Top

Conflict Identified as Crypto.com Trading on its Own Platform

Web3 & Enterprise·June 20, 2023, 12:21 AM

Trading practices at Crypto.com, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange, have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest within the digital assets industry.

Citing a number of unnamed sources, the Financial Times (FT) made the claim in a report published on Monday.

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels

 

Conflict of interest

In traditional financial markets, exchanges typically match buyers with sellers at competitive transparent prices, while market making and proprietary trading are conducted by separate private companies. However, US regulators have recently cracked down on similar activities at digital asset exchanges. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, faced 13 charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including allegations of manipulative trading to inflate trading volume.

The presence of internal traders at Crypto.com has not been widely known since the company’s launch in 2016. The FT’s sources claim that Crypto.com executives provided sworn statements to external trading houses denying the company’s involvement in trading activities.

Employees were allegedly instructed to deny the existence of an internal market-making operation. In response to inquiries, Crypto.com denied that employees were asked to lie, stating that their internal market maker functioned similarly to third-party market makers, ensuring tight spreads and efficient markets on their platform.

The majority of Crypto.com’s revenue reportedly comes from its app for retail traders, where the company acts as the counterparty for transactions and operates as a broker model. The company’s trading team hedges these positions on various venues, including their own exchange, to maintain risk neutrality. Crypto.com emphasized that their exchange provides a level playing field for institutional traders.

According to insiders, Crypto.com’s proprietary trading desk engages in trading activities on the company’s exchange and other platforms, solely focused on generating profits rather than facilitating an exchange. The market making desk, on the other hand, aims to enhance liquidity on the platform.

 

Not a revenue source

Crypto.com defended its practices by stating that comparing trading volumes to competitors is common in the industry. It said that the company’s priority is to continuously improve order book liquidity and reduce spreads, benefiting all participants. The firm told Decrypt that trading is not a source of revenue: “While we do have some market making activity, for example, we have internal market makers for our CFTC-regulated product Up/Downs in the United States.”

As a private company, Crypto.com publishes accounts in different countries, but revenue breakdown by business line is not disclosed.

 

Closure of institutional trading

Following the SEC’s enforcement actions, earlier this month Crypto.com announced the closure of its exchange for institutional US traders due to limited demand in the current market landscape, effective from June 21.

In any marketplace transparency and fairness are crucial. It’s fair to say that there has been some level of sharp practice among some actors in the marketplace while regulators have been lacking in getting up to speed with the emergent sector, and moving to protect consumers. With the major crypto platform failures of 2022 has come renewed interest in resolving these issues. That may make for some short-term difficulty, but in the longer term, it should mean greater protections for market participants so long as a common sense approach is pursued.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Sep 02, 2023

HashKey’s New $100M Fund to Prioritize Altcoins

HashKey’s New $100M Fund to Prioritize AltcoinsHashKey Capital, the investment arm of Hong Kong-based crypto firm HashKey Group, is embarking on a new investment journey with the launch of a fund that predominantly targets major altcoins.Photo by Kanchanara on Unsplash50% altcoin allocationIn a recent interview with Reuters, Jupiter Zheng, the Portfolio Manager of the fund, revealed that less than 50% of the fund’s allocation will be directed towards Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), the two largest cryptocurrencies.The fund has already garnered attention from potential clients, primarily high-net-worth individuals and investment firms catering to affluent, high-net-worth Asian families. Zheng underscored the fund’s commitment to diversifying investment strategies, which he believes is necessary as a consequence of the Hong Kong stock market’s recent weakness.“We see untapped demand from professional investors who wish to chase above-market returns in crypto,” Zheng noted, suggesting that the allure of crypto assets is becoming increasingly appealing to traditional investors.$1 billion assets under managementHashKey Capital has $1 billion in assets under management, and the firm has set an ambitious target of raising $100 million for the newly launched fund within the next 12 months. This allocation strategy also includes a portion of the fund’s holdings in cash, allowing for flexibility in navigating the dynamic and volatile cryptocurrency market.In addition to forging ahead with crypto investments, the company is actively establishing distribution channels with offshore Chinese financial institutions, expanding its reach and influence in the digital asset space.Positive market outlookZheng remains optimistic about the crypto market’s future, expressing confidence that cryptocurrency prices are finding stability as industry liquidity improves. He cited several factors contributing to this stabilization, including the plateauing of US interest rates and the growing interest of large US asset managers in filing for spot Bitcoin ETFs, indicating a maturing and evolving industry sector.Responding to news of the new fund, Ryan Selkis, CEO and Founder of crypto market intelligence firm Messari, said that he expected other funds to follow suit in 2024 given that “there’s a ton of inefficiency and mispricing in assets 50–500 by market cap.”HashKey’s progression in the crypto investment space can be traced back to its acquisition of a Type 9 asset management license from Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission last year. This license granted HashKey the ability to manage portfolios exclusively composed of virtual assets, laying the groundwork for its latest venture. It has since secured Type 1 and Type 7 licenses and recently started offering its products to retail investors in Hong Kong, being one of the first to do so.Funding roundEarlier in the year, the company successfully closed a $500 million investment round for a fund dedicated to infrastructure, tooling, and applications that drive the widespread adoption of blockchain and crypto technologies. In April, it launched a wealth management service in response to demand from investors who were looking to gain exposure to digital assets.Hong Kong’s welcoming stance towards cryptocurrencies and its proactive approach to addressing market demand for alternative assets have played a pivotal role in attracting digital asset firms. The city’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has been granting licenses to crypto exchanges in alignment with its new licensing framework, opening up opportunities for retail investors to trade “large-cap tokens” on licensed platforms while implementing safeguards like knowledge tests, risk profiles, and reasonable exposure limits.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Dec 08, 2023

Regulatory crackdown as Hong Kong authorities act against crypto entities

Regulatory crackdown as Hong Kong authorities act against crypto entitiesIn a recent move, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong has issued a public warning against suspected virtual asset-related frauds involving HongKongDAO and BitCuped, marking a significant crackdown on deceptive practices in the crypto space.The action taken by the SFC in conjunction with the Hong Kong Police Force was outlined in a notice published on Wednesday. The notice stated:“The SFC suspects HongKongDAO may be disseminating false and misleading information about itself and its business through online channels.”In relation to BitCuped, it stated: “The SFC notes that BitCuped claims on its website that ‘Laura Cha’ and ‘Nicolas Aguzin’ serve as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer respectively, when in fact none of them has any affiliations with BitCuped.”Photo by Teodor Kuduschiev on UnsplashHongKongDAO’s alleged misinformationOperating under the name “Hong Kong Digital Research Institute,” HongKongDAO has faced accusations of disseminating false and misleading information. The SFC expressed concerns about the claims made by HongKongDAO, including assertions of licensing by the SFC, engagement in regulated activities since July 2020, and bids for a “Hong Kong Digital Currency Exchange Licence” related to the government’s stablecoins framework.The SFC contends that these claims are unfounded and could potentially mislead the public into believing that HongKongDAO’s services are officially sanctioned and legitimate.HongKongDAO seems to manage at least two Telegram groups, one in Chinese with over 10,000 members and the other in English with over 1,700 members. Within these groups, there appears to be a promotion of the purported “market” price and future market value of the HKD token, enticing investors to make purchases.Allegations of BitCuped false affiliationsSimultaneously, BitCuped has been accused of making fraudulent claims to enhance the credibility of its operations. The company falsely asserted affiliations with prominent figures Laura Cha and Nicolas Aguzin, claiming them as its chairman and CEO, respectively. However, the SFC has refuted these affiliations. Laura Cha is the Chairman of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), while Nicolas Aguzin is the Executive Director and CEO of HKEX.Taking proactive measures, the SFC has requested the Hong Kong Police Force to block access to the websites of both HongKongDAO and BitCuped. Cease and desist letters have also been issued to the operators of these websites, demanding the cessation of the sale of HKD Tokens offered by HongKongDAO.Series of crypto scamsFollowing the JPEX fraud allegations in September, Hong Kong faced another cryptocurrency exchange scandal involving Hounax in November. With at least 145 police reports filed and a sum of over HK$148 million ($19 million) involved, affected investors expressed frustration at what they deemed a slow response from regulatory bodies.These incidents have reignited discussions about the need for more robust cryptocurrency regulations in Hong Kong. The city’s aspiration to become a global hub for crypto innovation and adoption faces challenges due to a lack of clear and consistent regulation, leaving investors vulnerable to fraud and manipulation.In light of these developments, the SFC emphasized the importance of public caution regarding investment opportunities that seem too good to be true. The regulator urged vigilance against social media and instant messaging platforms where individuals, not investment professionals, might lure unsuspecting investors.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Mar 27, 2025

Asia Web3 Alliance Japan seeks collaboration with U.S. SEC

The Asia Web3 Alliance Japan, an agency that regards itself as a bridge between the Web3 ecosystem in Asia and Japan’s broader business sector, has reached out to the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States with a view towards establishing a strategic collaboration.Photo by Clement Souchet on UnsplashFocus on Web3 regulatory innovation & tokenizationThe President of the organization, Hinza Asif, wrote to SEC Crypto Task Force Chairperson and SEC Commissioner, Hester Peirce, on the subject, on March 25. The letter, subsequently published by the SEC, sets out a proposal that centers on a strategic U.S.-Japan partnership relative to Web3 regulatory innovation and tokenization. The Japanese agency, which has set out cross-border synergy as one of its objectives, calls for collaboration between Japan’s Financial Services Agency, the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and the Bank of Japan with the U.S. regulator. The Alliance proposes that the goal of that partnership would be the establishment of regulatory clarity in respect of the Web3 sector, together with the fostering of interoperability between a developing Web3 ecosystem in the U.S. and the one that’s developing in Japan. Token classification frameworkDelving deeper into proposal specifics, Asif sets out the formation of a harmonized token classification framework as a key objective. The proposal suggests that a distinction needs to be made between tokenized securities, utility tokens and non-security digital assets.  The alliance believes that right now, token classification is unclear, with projects struggling to understand what category their token falls within from a regulatory perspective. There’s a lack of token offering frameworks. While it sees that further work is required, the Asia Web3 Alliance Japan is encouraged by progress made by the SEC’s Crypto Task Force in identifying security categories. With this cross-border collaboration, the Japanese crypto advocacy group believes that there is an opportunity to achieve regulatory interoperability on an international basis. That would facilitate compliant cross-border token issuance. On that basis, the alliance suggests that standards be developed such that regulatory consistency is achieved internationally when it comes to items such as digital asset trading, custody and token issuance. The proposal sets out a need for reciprocal disclosure requirements between the two jurisdictions where cross-border token issuance is concerned. It advocates for mutual recognition of what it terms “compliant tokenized offerings.” Bringing safe harbor to JapanAnother focus area contained within the proposal is the suggestion of a need to implement a safe harbor approach in Japan for early-stage token projects in line with what has been put forward in the U.S. Peirce first put forward a token safe harbor proposal in the U.S. in 2020. It sets out to provide exemptions over a defined initial period for certain token issuances. The idea behind it is to enable these early-stage projects to innovate and mature without getting bogged down in a regulatory quagmire. The establishment of a U.S.-Japan Web3 regulatory roundtable is another strand contained within the proposal. This would provide a mechanism for ongoing dialogue between stakeholders such as regulators, industry leaders and legal experts.

news
Loading