Top

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm Misrepresentation

Policy & Regulation·September 19, 2023, 1:02 AM

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.

Photo by Marcel Eberle on Unsplash

 

Banking ordinance violations

In a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.

In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.

The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.

Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.

 

Misuse of banking terms

Any entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.

It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.

The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.

According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.

Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.

The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Nov 29, 2023

KuCoin affiliate applies for license in Hong Kong amid identity mix-up

KuCoin affiliate applies for license in Hong Kong amid identity mix-upIn a recent development on the Hong Kong crypto scene, VAEXC Limited, a cryptocurrency exchange, has submitted an application for a crypto trading license. The move had sparked a misunderstanding as some reports suggested the application was submitted by a Binance-linked company when in fact, it turns out to be a KuCoin-affiliated entity.Photo by Stella P on UnsplashReporting confusionA report published in October by the South China Morning Post (SCMP) asserted that a newly established crypto exchange named HKVAEX appeared to be connected with global crypto platform Binance.In the meantime, it emerged more recently that an application for a trading license had been submitted by the similarly named VAEXC Limited. While many reports confused this entity with what is believed to be a Binance-linked company, subsequent reports have emerged to confirm that the application pertains to an entity associated with the Seychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency exchange, KuCoin.In response to these initial wayward reports, a HKVAEX spokesperson confirmed that the company is in the process of preparing a licensing application in Hong Kong but that it has yet to do so. The spokesperson stated:“We are still in the preparatory stages for the application” . . . “VAEXC is an entirely separate applicant, and our operations are completely independent.”Leveraging KuCoin technologyThe SFC updated the list of virtual asset trading platform applicants on Nov. 27, disclosing that Hong Kong VAEXC Limited submitted its application on Nov. 25. Operating under the name VAEX, the exchange places a strong emphasis on security and regulatory compliance, positioning itself as a next-generation, trusted virtual asset exchange.Backed by a team with extensive industry expertise and leveraging KuCoin Tech, VAEX aims to offer a secure, reliable, stable and user-friendly platform for crypto asset trading and management. In celebration of VAEX’s launch, KuCoin conducted a public testing campaign, featuring a 15,000 USDT prize pool for eligible KuCoin users and participants.Despite the recent scandals in Hong Kong’s crypto scene — including an alleged fraud at the JPEX crypto exchange and more recently still, an alleged Ponzi scheme orchestrated by unlicensed crypto exchange Hounax — the regulatory stance in Hong Kong remains unwaveringly positive where digital assets are concerned.Introduced in June, regulations in Hong Kong mandate cryptocurrency exchanges to apply for a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license from the SFC by June 2024 or face de-registration. Notably, unregistered exchanges are permitted to operate during the interim transition period.KuCoin’s investment arm, KuCoin Ventures, has also been active in Hong Kong. In March, the firm led a $10 million investment in CNHC, a Hong Kong-based stablecoin issuer. Three months later, amid a changing regulatory environment in 2023, the platform confirmed a tightening of its compliance procedures with the introduction of mandatory know-your-customer (KYC) identity checks.Meanwhile, it’s unclear as to what plans Binance has to expand in Hong Kong if any. The leading global exchange is facing very challenging legal issues in the United States currently. That could have a bearing on its plans in Hong Kong, while it remains unclear as to what level of involvement it has with HKVAEX.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Oct 26, 2023

SC Ventures and Deutsche Bank Execute Stablecoin Payments via UDPN

SC Ventures and Deutsche Bank Execute Stablecoin Payments via UDPNSC Ventures, the Singaporean disruptive technology investment subsidiary of UK banking conglomerate Standard Chartered, has partnered with Deutsche Bank in completing the first successful proof of concept (PoC) for the Universal Digital Payments Network (UDPN).Photo by Conny Schneider on UnsplashConnecting blockchain networks with CBDCsThe UDPN is a brainchild of Hong Kong’s Red Date Technology, which in turn is a co-founder of the Chinese Blockchain-Based Service Network (BSN). The PoC was aimed at facilitating seamless connections between central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and various blockchain networks through message-based transactions.News of the successful PoC emerged via a report by India’s English-language business newspaper Financial Express earlier this week. In conventional finance and international payments, the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) is the foremost, dominant financial messaging service. Notably, UDPN distinguishes itself from SWIFT as it operates on a permissioned blockchain, ensuring heightened security and regulatory compliance.As part of the PoC, several real-time transfers and swaps of synthetic USDC and EURS (Stasis Euro stablecoin) were executed between the two banks. While SC Ventures utilized code that leveraged UDPN software development kits (SDKs) and APIs, Deutsche Bank employed a graphical user interface. Rafael Otero, CTO and CPO of Deutsche Bank’s Corporate Bank division, emphasized the significance of this trial, stating that it provides an opportunity to explore how clients can actively engage in the decentralized global economy. Otero sees this as the logical next step in the evolution of financial transactions.Overcoming digital currency adoption challengesUDPN has been under development in collaboration with consultancy firm GFT Technologies and DLA Piper’s Hong Kong-based digital asset creation platform, TOKO, with further governance provided by the UDPN Alliance.The primary goal of UDPN is to overcome the hurdles that hinder the broader adoption of digital currencies, especially in the face of the surging number of CBDCs, stablecoins, and deposit tokens. The lack of interoperability among these digital assets necessitates innovative solutions.Currently, interoperability among stablecoins primarily relies on centralized cryptocurrency exchanges. However, due to the absence of proper oversight and regulatory framework in these exchanges, this method is not a sustainable solution for achieving interoperability between CBDCs and deposit tokens.UDPN takes a unique approach by providing a decentralized identity infrastructure. The actual currency transactions occur on their respective native blockchains or infrastructures. This means that UDPN enables users to seamlessly swap a USDC stablecoin on one network for a Euro stablecoin on another or even a bank deposit token.Improving upon financial messaging systemsAs UDPN incorporates an element of financial messaging for digital currencies, this hybrid approach streamlines transactions, eliminates the need for reconciliations, and enables atomic settlement. Therefore, UDPN ensures that either both sides of a transaction succeed or both fail. In contrast, purely messaging-based systems can result in one side of the transaction failing.SWIFT recently experimented with a messaging solution to connect CBDCs, and other conventional integration methods are being explored, involving APIs and routing networks, such as finP2P. It has collaborated with the central banks of Hong Kong and Kazakhstan recently in testing CBDC connectors.A report by Nikkei Asia last week suggested that Standard Chartered is venturing further into the world of digital currencies, particularly so in Asia, via SC Ventures.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 08, 2023

Taiwan to Restrict Offshore Non-Complaint Exchanges

Taiwan to Restrict Offshore Non-Complaint ExchangesTaiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) has been working towards taking proactive steps to regulate the cryptocurrency industry within its borders recently. One key guiding principle it has developed is to impose strict regulation on offshore crypto exchanges operating in Taiwan.Photo by Vas on UnsplashTen guiding principlesTaiwan’s Central News Agency reported on Thursday that in an effort to ensure compliance and protect consumers, the FSC has developed ten guiding principles for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). These principles are set to be officially released by the end of this month, according to a government official.The guiding principles will encompass several important aspects of the crypto industry. They will emphasize the need for enhanced information disclosure, requiring businesses to establish clear review standards for the listing and delisting of virtual assets. Additionally, there will be a focus on ensuring the separation and proper custody of assets belonging to both companies and customers.Focusing on offshore complianceThe FSC intends to make it clear that offshore crypto exchanges must adhere to proper compliance registration if they want to conduct business onshore. The move is in line with what appears to be a commitment by the Taiwanese authorities to promote responsible and secure cryptocurrency operations.One particularly significant restriction is the prohibition of illegal solicitation of business by foreign crypto firms. The FSC is determined to enforce this rule strictly. Foreign VASPs that fail to register according to company law and declare their compliance with anti-money laundering regulations to the FSC will be barred from soliciting business in Taiwan or catering to domestic residents.It’s worth noting that Taiwan has been proactive in implementing anti-money laundering laws for VASPs since July 2021. Although this particular measure has been in place, the cryptocurrency industry in Taiwan has largely operated in a regulatory vacuum. However, recent developments suggest a shift towards greater oversight and accountability.One notable example is Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, which has initiated the process of registering for anti-money laundering compliance in Taiwan. Despite not being fully regulated in the country, Binance has established a local entity, “Binance International Limited Taiwan Branch (Seychelles),” and received government approval for company registration.Building a regulatory frameworkIn addition to these regulatory efforts, the Ministry of Economic Affairs has proposed the creation of a new business category within relevant regulations. This move aims to facilitate the formation of cryptocurrency-related industry associations, encouraging the development of self-regulatory guidelines.The forthcoming guiding principles for VASPs are expected to provide much-needed clarity and structure to the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrencies within Taiwan’s borders.Many leading jurisdictions have been behind the curve in developing a clear, workable regulatory framework for crypto. That has led to many exchanges establishing themselves in offshore locations where light touch regulation is applied. It’s highly likely that the Taiwanese have examined the fallout from this development, best exemplified by the spectacular collapse of Bahamas-based FTX last November.

news
Loading