Unprecedented surge in trading volumes on HashKey exchange

Huobi Delists USDD Stablecoin PairsHuobi Global, the Seychelles-headquartered cryptocurrency exchange, has made the decision to delist ten trading pairs, primarily involving tokens used in transactions with the USDD stablecoin issued by the TRON DAO Reserve.That’s according to an announcement published to Huobi’s website on Monday. These tokens are supported by TRON founder Justin Sun, who also acts as an advisor to Huobi. The delisting, effective from June 29, will impact several tokens, including the Cardano blockchain token ADA, Solana’s SOL, ApeCoin’s native token APE, MATIC from Polygon, FIL from Filecoin, and ETC from Ethereum Classic.Photo by Napendra Singh on UnsplashUnregistered securitiesAll of these tokens were offered on the Houbi platform in pairs with USDD. Additionally, trading pairs involving ARPA, GAS, QTUM, and ZKS with Bitcoin will also be removed from the platform. Huobi stated that these changes are aimed at providing users with an improved trading experience.Originating from China, Huobi has played a significant role in spot and derivatives trading for digital assets. The decision to delist these tokens follows their classification as unregistered securities in recent lawsuits by the US Securities and Exchange Commission against Binance and Coinbase. Prior to Huobi, Robinhood and eToro had already removed some of these tokens from their platforms.Stablecoins are designed to maintain a stable value by pegging them to less volatile assets like the US dollar. They achieve this by holding equivalent reserves of cash and cash-equivalent assets as collateral. Stablecoins are widely used by traders for transferring funds between exchanges and as a hedge against price volatility. This makes them some of the most heavily-traded tokens in the crypto space.USDD stabilityUSDD, the stablecoin at the center of this delisting, currently ranks as the eighth largest stablecoin by market capitalization, with approximately $750 million. Huobi is the primary exchange for buying and trading USDD, according to CoinGecko, a crypto market data provider. USDD is backed by various digital assets such as Bitcoin, Ether, and TRX, and it is issued by the TRON DAO Reserve. The TRON DAO Reserve operates as a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), utilizing blockchain technology to automate voting and transaction processes.USDD is an algorithmic stablecoin, with the assets held in backing the coin over-collateralized to a level of 170%. Despite this, the stablecoin has had issues in maintaining its US dollar peg from time to time. The issue has been that the token is partly backed by the TRX token, the native token of the TRON ecosystem. If TRX backing is discounted, the stablecoin is only 49% backed.Reports indicate that Sun acquired a controlling stake in Huobi through a Hong Kong-based asset manager, reportedly paying around $1 billion in November. However, Sun hasn’t provided any details of any such ownership stake.Huobi’s decision to delist these trading pairs reflects the evolving regulatory landscape and the need for exchanges to ensure compliance with securities regulations. By removing tokens that have faced legal scrutiny, Huobi aims to maintain a robust and compliant trading environment for its users.

GameFi-Oriented MARBLEX Decides to Burn 670M MBX TokensMARBLEX, the blockchain subsidiary of South Korean gaming company Netmarble, is going to burn 670 million of its native token MBX on July 19, according to a press release. This move is part of MARBLEX’s plan to overhaul the MBX tokenomics, which was announced last month.This token burn event involves the elimination of 67% of the total distribution of 1 billion MBX tokens. The tokens earmarked for burning have no designated purpose.Photo by Cullan Smith on Unsplash99% support for burning tokensTo determine the fate of these tokens, MARBLEX conducted a voting process from July 4 to 10, allowing Marbleship NFT holders and MBX token holders to participate. The outcome of the vote revealed that 99% of the participants supported burning the tokens.In preparation for the token burn, MARBLEX plans to share information about the event on cryptocurrency data tracking websites CoinMarketCap and Xangle.Moving forward, MARBLEX intends to introduce an improved token burn policy in the second half of this year. The revision of its tokenomics will enhance the utility of the MBX token, contributing to the establishment of a sustainable and trustworthy ecosystem.MBX token usesAccording to CoinMarketCap, the MBX token is traded on centralized exchanges Bithumb, Huobi, Bybit, Gate.io, MEXC, and Indodax, as well as on the decentralized exchange KLAYswap. Token holders can use MBX to buy items in marketplaces, trade MBX for in-game tokens, and exchange MBX with other game players. Notable MBX games include A3: Still Alive, a battle royale MMORPG; Ni no Kuni: Cross Worlds, a fantasy MMORPG; The King of Fighters ARENA, a fighting game; and Meta World: My City, a Web3 property management game.

As cryptocurrencies increasingly position themselves as a recognized asset class and potential hedge against fiat inflation, illicit activity tied to digital tokens is becoming more visible. A recent high-profile case in the UK has brought this issue into sharp focus, centering on a fraud scheme originating in China. According to BBC News, the case involves Qian Zhimin, a woman who raised funds from more than 100,000 investors in China by claiming to operate a crypto mining company that also develops health products. Instead, she laundered the proceeds and fled the country. On Nov. 11, Qian was sentenced to 11 years and eight months in prison by a UK court.Photo by Vasilis Chatzopoulos on Unsplash$6B fraud and lavish lifestyle​Qian entered Britain on a forged passport in September 2017 and proceeded to live an extravagant lifestyle, renting a mansion in Hampstead for over £17,000 ($22,700) per month. She was arrested in northern England in April 2024, and it was found that she held roughly 61,000 Bitcoin, valued at roughly £5 billion ($6.6 billion), having converted portions of her holdings to cover her substantial living expenses. ​The sheer scale of her wealth was revealed after police searched her rented residence, discovering the Bitcoin reserves on hard drives and laptops. It marks the largest crypto seizure ever recorded in the UK. During the raid, officers also found four other individuals at the property illegally employed to handle household tasks such as shopping, cleaning, and security. ​Since Qian’s arrival in the UK, the value of her Bitcoin holdings has appreciated more than 20-fold. With the fraudster now sentenced, victims are seeing a glimmer of hope for restitution. A civil case scheduled for early next year will determine the fate of the seized assets. However, while many defrauded Chinese investors are reportedly preparing to file claims, establishing a clear paper trail may prove difficult. Many victims routed funds through local intermediaries rather than transferring them directly to Qian’s firm. ​U.S. Bitcoin forfeiture and Beijing’s allegationsWhile the UK courts grapple with the aftermath of Qian’s fraud, a separate crypto controversy is brewing between the U.S. and China, highlighting Beijing's continued vigilance over the sector despite its 2021 ban on trading and mining. According to Cointelegraph, the state-supported National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) has alleged that American authorities are connected to the disappearance of roughly 127,000 Bitcoin, valued at around $14.5 billion, from the LuBian mining pool. ​These allegations surfaced after the U.S. filed a civil forfeiture claim in October against Chen Zhi, the Cambodia-based founder of the Prince Group, who is believed to have owned the assets prior to the breach. At the time of the filing, the U.S. Treasury Department noted that the funds were already under its control. ​CVERC contends that Washington hasn't explained how it accessed the assets. Citing data from analytics firm Arkham, the Chinese agency suggested the funds had been under U.S. control for over a year. They argued that the prolonged inactivity of the Bitcoin before the formal seizure is inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers seeking quick profit, implying state-level involvement. Economic chess between Washington and BeijingThis matter of Bitcoin control adds a new layer of complexity to U.S.–China relations, even as a trade truce between the two countries took effect on Nov. 10. In a report by CNBC, Washington cut tariffs on China’s fentanyl-linked imports to 10% and extended a reciprocal rate reduction under that agreement. In exchange, Beijing is said to have eased certain restrictions on rare earth exports. Analysts at Morgan Stanley suggest that China is maintaining its export-control regime, implemented in April, to retain strategic leverage. They caution that recurring negotiations and strategic divergence will remain defining features of the evolving bilateral relationship.