Indian Crypto Exchange CoinDCX Implements Workforce Reduction

Polymarket activity under scrutiny in Taiwan due to election contractsTaiwanese law enforcement is currently delving into the activities of online influencers and community members promoting Polymarket contracts related to the upcoming presidential election which is due to be held on Jan. 13.Polymarket is a New York-based Ethereum-centric prediction market. The platform runs on the Ethereum layer-2 scaling solution network Polygon. The project invites platform users to bet on the outcomes of a broad spectrum of events, ranging from politics to entertainment.Users deposit USDC stablecoin, choose an event to bet on and purchase “outcome shares” through USDC. The user has the ability to trade those shares anytime before the resolution of the contract.Photo by Ethan Lin on UnsplashPossible election law violationsThe Taiwanese investigation came to light in a report by Taiwan-based crypto publication BlockTempo, which was published last week. The investigation comes as concerns arose about potential violations of Taiwan’s Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act, which explicitly prohibits gambling on election outcomes.Multiple influencers and crypto community members have reportedly been subpoenaed for their involvement in Polymarket contracts, allowing users to place bets on the January election. At present, the betting pool for the election holds over $300,000, with a market prediction favoring the Democratic Progressive Party’s Lai Ching-te, also known as William Lai, with a 78% chance of winning.However, the legality of such betting activities is in question under Article 88–1 of Taiwan’s election law. It stipulates that anyone gambling on the outcome of an election or recall in a public place or a place open to the public may face imprisonment, short-term detention or a fine of up to NT$100,000 ($3,196.85).Sherman Lin, an attorney at Taipei-based Lin & Partners, emphasized the seriousness with which law enforcement views gambling activities related to presidential elections in Taiwan. He explained that broad legal interpretations under the Presidential Election and Recall Act have led to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators targeting Taiwanese gamblers. Lin stated:“Law enforcement agencies in Taiwan are vigilant in investigating any gambling activities related to presidential elections.”“Broad legal interpretations have been applied to gambling crimes under the Presidential Election and Recall Act, leading to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators in Taiwan targeting Taiwanese gamblers,” he added.Prohibited in United StatesComparing the situation to the United States, where gambling on election outcomes is illegal in most states, Lin noted that enforcing such regulations often falls under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Polymarket’s Terms of Use explicitly prohibit usage by U.S. persons.Despite potential legal consequences for gambling activities in Taiwan, including participation, promotion and platform hosting for betting pools like Polymarket, Lin pointed out that enforcing actions against overseas entities poses jurisdictional challenges. Taiwan’s legal reach is primarily limited to domestic actors, creating complexities in addressing decentralized platforms like Polymarket.Lin suggested that law enforcement may focus on online influencers who promoted the Polymarket contract, as seen in previous cases involving the collapse of the unlicensed crypto exchange JPEX in Hong Kong.Moreover, while there are legal precedents for pursuing centralized entities organizing election gambling, Lin highlighted that no established legal precedent in Taiwan currently exists for decentralized platforms organizing election betting.

Seoul and Baobab Partners Face Controversy Over Unpaid Prize Winnings for SWF2023 HackathonThe city of Seoul has come under public scrutiny for failing to pay the winners of the Seoul Web3 Festival (SWF2023) Hackathon a cash prize worth KRW 150 million (approximately $112,000). The Seoul Metropolitan Government has argued that since it was simply a naming rights sponsor, the responsibility for paying the prizes lies with Baobab Partners, who co-hosted the event. However, critics argue that the city did not properly vet Baobab Partners more rigorously before hosting the event.Photo by okaybuild on PixabayUnpaid prizes lingerThe SWF2023 Hackathon took place from July 31 to August 2 at Dongdaemun Design Plaza (DDP) and was co-hosted by the city of Seoul, the Seoul Design Foundation, and Baobab Partners. It offered a total prize pool of KRW 150 million attracting 417 participants who made up 115 teams.However, although over two months have passed since then, the winners are yet to be paid their prize money. “Baobab Partners initially proposed the SWF2023 event, and they were responsible for gathering the necessary sponsorship funds to run the event,” said a city representative.According to industry sources on Monday, the company’s CEO, Choi Jin-beom, issued a handwritten apology last Friday regarding the incident. “We promised to pay the winners by today, but we were unable to deliver on that promise. We explored multiple avenues, including investors, new contractors, and other assets, but were ultimately unable to secure the funds to do so,” he said. “The narrative that the funds were diverted elsewhere or invested in cryptocurrencies or stocks is untrue,” he added, clarifying that related information was transparently disclosed to the city of Seoul.Baobab Partners’ swift rise raises industry eyebrowsBaobab Partners had previously participated as an event planner at last year’s Blockchain Week in Busan, which turned out to be a success. “We also spoke with the Busan city government, who gave a positive opinion of the company,” the representative added. It was under this context that Seoul entered into a naming rights agreement with Baobab Partners. The agreement stipulated that the company would be in charge of attracting and managing sponsorships, and the prize money and operational costs would be covered by corporate sponsorship funds.Nevertheless, questions have arisen within the industry about Baobab Partners’ short track record and its successive collaborations with public organizations. Baobab Partners is a startup that was founded in May 2021. In November of the same year, the firm signed memoranda of understanding with three blockchain companies during NFT Busan 2021, a large-scale NFT fair held in the southern port city to share the latest blockchain trends. As a result of its efforts, it was listed alongside prominent companies such as Coinone and Onther despite only six months passing since its establishment. Subsequently, Baobab Partners relocated from Seoul to Busan, and the following year, it participated as an event planner at Blockchain Week in Busan.Accumulating allegationsSpeculation suggests that this success was not solely due to Baobab Partners’s capabilities. The company’s CEO is believed to have political connections, according to an anonymous industry insider. Choi denied such claims and stressed that its technical expertise should not be downplayed, citing the fact that Baobab Partners was the first entity in Korea to develop virtual reality (VR) banking technology and had received a KRW 15 billion investment from Finger, a KOSDAQ-listed company.Baobab Partners has also been mired in controversy over supposedly unpaid wages. In response to a claim made by an industry source that many former employees of Baobab Partners have still not received their due wages, a Seoul representative stated that there is no such dispute according to conversations with company representatives, seeking to dispel the dispute. Choi further explained, “We didn’t have wage disputes until last year. The difficulty in paying wages began in January this year due to the failure to execute promised investment funds.”The city said that it is currently conducting legal examinations and looking into necessary measures for two matters involving Baobab Partners, including the handling of hackathon winnings.

Poly Network Exploit Results in Billions of Nonexistent TokensPoly Network, the China-based interoperability platform, was targeted by hackers over the weekend in a major attack that resulted in the creation of billions of tokens out of thin air. It’s the second time in as many years that the cross-chain bridge has been exploited by hackers.The attacker exploited a vulnerability in Poly Network’s cross-chain bridge tool, allowing them to generate a substantial number of tokens that previously did not exist, as reported by Arhat, the Founder of 3z3 Labs, on Twitter.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashNetwork suspensionThe Shanghai-based project team behind Poly Network promptly informed its users on Sunday that its services were temporarily suspended due to the attack. The platform assured its users that it was diligently assessing the extent of the breach and the impact on assets. They emphasized their commitment to safeguarding users’ assets and urged everyone to remain calm.The hacker, at one point, held nearly $43 billion worth of cryptocurrency in their digital wallet, according to DeBank, a decentralized finance portfolio tracker. This staggering figure was corroborated by PeckShield, a blockchain data and security firm.Bridge vulnerabilitiesBridges play a crucial role in the Web3 ecosystem, enabling users to transfer assets across different networks. However, they have often been attractive targets for hackers. In this attack on Poly Network, the hackers issued themselves nearly 100 million BNB and $10 billion worth of BUSD, the Binance-branded stablecoin, on the layer-2 network Metis, revealed Colin Wu, a Chinese crypto journalist.Similarly, on the Heco network, approximately 100 trillion units of the dog-themed meme coin, Shiba Inu, were created. Additionally, a significant number of altcoins were generated on Polygon and Avalanche networks.Illiquid Metis tokensMetis clarified that the BNB and BUSD tokens issued on its network by the hackers are effectively worthless since there is no available sell liquidity. Poly Network also locked these tokens, ensuring they cannot be utilized. Arhat of 3z3 Labs acknowledged that the impact of the Poly Network attack was somewhat mitigated by the lack of liquidity, which prevented the hackers from realizing substantial gains on Metis.However, on other networks like Ethereum, the stolen tokens were exchanged on decentralized exchanges. Arhat estimated that the attacker managed to convert only a small portion of the tokens, amounting to approximately $400,000 worth of crypto, while the remaining tokens lacked liquidity and were essentially worthless.SlowMist, a blockchain security firm, suggested that the hacker’s total gains were higher. They reported that over $4 million worth of digital assets from the attack had been cashed in, including 1,500 Ethereum worth $3 million and 93 billion SHIB worth $700,000.Poly Network had previously made headlines in 2021 when it experienced a historic attack, considered the largest exploit in decentralized finance at the time. The project suffered a loss of $600 million as funds were siphoned away from Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, and Polygon. However, the hacker eventually returned $342 million worth of stolen crypto, and Poly Network took steps to repay affected users.