EOS Granted Whitelist Approval by Japanese Regulators

HTX experiences $258 million outflow post-hackHTX, the digital-asset trading platform associated with Chinese-born crypto mogul Justin Sun, has witnessed a substantial net outflow of $258 million since resuming operations after a significant security breach.According to Bloomberg, data from DefiLlama indicates that the outflow occurred between the exchange’s restart on Nov. 25 and Dec. 10, signaling unease among some clients following last month’s cyberattack. In November, HTX reported a loss of $30 million in crypto tokens due to the breach, prompting a temporary suspension of withdrawals and deposits.Towards the end of last month, the platform re-enabled withdrawal services for major cryptocurrencies, gradually bringing the exchange back to full service, supporting withdrawal of all digital assets.Photo by Amritanshu Sikdar on UnsplashMultiple hacksJustin Sun is also associated with the Poloniex exchange and the HECO Bridge, a network established by HTX for blockchain transfers. Both Poloniex and HECO fell victim to hacks in November, resulting in the theft of approximately $200 million in crypto. It’s worth noting that hackers had previously stolen $8 million from the HTX platform in September.HTX, which was formerly known as Huobi up until a business rebrand in September, boasts an average trading volume of $1.5 billion in the past 24 hours, securing its position as the fifteenth largest exchange when measured in terms of trading volume.Increased vigilanceIn the wake of several high-profile crypto platform failures in 2022, digital-asset investors are increasingly vigilant about monitoring flows and reserves at virtual currency exchanges. In particular, that trend gained momentum after the FTX platform’s collapse last year due to fraud.November turned out to be the most damaging month this year so far in terms of platform digital asset theft. Exit scams and exploits encountered during the month totaled a staggering $363 million in losses.In October, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) included HTX, alongside KuCoin, on a warning list, due to their promotion of services in the UK, without having obtained the required regulatory approvals.A third of reserves in BitcoinDefiLlama data reveals that Bitcoin constitutes the largest portion of HTX’s reserves, accounting for approximately 33%. Tron’s TRX token, launched by Sun in 2017, represents around 32% of the reserves. HTX’s native exchange coin, HT, makes up 14%, followed by a Sun-backed token named stUSDT at 12%.In August, Travis Kling, Founder of Ikigai Asset Management, had this warning relative to Sun and HTX:”Justin Sun is a criminal. There’s a hole in Huobi, a hole in TUSD and a hole in Tron DeFi. Act accordingly.”TRX, at the center of U.S. fraud allegations against Sun, prompted a March lawsuit by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), accusing him and his firms of market manipulation to inflate the token’s trading activity. Sun dismissed the suit on the X social media platform back in March, stating that it “lacks merit.” On Sunday, Sun claimed that the Tron blockchain network which he founded had reached a new milestone of 200 million users.Despite security firm BlockSec reporting the recovery of the $8 million stolen in September, hackers still appear to control the $30 million taken last month. The ongoing situation raises concerns about the security measures and resilience of HTX in the face of persistent cyber threats.

PDAX gears up for trading surge amidst Binance market exitThe Philippine Digital Asset Exchange (PDAX), an order book exchange, is planning to take full advantage of Binance’s regulatory issues in the Philippines, with the expectation of an uptick in trading volume as a direct consequence.Photo by iSawRed on UnsplashMarket opportunityAccording to a Filipino English-language broadsheet publication, The Daily Tribune, PDAX CEO Nichel Gaba sees the exit of Binance, flagged by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an unauthorized exchange in the Philippines, as a pivotal moment for local virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to expand their market presence. Gaba envisions that the anticipated migration of traders from Binance could propel the country’s cryptocurrency trading volume to an estimated $6 billion by 2024.Data from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) demonstrates that there are currently 17 VASPs in the Philippines, with 10 operational and seven inactive. As one of the operational ones, PDAX is preparing for the expected growth in the local sector.The SEC in the Philippines has been actively working towards imposing a ban on Binance, citing various issues both locally and internationally. Gaba predicts that this development will prompt a substantial number of Filipino cryptocurrency traders to seek alternative, legitimate trading platforms. Gaba stated:“Now that Binance is being banned, there are a lot of users wondering where they can go and the best option for them is to go to a licensed exchange like PDAX. Our strategy as a company is to focus on being the best alternative.”Binance ban countdownAccording to local news outlet BitPinas, the head of the Philippines SEC, Kelvin Lee, clarified that Binance and any other unregistered exchange issued with an advisory have three months before they are banned from the country.Addressing the confusion surrounding the ban during a panel discussion on Wednesday, Lee stated that the ban would be in effect three months from the issuance date of Nov. 29. In that way, time has been allowed for feedback and potential extensions.While the original recommendation was for a shorter transition period, Lee extended it, considering the upcoming Christmas holiday, stating, “Not to make it hard for Filipino investors during that time.”Two additional exchanges bannedIn addition to Binance, Lee mentioned that OctaFX and MiTrade, along with other exchanges that have received advisories for unregistered operations, will also face bans after three months. The local SEC disclosed having a sizable list of unregistered exchanges that will gradually emerge.Responding to criticisms of the ban, given that some users find Binance to be “cheaper” than other registered exchanges, Lee emphasized the importance of compliance costs and consumer protection. He urged local investors to “invest in registered entities” among the 17 VASPs registered in the country that offer fiat-to-crypto services.The BSP-regulated VASPs are expected to process crypto assets worth approximately $3 billion by the end of the year. However, this estimate does not take into account unregulated transactions occurring outside of VASP channels.

Chinese Fentanyl Producers Taking Payment in CryptoA report produced by blockchain analytics and crypto compliance solutions firm Elliptic has found that most Chinese suppliers of fentanyl precursors are accepting payments for the illicit material in cryptocurrency.In a blog post published on its website on Tuesday, Elliptic claimed that 90 percent of the 90 China-based firms, from which its researchers received offers of fentanyl precursors, accepted cryptocurrency as a form of payment. The majority of fentanyl which is trafficked into the United States is manufactured using imported fentanyl precursors like the material that the Elliptic researchers were offered.Seventeen of the suppliers even offered to provide fentanyl itself. Others still offered to supply synthetic opioids, equally or more potent than fentanyl, which are currently legal to both produce and supply within China.Photo by Hal Gatewood on UnsplashTracking blockchain transactionsIn tracing back transactions relative to these illicit suppliers, the Elliptic researchers’ analysis demonstrated that the digital asset wallets used by the rogue suppliers have received thousands of payments. The research team has estimated the net worth of those transactions to total $27 million.It appears that a move towards crypto payments is trending with this group of suppliers as there has been a 450% increase year-on-year when it comes to payments for fentanyl precursor using crypto.The study highlighted activity related to Dutch national Alex Peijnenburg. An alleged fentanyl supplier, Peijnenburg, made an $85,000 payment in crypto to one of the ninety fentanyl precursor suppliers identified by Elliptic researchers. In November of last year, the Dutchman was sanctioned by US authorities relative to his activities.Global trade and distributionThe report stated: “During our correspondence, the suppliers showed no concerns about how the chemical would be used, with some explaining that it was their best-selling product and could be used to produce fentanyl.”It went on to state that “others pointedly mentioned that they had sold it to customers in Mexico.” Mexico is a significant location in the global drugs trade, given the activity of drug cartels within the country. One supplier offered an insight to researchers as to the preferences of their nefarious Mexican clients, stating: “They always use USDT or Bitcoin to pay. It is no problem.”While it looks like these nefarious Chinese companies are able to trade into and out of crypto assets, that should be a difficulty for them as China banned the offering of crypto trading services going back a number of years already. Furthermore, foreign digital asset exchanges are prohibited from servicing the needs of Chinese clients where crypto is concerned.Elliptic’s research team uncovered that the majority of the illicit drugs trade suppliers have been using workarounds in order to gain access to overseas digital asset exchanges. The suppliers have used intermediaries in order to convert crypto into Chinese yuan.The report concludes that this part of the international fentanyl trade can be dealt with and “disrupted by the services that act as gateways into and out of crypto assets.” On arriving at that conclusion, Elliptic has acted by notifying the digital asset exchanges that these suppliers are using. “[We] have flagged hundreds of crypto addresses in our tools as being linked to this activity,” the report states.Crypto had infamously been associated with illicit activity on the dark web in its earliest years. It has moved well beyond that although due to its decentralized nature, it’s difficult, if not impossible, to control who utilizes decentralized digital currency.