Top

Chinese Court Recognizes Virtual Assets as Legal Property

Policy & Regulation·September 01, 2023, 11:38 PM

According to a recent report published by the People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China, a Chinese court has recognized the legal status of virtual assets, having analyzed their attributes within the framework of Chinese criminal law.

The court unequivocally stated that virtual assets are considered legal property under the current legal policy framework and are thus protected by law.

The People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China exercise judicial power independently, free from interference by administrative or public organizations. They have responsibility for adjudicating civil, criminal, and administrative cases.

Photo by Christian Lue on Unsplash

 

Property classification

Local news source Odaily News reported on the development on Friday, indicating that the report, titled “Identification of the Property Attributes of Virtual Currency and Disposal of Property Involved in the Case,” explicitly recognized the economic attributes of virtual assets, leading to their classification as property.

This declaration is particularly significant in light of China’s sweeping ban on decentralized cryptocurrencies. Despite this ban, the report argues that virtual assets held by individuals should enjoy legal protection within the existing policy framework.

Furthermore, the report proposed recommendations for addressing crimes involving virtual assets. It emphasized that in cases where money and property are involved, confiscation should be based on the integration of criminal and civil law. The approach taken aims to strike a balance between safeguarding personal property rights while also addressing broader social and public interests.

 

Contentious approach to crypto

While China has been making every effort to promote its central bank digital currency (CBDC) and the development of blockchain and metaverse-related technology within the country, its stance on decentralized cryptocurrencies has been contentious at best.

Its approach in that respect has been marked by a blanket ban on crypto-related activities such as mining and trading and the prohibition of foreign crypto exchanges from serving customers within mainland China. Nevertheless, Chinese courts have consistently taken a more nuanced view without necessarily contradicting the government’s approach.

 

Differing interpretations

The divergence between national policy and court rulings first emerged in 2019 when the Hangzhou Internet Court found that Bitcoin is a form of virtual property, and on that basis, it is safeguarded by the law from the point of view of property rights. In May 2022, a Shanghai court affirmed that Bitcoin qualifies as virtual property and, as such, falls under the purview of property rights.

 

Global issue

It’s not just the Chinese courts that are grappling with the issue of clarifying property rights relative to virtual assets. In April of this year, a case in Hong Kong involving defunct crypto exchange Gatecoin resulted in the courts determining that cryptocurrency is property and that on that basis, it’s “capable of being held in trust.”

In July a Singaporean court determined that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and on that basis, it should be recognized as property. Earlier this year, the High Court of Justice in London recognized non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as property.

The report from the People’s Court reaffirms the legal status of virtual assets as protected property under Chinese law. This development highlights the ongoing divergence between China’s regulatory policy and the judicial interpretation of virtual assets, signaling a potential evolution in the country’s approach to cryptocurrencies.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Sep 12, 2023

Wemade Leverages Blockchain to Host Professional Women’s Golf Tournament in Busan

Wemade Leverages Blockchain to Host Professional Women’s Golf Tournament in BusanWemade, a blockchain game company headquartered in South Korea, is gearing up to host a professional women’s golf tournament at the Haeundae Beach Golf and Resort in Busan, the nation’s southern port city. The tournament is scheduled to take place from November 18 to 19.Photo by mk. s on Unsplash1 million WEMIX prize poolThe event, titled the WEMIX Championship 2023, will showcase the top 20 KLPGA Tour golfers in the WEMIX point ranking, along with four invited players. They will vie for a prize pool of 1 million WEMIX, which, as per CoinMarketCap, is trading at $0.5585 at the time of publication. The tournament will be live-streamed through the SBS Golf television channel.The WEMIX point ranking, established in collaboration with SBS Golf, is determined by assessing the performance and results achieved by members of the regular Korea Ladies Professional Golf Association (KLPGA) Tour.NFT tickets and souvenirsDuring this event, Wemade’s DAO and NFT platform, NILE, will showcase non-fungible tokens (NFTs) that represent admission tickets and official souvenirs. These NFTs will be available for purchase on the NILE marketplace starting in October, giving golf enthusiasts the opportunity to acquire them.By integrating blockchain technology into the golf tournament, Wemade is expected to deliver a fresh and innovative experience for both organizers and spectators alike.Furthermore, Wemade aims to increase its investment in the WEMIX Championship, with the goal of enhancing the tournament’s reputation as a prestigious season-ending event.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 19, 2023

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm Misrepresentation

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm MisrepresentationThe Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.Photo by Marcel Eberle on UnsplashBanking ordinance violationsIn a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.Misuse of banking termsAny entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Nov 14, 2023

Upbit D Conference participants share insights on Web3 and blockchain

Upbit D Conference participants share insights on Web3 and blockchainBlockchain specialists from 29 countries gathered on Monday (local time) at Upbit D Conference (UDC) 2023 in Seoul to explore capital markets in the forthcoming Web3 era. This era is characterized by user-controlled, communal data management, a notable shift from the Web2 space where major tech corporations held dominant control over data.Organized by Dunamu, the operator of South Korea’s Upbit cryptocurrency exchange, the conference featured 39 experts, focusing on the transformative potential of blockchain technology in this new internet phase.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashAsset tokenization and investment opportunitiesAccording to a report by the Asia Business Daily, one of the key speakers at the conference, Wally Yu, a Solutions Architect at San Francisco-based Chainlink Labs, delved into how cross-chain solutions and asset tokenization could add to the financial industry. He explained that Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP), designed to connect various blockchains, is only beginning to reveal its capabilities in integrating with traditional financial markets. Yu pointed out the growing interest from banks in tokenizing their conventional assets and transferring them to the blockchain. This move, he suggested, could lead to increased liquidity and open up new investment opportunities.Yu also compared the current DeFi market to traditional sectors like stock, real estate, and derivatives, noting DeFi’s relatively smaller scale. However, he underlined blockchain’s transparency as a key advantage over traditional markets, where transparency is often lacking. According to Yu, the adoption of blockchain by traditional financial firms could address longstanding issues more effectively.Looking ahead to the Web3 era, Yu envisioned a scenario where different tokens are interconnected, potentially bringing an estimated $900 trillion worth of assets onto the blockchain. This, he believes, would significantly enhance liquidity in the financial markets.From Web2 to Web3During the conference, Korean mobile network provider SK Telecom’s (SKT) Vice President, Oh Se-hyun, outlined the company’s forward-looking strategy to transition its 30 million subscribers from Web2 to Web3. She highlighted SKT’s search for high-value markets to expand its business scope, underscoring the company’s active efforts in constructing Web3 infrastructure. This strategic pivot aligns with their vision for the upcoming Web3 era.SKT, which established its Web3 division in 2017, initially engaged in developing a private mainnet. However, the company has since shifted its focus towards services aimed at boosting customer engagement, such as custody, web and app services. Oh emphasized the need for Web3 wallets to support a diverse range of assets and decentralized applications (dApps), but she stressed that ease of use is paramount. She views that these wallets will serve as gateways for customers entering the blockchain space.SKT has developed and is improving its own Web3 wallet, dubbed Wallet T. Oh shared her belief that the future of financial business models will pivot from traditional and big-tech banks to those based on public chains. In preparation for this shift, SKT is contemplating strategies to embrace blockchain-based Web3 services.Crypto regulationThe conference also touched on the potential integration of virtual assets within regulatory frameworks. There’s growing anticipation in the market for the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, especially following the inclusion of asset manager BlackRock’s proposed spot bitcoin ETF in the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation’s (DTCC) clearing-house eligibility file.Emily Parker, Executive Director at CoinDesk, mentioned that a spot bitcoin ETF is on the horizon in the U.S. She anticipated that such a development would not only boost cryptocurrency prices but also positively impact the market for non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Echoing this sentiment, Oh Se-hyun from SKT predicted that the approval of a spot bitcoin ETF could unlock access to a $30 trillion market.SKT’s Oh also addressed the complexities surrounding the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies. She acknowledged the challenge facing authorities in developing these regulations all at once, highlighting the gradual progress in this area. She cited the outcome of Ripple’s lawsuit in the U.S., which resulted in Ripple’s XRP tokens being classified differently for different investors: as a security for institutional investors but not for retail investors. Additionally, Oh pointed to the upcoming Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) in the European Union, slated for implementation in December 2024. She emphasized that the establishment of such regulatory guidelines brings clarity and reduces uncertainty, which can be reassuring for businesses operating in the crypto space.Providing further insights into this matter, Kim Gap-rae, a senior researcher at the Korea Capital Market Institute (KCMI), spoke about the importance of regulatory clarity in the cryptocurrency sector. He pointed out that it’s more crucial for governments to have clear regulations rather than focusing on the extent of regulation. Understanding new regulatory or legislative trends is essential for governments as they look to develop new infrastructures.According to Kim, a potential spot bitcoin ETF approval in the U.S. could prompt South Korea to consider a similar approval. However, he noted that Korea currently lacks a regulatory framework for Bitcoin custody, which could lead to a competitive environment among crypto companies in the country. Kim believes that a deeper understanding of custodian regulations will enable better adaptation to new types of ETFs and foster their growth in Korea.

news
Loading