapore’s Rules of Court 2021, which defines “movable property” to include various assets, such as cash, debts, bonds, shares, and cryptocurrency or other digital currency. This inclusion reinforces the recognition of cryptocurrencies as a valid form of property within Singaporean law.In April of this year, a Hong Kong court reached a similar conclusion, recognizing cryptocurrency as property. In the High Court of Justice in London the following month, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) were recognized as “private property.”Overall, Judge Jeyaretnam’s ruling represents a significant milestone in the legal recognition of cryptocurrencies in Singapore. By acknowledging cryptocurrencies as property, the court provides greater clarity and certainty for crypto users and investors while affirming the importance of embracing digital assets within the nation’s legal framework.

EOS Granted Whitelist Approval by Japanese RegulatorsThe open-source layer-1 blockchain platform EOS has secured whitelist approval from the Japan Virtual and Crypto Asset Exchange Association (JVCEA).The EOS Network Foundation, an entity established with a view towards supporting and safeguarding the development of the EOS blockchain network, announced the approval via a blog post published to its website on Wednesday.EOS raised eyebrows with a staggering $4 billion initial coin offering (ICO) back in 2018. This approval will likely act as a shot in the arm for the project, given the period of relative stagnation that has followed the ICO.Photo by Paul MARSAN on UnsplashEOS price respondsThe approval paves the way for EOS to be traded against the Japanese yen, potentially opening up new avenues for the cryptocurrency’s adoption and utilization. The endorsement has had an immediate impact on the EOS token’s value, driving its price up by 5.54% over the course of the past seven days in a surge of market activity.At the time of writing, the EOS token is trading at $0.622 with an accompanying market capitalization of $696 million. This positive market response underscores the significance of regulatory greenlights in the cryptocurrency sphere.Mid-September trading launchThe Japanese Financial Service Authority (FSA) will oversee the regulation of EOS trading on local Japanese crypto exchange BitTrade, a well-established platform in the Japanese crypto space. The anticipated commencement of EOS token trading on BitTrade is slated for mid-September.The EOS development team is coming out the better end of its interaction with regulators in this instance. However, that hasn’t always been the case. In 2019 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States fined technology company Block.one, which at that time was responsible for the EOS ICO. All things considered, the sanction was recognized by most in the crypto space as being very much on the lighter end.Fostering Web3 growthJapan’s crypto ecosystem has been actively seeking ways to integrate and foster the growth of the Web3 industry. Its regulators have been lauded more recently, given that Japanese customers of failed crypto platforms like FTX were protected from those failures due to regulatory rules that insisted upon crypto platforms ring-fencing and safeguarding user funds.There have also been several initiatives taken to collaborate with international regulators on developing regulatory standards relative to digital assets. Earlier this month, the Japanese Financial Accounting Standards Foundation (FASF) met with the Korea Accounting Institute (KAI) to work on establishing accounting standards for digital assets.Japan’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) is also participating in Singapore’s Project Guardian, an initiative driven by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to explore the potential of digital assets.Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s supportive stance on Web3, describing it recently as “the new form of capitalism,” further reinforces Japan’s ambitions to establish itself as a hub for cryptocurrency activities. This regulatory nod for EOS could potentially mark the beginning of a broader trend, attracting more projects and investments to the Japanese crypto sector.

China's highest judicial authorities, the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, have released a judicial interpretation that includes the use of virtual assets to transfer illicit funds as a recognized method of money laundering. This move aims to strengthen the legal basis for investigating and prosecuting cases linked to cryptocurrency and money laundering activities.Photo by Vidar Nordli-Mathisen on UnsplashClarifying the legal status of crypto transactionsThe new judicial interpretation classifies virtual asset trading as a potential channel for money laundering. It specifies that using virtual-asset transactions or financial-asset exchanges to transfer or convert the proceeds of crime falls under the act of “disguising or concealing the source and nature of criminal proceeds and their gains by other means” as outlined in the country’s criminal law. Liu Honglin, founder of the Shanghai-based Man Kun law firm, clarified in a social media post that the interpretation does not equate all cryptocurrency trading with money laundering. According to Liu, the directive is not intended to criminalize the possession or trading of cryptocurrencies domestically but to provide clear legal guidelines for prosecuting specific illegal activities linked to crypto transactions. Impact on crypto trading and enforcementShao Shiwei, a fintech lawyer based in Shanghai, suggested that this interpretation could pose challenges for stablecoin merchants and increase legal risks for those involved in receiving illicit funds through crypto trading. The interpretation is part of broader efforts to regulate the virtual asset space, following the comprehensive ban on crypto trading activities by the People’s Bank of China and other authorities in September 2021. Despite the ban, many investors have continued to find ways to engage in crypto trading, sometimes circumventing capital control measures. For example, in May, Chinese police dismantled an underground bank that utilized the USDT stablecoin for foreign currency exchanges involving over 13.8 billion yuan ($1.9 billion). This incident underscores the ongoing challenges in enforcing existing regulations against the backdrop of innovative methods to bypass legal restrictions.