Binance Thailand CEO identifies Thai market shift from retail to institutions

Circle CEO Sees Role for Yuan-Backed Stablecoins in Hong KongJeremy Allaire, the Co-Founder and CEO of Circle, the USDC stablecoin operator, expressed his acceptance of mainland China’s ban on cryptocurrencies. However, he remains optimistic about the development of Web3 technology in Hong Kong and the city’s monetary authority’s move towards regulating stablecoins.Photo by Mitchell Luo on UnsplashYuan internationalizationAllaire believes that Hong Kong must embrace digital assets to remain relevant in the global financial market. While he acknowledges that China is unlikely to open up its markets to cryptocurrencies, he sees potential for stablecoins to contribute to Beijing’s goal of yuan internationalization.During an interview with the South China Morning Post (SCMP), Allaire highlighted that major financial markets worldwide are embracing digital assets and that the biggest financial institutions are adopting them. He mentioned that there is Chinese government support for stablecoins, but he clarified that it doesn’t imply opening up crypto trading on the mainland. Allaire emphasized that stablecoins could be a more immediate solution to the Chinese government’s aim of internationalizing the yuan compared to the central bank digital currency (CBDC) e-CNY.Allaire cited the example of a stablecoin pegged to the offshore yuan (CNH) as a potential tool to facilitate the RMB’s use in global trade and commerce. He mentioned the existence of CNH Coin, a stablecoin team that also offers HKD Coin, pegged to the Hong Kong dollar.Virtual asset hubHong Kong is positioning itself as a global virtual asset hub by focusing on the regulation of stablecoins. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has committed to implementing stablecoin regulations by 2024, recognizing the potential impact of such assets on financial markets. Additionally, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) is working on complementary regulations for stablecoins following the recent implementation of licensing rules for sellers of other cryptocurrencies.Circle’s USDC, the second-largest US dollar-backed stablecoin by market capitalization after Tether (USDT), is considered a “stored-value instrument” in the United States. Allaire expressed Circle’s encouragement regarding the HKMA’s plans and highlighted the positive motivation to expand their business in Hong Kong.While central banks worldwide have expressed concerns about stablecoins’ impact on financial stability, the HKMA has proposed that the value of reserve assets should match the outstanding stablecoins at all times. The HKMA has also been researching the possibility of a digital Hong Kong dollar and is part of a cross-border trial for the e-CNY using a blockchain known as the mBridge.CBDCs alongside stablecoinsRegarding the future role of stablecoins in a well-regulated environment alongside CBDCs, Allaire believes that CBDCs and private coins are complementary. He sees CBDCs as an upgrade to central banks’ systems and views the private sector’s work on innovation in distributed ledger technology as distinct and valuable.Allaire noted that Circle conducts significant business activity in Asia, particularly in Hong Kong, which is its largest non-US market, employing around 125 individuals.While mainland China maintains its ban on cryptocurrencies, Allaire remains optimistic about Hong Kong’s regulatory stance on stablecoins and believes they could contribute to the internationalization of the yuan. Allaire emphasized the importance of digital assets in the global financial market and expressed Circle’s support for Hong Kong’s initiatives.

Regulatory Caution Among Asian Nations Amid Reports of Illicit FinancingWith a plethora of reports of crypto-related terrorist financing having been published in recent weeks, it’s understood that Asian nations may be looking to exercise caution when it comes to the current ongoing process of establishing regulatory guidelines for crypto.That’s according to a report published by the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Thursday. The use of cryptocurrency by Hamas to fund its attack on Israel is being seen as the catalyst that may drive authorities in various Asian nations to take a more cautious approach to regulating digital currencies, according to analysts cited by the publication.Raj Kapoor, the founder of India Blockchain Alliance (IBA), commented on these recent developments, stating:”It is a kick on the backside for most governments. All regulatory bodies will take a closer look at crypto regulation. Governments will need to start implementing new rules and regulations.”At the recent G20 summit held in New Delhi, a joint declaration called for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of crypto assets, among other measures. The declaration emphasized the importance of supporting “a coordinated and comprehensive policy and regulatory framework.”Kapoor stressed the importance of revisiting the declaration and developing solutions to implement its objectives.Photo by Adolfo Félix on UnsplashRenewed scrutinyEvents in Palestine in recent weeks have led to renewed scrutiny when it comes to monitoring illicit financing activity via cryptocurrency. Only days following the recent Hamas attack, Israeli authorities moved to freeze specified crypto accounts.That scrutiny has continued in recent days, with more accounts having been frozen on crypto platforms such as Binance, while more still have been identified as suspicious, with requests for further information having been submitted in respect of over 200 additional accounts.On Wednesday it emerged that the United States Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) had sanctioned a Gaza-based crypto platform.Potential over-reactionWhile crypto-related terrorist financing has been widely publicized, blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis warned on Wednesday that crypto’s role in this illicit activity has likely been overstated. In its blog post on the subject, the firm stated:“Although terrorism financing is a very small portion of the already very small portion of cryptocurrency transaction volume that is illicit, some terrorist organizations raise, store, and transfer funds using cryptocurrency.”Additionally, Chainalysis stated that it had seen “overstated metrics and flawed analyses of these terrorist groups’ use of cryptocurrency.” Peter Van Valkenburgh, Director of Research at non-profit crypto advocacy group Coin Center, also believes that reporting on the matter is not balanced. Taking to X, he stated:“Sensational early reporting on the scale of Hamas crypto fundraising significantly misstated the amounts involved.”Coin Center’s Director of Communications, Neeraj Agrawal, highlighted an article which claimed that crypto “fueled Hamas’ terror attack on Israel” in its title, only to reveal within the body of the article that “cryptocurrency is still far from the largest funding source for terrorism.”Anndy Lian, a Singapore-based author and inter-governmental blockchain adviser, noted that while some countries may consider banning cryptocurrencies as a solution, this could merely drive illicit financing underground and make it more challenging to trace and halt. Lian argued that cryptocurrencies are traceable and trackable, unlike traditional fiat currencies like US dollars.

Korean Supreme Court acquits Dunamu Chairman Song Chi-hyungThe Supreme Court of South Korea, in a significant ruling on Thursday (local time), acquitted Song Chi-hyung, chairman and principal stakeholder of Dunamu, of fraud and forgery charges, according to a report by local news agency Yonhap. This ruling is particularly noteworthy because Dunamu is the operator of the nation’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit.This decision, led by Justice Oh Kyung-mi, marks the culmination of a legal battle that began with Song’s indictment in Dec. 2018, and it extends to the acquittal of the company’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the head of the Data Value Team, who were jointly indicted.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashBackground of the caseSong Chi-hyung and his colleagues were alleged to have fabricated an account on Upbit between September and November 2017. They had been accused of feigning the deposit of assets valued at KRW 122.1 billion and then employing these fictitious funds to enable transactions among actual members.The prosecution also leveled fraud charges against them, claiming that the fabricated account was utilized to sell 11,550 bitcoins to 26,000 members, thereby generating KRW 149.1 billion.The Seoul Southern District Court, acting as the court of first instance, found them not guilty. The court reasoned that the evidence presented by the prosecution was insufficient to establish that the defendants actually deposited the assets in the account.Issues with the prosecution’s evidence gatheringThe Seoul High Court, serving as the appellate court, identified problems with the evidence provided by the prosecution, determining that part of it lacked credibility due to improper collection methods. Notably, the court observed that the prosecution had directed Dunamu employees to access their Amazon cloud server to download the account’s transaction history. However, since this remote server was not included in the search and seizure warrant, the court highlighted the illegitimacy of the evidence.The appellate court also pointed out another issue with the evidence: documents stored on the CFO’s USB drive. The prosecution did not follow the legitimate search process, which requires them to extract only data related to the allegations. Moreover, the prosecutors did not present a warrant when confiscating the laptop of the Data Value Team’s lead, further undermining the credibility of their evidence.The court further stated that even if the remaining evidence provided by the prosecution was considered viable, it was still insufficient to substantiate the prosecution’s accusations.The prosecution, disagreeing with the decision of the appeals court, had escalated the case to the Supreme Court. However, the highest court in the nation sided with the ruling of the appeals court, effectively upholding the decision made at the appellate level.