Grab partners with Solana ecosystem DePIN project to enhance mapping

Suspected Malicious Activity Drains AnySwap Tokens via Multichain ExecutorAccording to an on-chain sleuth known as Spreek, a person is using the Multichain Executor to drain tokens associated with the AnySwap bridging protocol.Multichain is a cross-chain routing network, established and maintained by a Chinese developer team. It supports in excess of 25 blockchains and more than 1,100 tokens.Photo by Marek Piwnicki on Unsplash$100 million outflowThis revelation comes after abnormal outflows of over $100 million from Multichain bridges on July 7, which were flagged by the Multichain team. Spreek’s report via Twitter on July 10 states that the Multichain Executor address has been draining anyToken addresses across multiple chains and transferring them to a new externally owned account (EOA).Evidence provided in the report includes an Ethereum transaction, 0x53ede4462d90978b992b0a88727de19afe4e96f0374aa1a221b8ff65fda5a6fe, which called the “anySwapFeeTo” method on the Multichain Router: V4 contract. This transaction resulted in approximately $15,275.90 worth of anyDAI being minted on Ethereum, sent to the Multichain Executor, burned, and exchanged for the underlying DAI backing the asset.The funds from these transactions were sent to the following address:0x1eed63efba5f81d95bfe37d82c8e736b974f477b. Similarly, on the BNB Smart Chain (BSC), the Multichain Executor used the anySwapFeeTo function to convert $208,997 worth of anyUSDC into Binance-pegged USDC and sent them to the same address. Additionally, 50.80 anyBTC, equivalent to $39,251.43 at the time, was converted into Binance-pegged Bitcoin and sent to the address.In total, approximately $263,524.33 worth of tokens were sent to this address through the anySwapFeeTo method. Spreek suggests that this behavior could be part of the protocol’s normal functioning. However, a different account engaged in similar activity the day before and ultimately sold the drained tokens, indicating malicious intent.Potential exploitSpreek theorizes that the attacker may be exploiting the anySwapFeeTo function by setting fees to an arbitrarily large amount, allowing them to drain users’ funds. The function apparently permits setting any value, enabling the address to choose the total value of the token held in that anyToken.The Multichain incident has puzzled blockchain analysts, as it remains unclear whether it resulted from an exploit or if it was simply large token-holders moving their funds between networks. The mystery began on July 7 when over $100 million worth of tokens were withdrawn from the Ethereum side of Multichain’s bridges and transferred to wallet addresses with no prior transactions. This represented the majority of funds held on each bridge.Hack or rug pullThe Multichain team labeled these withdrawals as “abnormal” and advised users to stop using the protocol. However, they have not disclosed the source or nature of the anomaly. In response to the incident, stablecoin issuers Circle and Tether froze some of the addresses involved in the suspicious transactions. Chainanalysis, a blockchain analytics firm, has commented that the incident appears more like a hack or rug pull rather than a migration.Adding to the complexity, the Multichain team has reported that their CEO is missing, and they have shut down certain bridges due to losing access to some of the network’s multi-party computation network servers. There have been various concerns relative to Multichain since May. The situation continues to evolve, with ongoing investigations and efforts to mitigate any potential damage caused by the suspected malicious activity.

Chinese Pull Crypto TV Video Following Binance CEO’s CommentsEarlier this week, a Chinese state-owned TV channel featured a segment shedding light on Bitcoin, emphasizing its surging popularity and widespread adoption. The piece, broadcast on China Central Television (CCTV) on Wednesday, was met with enthusiasm from crypto proponents. However, on Thursday the video was removed from the TV broadcaster’s platform.Photo by Road Trip with Raj on UnsplashA perceived policy shiftThe segment sought to provide viewers with a comprehensive overview of digital assets, their diverse applications, and potential benefits. The reaction of Changpeng Zhao (CZ), CEO of global crypto exchange Binance, stoked up further community interest. Taking to Twitter, CZ stated:“CCTV (China Central Television) just broadcasted crypto. It’s a big deal. The Chinese speaking communities are buzzing. Historically, coverages like these led to bull runs.”CZ’s tweet reverberated throughout the crypto space, leaving many curious about his perspective on the TV segment’s significance. A highly influential personality in the crypto sector, CZ later clarified his stance, asserting that the segment signaled a shift in China’s approach to cryptocurrencies. He proposed that the state media’s coverage reflected a more positive sentiment and hinted at a potentially evolving regulatory landscape.Video removalSoon after CZ’s comments, the Chinese state media broadcaster removed the video segment focusing on Bitcoin. This development raised eyebrows and fueled speculations regarding the motives behind its removal. Within the crypto community, many speculated that CZ’s mention of the segment might have prompted Chinese authorities to take it down. However, the precise reasons behind the removal remain uncertain.One of the events that triggered the video segment appears to have been news earlier this week that Hong Kong is moving to enable crypto trading at a retail level. There’s been significant reporting on crypto developments related to Hong Kong over the course of the past six months. There has been a notable policy shift, and it appears that Chinese authorities are happy to see Hong Kong compete openly to become a regional hub for the crypto sector.There’s no doubt that people in the crypto sector would like to see signs of a softening of the approach to crypto in mainland China too. Many might have perceived this TV airtime as an indicator of that. However, it’s more likely that the Chinese are pursuing a dual-pronged strategy. They’re very cleverly participating in the developing innovation in digital assets via the Chinese autonomous territory of Hong Kong, while at the same time, maintaining a hardline stance against crypto on the mainland.The crypto sector continues to progress, and the regulatory landscape is ever-changing within various jurisdictions. On that basis, and given the importance of the Chinese market, it’s worthwhile to continue to closely monitor China’s actions. Any changes in the country’s approach to cryptocurrencies can have far-reaching consequences for the industry.Whether this recent event signals a more optimistic outlook or merely underscores the persisting regulatory uncertainty, it serves as a reminder that the crypto landscape is in constant evolution, holding surprises around every corner.

Cake Group co-founder files application to wind up company in SingaporeChua U-Zyn, the co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of crypto firm Cake Group, has officially applied to the Singapore High Court to initiate the winding-up process for the company.A winding-up notice appeared in Singapore’s The Straits Times on Thursday. U-Zyn is being represented by law firm Rajah & Tann on the matter. The court will now decide whether to grant this application, which was filed on Dec. 1.Photo by Kelvin Zyteng on UnsplashFinancial strugglesCake Group is the parent company of the crypto platform Bake, which made headlines last month for announcing significant staff reductions affecting 30% of its workforce. Bake is an automated market maker (AMM) and decentralized exchange (DEX) that revolves around Binance’s BNB Smart Chain (BSC).In existence for some five years, the platform claims to have over 1 million users worldwide, retaining over $1 billion in customer assets and having achieved reward payouts to date of $411 million.Cake Group’s financial struggles have been evident, with its revenue plummeting by over half to $266 million in 2022, while profits experienced a fivefold decrease to $23.5 million during the same period. The company generates income through transaction fees.A hearing for creditors or opposing parties is scheduled for Dec. 22, providing an opportunity for stakeholders to voice concerns or contest the winding-up process.Internal disputeWhile the specifics behind U-Zyn’s winding-up application remain unclear, the decline in financial performance and the recent layoffs are undoubtedly contributing factors.It’s understood that CEO Julian Hosp learned about the filing on Dec. 6 and has since emphasized that the company is actively working with legal counsel to challenge the application. Hosp will challenge this request in court, asserting that the company’s finances are strong and unrelated to the dispute.Taking to the X social media platform on Thursday, Hosp wrote:”Disappointed to see U-Zyn filing a request on December 1st” . . . “For me, it’s selfish that he’s prioritizing his own interests over those of our customers, employees, and partners, instead of resolving it internally.”Hosp added that U-Zyn’s application is unrelated to the company’s finances and that the firm is financially solvent.Former employees, speaking anonymously to Tech in Asia, expressed surprise at the escalating situation, describing the co-founders as emotionally charged and seemingly unable to safeguard their investment.U-Zyn opposed to layoffsThe court filing under Section 125(1)(i) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act of 2018 adds an element of uncertainty. Unlike other sections that typically specify reasons for winding up, this particular section allows for liquidation if “the Court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company be wound up.”Hosp clarified that the application is not based on Cake Group’s inability to pay its debts, emphasizing that day-to-day operations continue at full capacity.It’s understood that the ongoing dispute between U-Zyn and Hosp stems from internal disagreements, particularly related to cuts within the company’s engineering division. Chua claimed Hosp excluded him from decisions, especially concerning the recent layoffs.Despite the internal discord, Hosp stressed the company’s commitment to resolving the dispute swiftly and maintaining its operational capabilities. Undeterred by his fellow co-founder’s actions, he published a blog post on Thursday, outlining his vision for the Cake Group moving forward.