Policy & Regulation·Dec 16, 2025
Korea to seek central bank input only for major stablecoins
South Korean lawmakers are moving to seize control of the nation’s stalled second phase of digital asset legislation, aiming to bypass months of interagency gridlock and introduce a comprehensive regulatory framework by January. The legislative acceleration comes as Seoul races to align with global standards following the implementation of the U.S. GENIUS Act in July, a shift that has intensified pressure on local regulators to formalize oversight of the crypto sector. According to a report from the Maeil Business Newspaper, the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce the Digital Asset Basic Act as a lawmaker-sponsored bill rather than wait for a government submission. The procedural move is intended to ensure that formal deliberations can begin during the February provisional session. Lawmaker Kang Jun-hyeon, a DPK member of the National Policy Committee, told reporters on Dec. 11 that relying on the government’s timeline would jeopardize passage of the bill in the first half of next year. Kang cited points of disagreement among the parliament, the government, and industry stakeholders. Among the authorities, in particular, a standoff between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) over monetary policy and issuance authority has been a key source of delay.Photo by Lauren Seo on UnsplashDraft sets ‘major’ stablecoin requirementsAt the heart of the legislation is a new classification system for stablecoins. The government delivered its draft for the Digital Asset Basic Act to DPK’s Digital Asset Task Force, outlining its intention to classify won-denominated stablecoins exceeding a certain issuance threshold as “major digital payment tokens.” According to Blockmedia, citing sources familiar with the closed-door briefing to the task force, these assets would fall under a rigorous oversight framework developed in consultation with the central bank. Under the draft rules, issuers would be required to maintain 100% reserves, prohibited from making interest payments to holders, and obliged to submit detailed issuance plans to the FSC. Foreign-issued stablecoins would only be permitted to circulate domestically if the issuer establishes a local branch. Although the government ultimately submitted its draft to the DPK, the delivery was delayed by two days, missing the Dec. 10 deadline set by the party. Officials attributed the postponement to unresolved interagency disagreements. The central bank had argued that any issuance should require unanimous approval from all relevant agencies, including itself, but the government agreed to involve the bank only when a token is designated as “major.” The Bank of Korea continues to advocate for a bank-led consortium issuance model, highlighting the coordination challenges that have complicated the bill’s preparation. Supply thresholds emerge as fault lineCritics warn that the proposed regulations could inadvertently tilt the market against domestic innovation. Analysts argue that if the threshold for the "major" designation is set too low, new won-based issuers may face compliance costs that could undermine their business viability before they reach meaningful scale. They added that setting the bar for entrenched dollar-backed issuers such as USDT and USDC is also complex, given that their combined global issuance already exceeds $250 billion. Market participants said concerns about triggering the “major” designation could prompt Korean issuers to cap supply to avoid heightened scrutiny, effectively stifling growth from the outset. Despite these concerns, political will to close the policy vacuum is hardening. The DPK intends to move the legislation forward on its own timetable, incorporating the government’s input but steering the process through parliament. Lawmaker Kang emphasized that while numerous issues remain, the task force aims to narrow the debate to a few essential questions before the bill’s planned introduction in January. Industry representatives have largely welcomed the clearer timeline, viewing the move as a necessary step to reduce uncertainty as the global crypto sector comes under more formal regulatory oversight.
