BingX embarks on rebrand to further service offering

Chinese Nationals Detained in Crypto Mining Clampdown in LibyaAuthorities in Libya have detained 50 Chinese nationals suspected of involvement in an illicit crypto mining operation in Zliten, a city located 160 kilometers east of the Libyan capital of Tripoli.The attorney general’s office in Libya made the announcement on Friday, revealing that the individuals were caught operating a cryptocurrency mining farm within an abandoned iron factory.Photo by Dmitry Demidko on UnsplashMining operation dismantledPhotos and videos released by the office of Attorney General Siddiq Al-Sour showcased the dismantling process of the extensive mining systems discovered in Zliten.This is not the first instance of Chinese miners being detained for crypto mining activities in the North African country. The development follows the recent arrest of ten other Chinese nationals in the city of Misrata on the Mediterranean coast, as well as at two sites within the capital, Tripoli. The individuals were apprehended on Wednesday while being caught “red-handed” with numerous powerful equipment used for intricate proof of work (PoW) mining calculations. The mining rigs were subsequently confiscated by the attorney general’s office.Mining banDespite the official ban on cryptocurrency mining in the country, Libya has witnessed a high prevalence of such activities, with the nation recording the highest percentage of cryptocurrency mining across the African continent in 2021. It is estimated that Libya accounted for approximately 0.6 percent of global Bitcoin production during that year.Libya’s appeal as a destination for cryptocurrency mining stems from its low electricity costs, which stand at a remarkably low rate of $0.004 per kilowatt hour. This cost is approximately 40 times cheaper than in the United States, making Libya an attractive location for miners.While energy may be cheap, the increased demand for electricity that crypto mining brings puts a strain on what was an already vulnerable power grid in the country. That has resulted in frequent and lengthy power blackouts, particularly during the summer months.A lack of oversight has also encouraged an influx of Chinese miners, albeit with these recent arrests, it appears that the Libyan authorities are stepping up the level of oversight and enforcement. The vast majority of Bitcoin miners were based in China up until a mining ban was enforced in 2021.Global issueThat event led to an exodus of miners internationally. Some established themselves legally in the United States and elsewhere. The first casualty of illegal mining was Kazakhstan. The sudden arrival of miners led to its power grid coming under pressure. As a consequence, the Central Asian country clamped down on the activity, and later regulated it.In response to these illegal activities, Libyan authorities have intensified their efforts to combat cryptocurrency mining operations. They are conducting investigations into alleged mining sites in Tripoli and Misrata, aiming to curtail these activities and mitigate the strain on the country’s electricity infrastructure.The recent arrests highlight the ongoing challenges associated with illegal mining activities in jurisdictions globally where cheap energy can be exploited, giving rise to the need for enhanced regulatory measures to address these issues.

MaskEX Gets Initial Regulatory Approval in UAEThe online cryptocurrency trading platform and wallet provider, MaskEX has been given initial regulatory approval by a regulator in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).Photo by Carlos Alberto Gómez Iñiguez on UnsplashThe trading platform received outline approval from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) in Dubai, where the company is headquartered. While the business has been around since 2021, this first compliance step is significant as it seeks to build and extend its footprint within the UAE and the broader Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.Regulatory significanceTo say that regulation has lagged the development of crypto assets on a global basis is an understatement. However, the high profile and spectacular crypto business failures in 2022 have really captured the attention of regulators and lawmakers. Many point to inadequate regulation as a key cause of those failures. With that, most regulators recognize that it won’t be acceptable to the broader public to have such a loss impact on ordinary investors in a rerun of the collapses of 2022.VARA has been one of the most proactive regulators in that respect. The Authority has developed a regulatory framework, culminating in its current licensing regimen for crypto businesses. It wouldn’t have been feasible for MaskEX to trade without obtaining regulatory approval.Regulatory actionIn February, VARA issued Open Exchange (OPNX), a platform that specializes in the trading of crypto bankruptcy claims, with a cease and desist order, relative to the establishment of that business in Dubai. Last month, the Regulatory Authority issued an investor alert related to OPNX, warning the investing public that OPNX was not regulated by them and that investing in or using the platform was risky.That culminated with VARA sending OPNXs founders and CEO a formal warning letter. With that sort of action playing out, it’s no surprise that MaskEX has tried to go the compliant route, acquiring that initial approval.The firm is not alone in taking that approach. On May 1, BitOasis, another crypto trading platform headquartered in Dubai, became the first entity to be awarded a broker-dealer license.This milestone event for MaskEX means that it can now complete entity formation, expand its team, secure banking services and generally, open for business. In its application MaskEX requested permission to engage in the activity of acting as an exchange, offer borrowing and lending services, as well as to act as a broker and crypto asset manager.Crypto market to be driven by ME and Central AsiaOn social media on Thursday, MaskEXs VP and Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) Ben Caselin, said that the initial approval forms part of the firm’s application for a Full Market Product (FMP) license. Caselin used the opportunity to post a video offering a sneak peek at the firm’s new Dubai offices. “MaskEX will be the first crypto exchange to publicly disclose their headquarters and even allow the general public to visit,” he said.Speaking at Finoverse Arabia this week, Caselin also said that “the next crypto bull market is once again going to be driven by Asia, and the unsurprising surprise will come from the Middle East and Central Asia.” That’s a prediction that’s being floated by quite a number of industry commentators, and with the US shooting itself in the foot in its approach to digital assets, it sounds like a reasonable prediction.

Conflict Identified as Crypto.com Trading on its Own PlatformTrading practices at Crypto.com, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange, have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest within the digital assets industry.Citing a number of unnamed sources, the Financial Times (FT) made the claim in a report published on Monday.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsConflict of interestIn traditional financial markets, exchanges typically match buyers with sellers at competitive transparent prices, while market making and proprietary trading are conducted by separate private companies. However, US regulators have recently cracked down on similar activities at digital asset exchanges. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, faced 13 charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including allegations of manipulative trading to inflate trading volume.The presence of internal traders at Crypto.com has not been widely known since the company’s launch in 2016. The FT’s sources claim that Crypto.com executives provided sworn statements to external trading houses denying the company’s involvement in trading activities.Employees were allegedly instructed to deny the existence of an internal market-making operation. In response to inquiries, Crypto.com denied that employees were asked to lie, stating that their internal market maker functioned similarly to third-party market makers, ensuring tight spreads and efficient markets on their platform.The majority of Crypto.com’s revenue reportedly comes from its app for retail traders, where the company acts as the counterparty for transactions and operates as a broker model. The company’s trading team hedges these positions on various venues, including their own exchange, to maintain risk neutrality. Crypto.com emphasized that their exchange provides a level playing field for institutional traders.According to insiders, Crypto.com’s proprietary trading desk engages in trading activities on the company’s exchange and other platforms, solely focused on generating profits rather than facilitating an exchange. The market making desk, on the other hand, aims to enhance liquidity on the platform.Not a revenue sourceCrypto.com defended its practices by stating that comparing trading volumes to competitors is common in the industry. It said that the company’s priority is to continuously improve order book liquidity and reduce spreads, benefiting all participants. The firm told Decrypt that trading is not a source of revenue: “While we do have some market making activity, for example, we have internal market makers for our CFTC-regulated product Up/Downs in the United States.”As a private company, Crypto.com publishes accounts in different countries, but revenue breakdown by business line is not disclosed.Closure of institutional tradingFollowing the SEC’s enforcement actions, earlier this month Crypto.com announced the closure of its exchange for institutional US traders due to limited demand in the current market landscape, effective from June 21.In any marketplace transparency and fairness are crucial. It’s fair to say that there has been some level of sharp practice among some actors in the marketplace while regulators have been lacking in getting up to speed with the emergent sector, and moving to protect consumers. With the major crypto platform failures of 2022 has come renewed interest in resolving these issues. That may make for some short-term difficulty, but in the longer term, it should mean greater protections for market participants so long as a common sense approach is pursued.