Wemade joins hands with Dubai Chambers to expand Web3 and gaming endeavors in Middle East

Hong Kong’s GSBN Takes Lead in Blockchain LogisticsIn recent years, the logistics industry has seen an increase in the use of blockchain technology to streamline supply chains and provide greater transparency to customers. While some major players, like Danish firm Maersk, have terminated their blockchain-based platforms, others are bullish on the long-term potential of the technology.©Pexels/Ben CheungA blockchain-based shipping platformOne such player is the Hong Kong-based Global Shipping Business Network (GSBN), a nonprofit consortium focused on blockchain trade applications. According to a report by the South China Morning Post, GSBN operates one of the world’s largest platforms as an alternative to Maersk’s TradeLens tool. Since launching its blockchain-based shipping platform in 2021, GSBN has partnered with major shipping companies and terminal operators such as Cosco, Orient Overseas Container Line, Hapag-Lloyd, Hutchison Ports, SPG Qingdao Port, PSA International, Shanghai International Port Group, and Cosco Shipping Ports.The platform, based on a permissioned blockchain with strong data governance, allows only authorized parties to contribute and consume shipping-related data. The organization believes that blockchain is a crucial logistics tool in the long term, and its adoption may take another decade.Blockchain inevitable amid continued digitizationGSBN CEO Bertrand Chen is confident in the potential of blockchain technology, saying that global trade will not continue to rely on “pen and paper” by 2032. He believes that blockchain has the potential to help the industry transform in response to supply issues triggered by events such as COVID-19.“Because of COVID-19, because you have to change the process, I think this is one of the regular use cases of blockchain” . . . “Probably that’s better than NFTs of digital art. NFTs of documents for global trade — this will be the real killer use case.”While Chen acknowledges that China has taken the lead in blockchain logistics due to its significant investment in the industry, he believes that GSBN has global ambitions and is working to attract more European shipping lines. The nonprofit even hopes to onboard Maersk one day, but Chen admits that such a scenario “may be slightly challenging.”Emerging Web3 hubHong Kong has also emerged as a major hub for Web3 and cryptocurrency, with the local government taking action to adopt clear industry regulations. Despite a blanket ban on crypto in China, some Chinese government-related firms have reportedly been growing interested in crypto investment, with state-owned firms like insurer CPIC launching crypto-related funds in early April.Blockchain technology has the potential to revolutionize global trade and supply chain management, providing greater transparency and efficiency. However, widespread adoption may still be years away, and companies will need to navigate regulatory and technical challenges to fully leverage the benefits of blockchain.While some logistics firms may have terminated their blockchain-based projects, others like GSBN remain optimistic about the potential of blockchain technology in global trade. With major shipping partners and terminal operators already onboard, GSBN has a solid foundation to build on as it continues to attract more players to its platform. As the world becomes increasingly digitized, blockchain may be a crucial tool for the logistics industry to transform and adapt to new challenges.

Singaporean Researchers Devise More Effective DAO VotingResearchers at the Singapore University of Social Sciences have come up with a more efficient governance model for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashDAO governance reviewThe scientists presented their work via a paper titled “Voting Schemes in DAO Governance,” which was published earlier this week. The paper is due to appear in the Annual Review of Fintech in due course.The research paper initially sets out with a review of the different forms of voting currently used to affect DAO governance in the various early stage projects that are already up and running. Having taken a deep dive into existing approaches, the research team of Qinxu Ding, Weibiao Xu, Zhiguo Wang and David Kuo Chuen Lee decided that they could go one better themselves.Their review encompassed eight current approaches including the following: token-based quorum voting, knowledge-extractable voting, conviction voting and reputation-based voting. Each voting scheme was then evaluated based on the following factors:Efficiency: An assessment of the speed at which proposals are selected and approved.Fairness: Each voter should have equal rights to vote.Scalability: The degree to which storage, computation and communication needs can be adjusted relative to the number of voters.Robustness: An assessment of the relative resistance of the voting scheme to attacks and collusion.Incentive Schemes: The extent to which DAO members are motivated to vote.Following on from that analysis, the scientists put forward a hypothetical voting mechanism with design considerations relative to fully decentralized and permissionless DAO governance. When it came to ratings, the holographic consensus approach scored highest, with a “high” rating in the categories of efficiency, fairness and robustness, dropping down to medium when it came to scalability. None of the other approaches came close.In trying to go one better, the team took the holographic consensus approach and set out to create their own hypothetical voting mechanism based on this model. As evidenced from the paper, they tried to effect improvements to this approach:“We know that the downside of the conviction voting mechanism is that it takes time to approve an urgent proposal. To address this concern, we introduce a blind betting mechanism: each member could choose whether to bet on any proposals with a certain number of their tokens.”The researcher’s hypothetical model allows stakeholders to gamble their tokens on the likelihood of a proposal passing or failing. The logic with this approach, they claim, is that it would speed up the governance process, while making it more robust at the same time.In concluding remarks, the researchers acknowledged that all approaches were not without their pros and cons. They point out that the further development of DAOs shouldn’t be confined to a static organizational future. While they believe that their own hypothetical scheme is in theory superior, they acknowledge that it too has flaws. With that, the realities of implementing it in the real world may be a challenge.

Monthly Active Users of Binance in South Korea Surpasses 230,000The monthly active user (MAU) count for the virtual asset exchange app Binance has surpassed 230,000 in South Korea, according to a recent analysis reported by local news outlet Etoday. This places Binance as the fourth-largest exchange in terms of user base, following more prominent local won-denominated exchanges Upbit, Bithumb, and Coinone.Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashSoaring numbersAccording to data from the insights platform Mobile Index, the MAU for the Binance app in Korea averaged 230,965 users from February to July this year. Starting from 238,487 users in February, the number peaked at 240,000 in April, followed by a slight decrease to 219,010 in June and 215,743 in July. These figures significantly outpace the 131,799 average for Korbit and 36,123 for Gopax, recorded over the past six months.The abundance of users is also reflected in the app’s high trading volume in Korea. In May this year, Binance reportedly accounted for around $58.3 billion in trading volume from Korean users, representing approximately 13% of the total trading volume, according to the Wall Street Journal. This makes Korea the app’s second-largest market after China in terms of trading volume.These statistics are notable considering the fact that Binance does not support won-denominated trading nor has a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license for Korean operations. They can thus be attributed to the availability of futures trading, which is not offered by local exchanges. According to the Journal, futures trading accounts for 98% of the transactions conducted by Korean users.Regulatory validationMoreover, Binance is registered on the travel rule whitelists of three of the country’s largest exchanges: Upbit, Bithumb, and Coinone. This travel rule regulation was put into effect last year, requiring financial institutions to share data on cryptocurrency transactions.Being whitelisted means that users of the aforementioned exchanges can easily make trades on Binance after completing Know Your Customer (KYC) identification procedures.Each exchange follows its own criteria to add virtual asset service providers to its whitelist, allowing only whitelisted entities to send and receive transactions.Industry experts claim that this is yet another depiction of just how lucrative Korea’s crypto market is, as is the case with the significant trading volumes recorded by domestic exchanges. This is likely driving the active efforts of foreign exchanges, including Binance, to penetrate the market.Binance’s ongoing regulatory challengesEarlier this year, Binance acquired a majority stake in Streami, the operator of Korea’s KRW-to-crypto exchange Gopax, aiming to solidify its presence in the Korean market. Following this acquisition, Streami underwent leadership transitions that saw Lee Joon-haeng step down, making way for Binance’s APAC head Leon Sing Foong. Subsequently, the leadership baton was passed to Lee Joong-hoon, the former Vice President of Gopax.For these shifts in leadership, Streami submitted reports to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) to inform the regulatory body about changes in company representatives. However, despite these notifications, the financial regulator has not yet granted its approval, likely influenced by the ongoing legal challenges Binance is facing in multiple jurisdictions, including that of the United States.In a seeming effort to address this regulatory impasse, Streami has recently decided to undergo yet another change in its CEO position. This marks the third leadership alteration within a span of six months. Meanwhile, the identity of the incoming CEO is yet to be disclosed.Oscillating trends of growth and declineIn related news, Mobile Index also reported that Upbit had the highest MAU among virtual asset exchange apps in Korea. From February to July, Upbit averaged an MAU count of 3,280,746, surpassing the 1,005,432 average for Bithumb, marking a threefold difference. Coinone’s average MAU during this period was calculated at 316,277.However, over the same six-month period, all won-denominated exchanges except for Korbit experienced a decline in MAU. Gopax witnessed a 22.3% drop from 42,556 users in February to 33,059 users in July. This was followed by 20%, 14.8%, and 6.8% declines for Coinone, Bithumb, and Upbit, respectively. Binance also experienced a 9.5% dip.In contrast, Korbit saw a 16.5% increase, rising from 118,816 MAU in February to 131,799 in July.