Top

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm Misrepresentation

Policy & Regulation·September 19, 2023, 1:02 AM

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.

Photo by Marcel Eberle on Unsplash

 

Banking ordinance violations

In a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.

In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.

The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.

Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.

 

Misuse of banking terms

Any entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.

It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.

The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.

According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.

Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.

The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Aug 01, 2023

Blockchain Solutions Provider Block Odyssey Launches NFT Ticket Service, “MakeDrop”

Blockchain Solutions Provider Block Odyssey Launches NFT Ticket Service, “MakeDrop”Korean blockchain solutions startup Block Odyssey said Monday it is launching an NFT-based ticket issuance service dubbed “MakeDrop” in an effort to revolutionize ticketing and event services in the era of Web3.Photo by Andrey Metelev on UnsplashLimitations of traditional digital ticketsUntil now, major ticket reservation platforms have made it challenging for event organizers to streamline the ticketing process for events such as corporate or campus gatherings, concerts, festivals, and more.Event organizers have thus had to manually send notifications via text messages and emails, print paper tickets, and directly manage overall ticket sales and distributions. The absence of tools to identify ticket holders from attendees also makes it difficult to accurately determine participation and contribution ratios.Blockchain meets ticketingBut with the rapid advancement of digitized ticket issuance, NFT tickets have been gaining traction as a transparent and secure solution to such challenges. These tickets are verified and stored on a blockchain, setting them apart from traditional forms of digital tickets such as barcodes.About MakeDropBlock Odyssey’s MakeDrop is an open service that allows anyone to easily create, issue, and manage one-of-a-kind NFT tickets with individual ownership rights and transaction history. If secondary ticket transactions occur, all ownership changes can be verified on the blockchain, making it possible to block attempts at fraudulent or repetitive secondary trading.The service is particularly convenient for users, as they can automatically generate a wallet address for storing their NFTs by logging in to social media accounts without having to install a separate cryptocurrency wallet.As for event organizers, they can swiftly issue mobile tickets without using third-party ticket reservation platforms. Ticket invitations are sent to recipients via KakaoTalk, South Korea’s most popular messaging app, making the service more accessible as well. Those who have not received an invitation can still apply for participation if the event is public. Upon acceptance by the organizer, they will receive an approval notification through KakaoTalk, Block Odyssey explained.Participants can then present the NFT ticket’s QR code on the day of an event, and organizers can conduct real-time validation using the QR check feature provided by MakeDrop.Notably, while traditional ticket reservation platforms often do not share ticket holder information with event organizers, MakeDrop allows independent information management for all events. This allows organizers to identify low-engagement or idle members and offer more benefits to loyal participants.As part of its website launch promotion, MakeDrop is currently holding an event to distribute 100,000 free NFT tickets. The company also plans to release a mobile app in the future after incorporating user feedback and enhancing functionalities.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Nov 08, 2023

Korean crypto firms relocating for cheaper rent amid prolonged crypto winter

Korean crypto firms relocating for cheaper rent amid prolonged crypto winterAs the prolonged crypto winter continues to affect the industry, blockchain and cryptocurrency firms in South Korea are under pressure to economize. Faced with a deteriorating business and investment climate, numerous companies are reducing their office space and relocating to areas with cheaper rent, according to a Wednesday (local time) report by local media outlet Bizwatch.Photo by Nastuh Abootalebi on UnsplashReducing operating costsBizwatch reported, citing industry sources, that Parameta (previously Iconloop), a blockchain enterprise, has relocated its headquarters from Seoul’s upscale Signature Towers to a more economical shared office space this year. This strategic move is interpreted as an effort to slash operating costs by choosing a location with significantly lower rental expenses. A Parameta representative confirmed that the relocation was part of measures to reduce costs.Binance-backed Streami, which runs the Gopax cryptocurrency exchange, is also reportedly contemplating an office relocation after downsizing its staff. The company’s workforce has dwindled from over 100 employees earlier in the year to approximately 60 by September. A Streami spokesperson has indicated that they have yet to reach a decision regarding the relocation. Streami’s situation is particularly significant due to its ongoing challenges in securing approval from financial regulators for changes to its executive representatives since Binance acquired a majority stake. Recently, Streami appointed a new CEO from the domestic tech firm CityLabs, which has also purchased an 8.55% stake in Streami and intends to further increase its investment in the exchange operator.Similarly, Korea Digital Exchange, the operator of cryptocurrency-only exchange Flybit, has listed for sale one of its two floors of office space in Seoul’s Seocho district. This move comes nearly a year and eight months after the company expanded into the current premises.Changes in workforce sizesBefore the crypto winter, when the Korean crypto market witnessed unprecedented growth, numerous companies expanded their offices to make room for the growing workforce, bolstered by rising revenues. For instance, Dunamu, which runs Upbit — Korea’s largest crypto exchange — garnered attention for acquiring pricey real estate in Gangnam to construct a new office.However, the boom was short-lived. With the onset of the crypto downturn, numerous companies found themselves having to shut down. Blockchain technology firms are facing similar challenges, with many developers steering away from the sector due to persisting market instability. For many of these firms, the workforce has diminished as they’ve either undergone restructuring or struggled to recruit replacements for departing employees.An industry insider remarked that reducing operating costs is a logical step for companies facing a lack of investment and revenue. They noted that this only applies to those resilient enough to weather the hardship, adding that many cryptocurrency-only exchanges are likely to shut down completely in these challenging conditions.In fact, Cashierest, a crypto-only exchange, recently announced the cease of operations. Concerns about the company had been growing after staff layoffs and the departure of its CEO in July. A thorough analysis by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) found that, of the 21 Korean crypto-only exchanges, 18 are operating with negative shareholder equity as of the first half of this year. Moreover, 10 did not earn any revenue from transaction fees during the same period.Crypto-only exchanges typically see lower trading volumes as they cannot facilitate trades in Korean won. In South Korea, only five trading platforms — Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax — are officially registered with the financial regulator to conduct fiat-to-crypto transactions.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jan 21, 2026

Hong Kong regulator underscores crypto rules in Davos, industry flags shortcomings

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po said digital assets should support the real economy, but only within a framework of strong safeguards to protect financial stability, market integrity, and investors.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashAccording to the South China Morning Post, Chan addressed a closed-door workshop on Jan. 20, where he highlighted the advantages of digital assets, including greater transparency, improved risk management, and more efficient capital movement. Reviewing milestones in the city’s crypto sector, Chan said that since 2023, Hong Kong has issued three tranches of tokenized green bonds worth a combined $2.1 billion. He also pointed to a Hong Kong Monetary Authority pilot launched last November that enables real-value transactions using tokenized deposits and digital assets. Chan added that the city’s stablecoin licensing regime is progressing, with the first licenses expected in the first quarter. Same risks, same regulationsWhile emphasizing the necessity of financial innovation, Chan highlighted Hong Kong’s regulatory philosophy, which dictates that identical activities posing identical risks must be subject to identical regulations. He explained that this approach is designed to promote healthy, responsible, and sustainable sector development, reiterating that protective measures against financial instability remain mandatory. As Hong Kong officials continue to promote the city’s digital asset push on the international stage, a local industry body has cautioned that proposed licensing frameworks for crypto trading, advisory, and management services may have unintended consequences if rolled out without transitional measures. Industry group calls for grace periodAccording to Cointelegraph, the Hong Kong Securities & Futures Professionals Association (HKSFPA) said in a submission to regulators that existing market participants could be compelled to halt operations under the new rules unless a grace period is provided. The association called for a transitional deeming arrangement of six to 12 months for firms that file licence applications before the regulations formally take effect. No definitive start date has been set for the planned virtual asset regulatory regimes, which remain under consultation. Two days before issuing those comments, the HKSFPA had cautioned that the planned introduction of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Crypto Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and related Common Reporting Standard (CRS) amendments could create new operational and legal risks for local firms. The group said it supported the policy direction in principle but warned that uncapped per-account penalties and open-ended director liability could raise compliance risks, urging regulators to introduce clear caps and legal safeguards. The association also called for lighter requirements for entities with no reportable activity, the development of data file preparation tools from both the industry and the Inland Revenue Department (IRD), and the ability to transfer record-keeping responsibilities to third parties upon dissolution. Elsewhere in the region, Japan implemented the CARF on Jan. 1, 2026. Users of Japanese exchanges must now declare tax residence, while operators are required to submit transaction data—including trading volumes and asset breakdowns—to tax authorities by April 30 of the following year. Data regarding non-resident users is expected to be shared with foreign authorities under international agreements. Other jurisdictions are following suit, with India planning to adopt the framework by 2027. 

news
Loading