Korea’s FSC Embarks on Developing Regulatory Framework for VASPs

EDX Markets, a crypto-trading platform backed by Citadel Securities and Fidelity Digital Assets, is planning to establish a new crypto exchange in Singapore. EDX ClearingThe plan was revealed in a recent Bloomberg article. In tandem with the report, a press release published on Tuesday also provided further detail on its recently-launched digital asset clearinghouse, EDX Clearing. Unlike traditional exchanges, EDX operates its own clearinghouse, following a non-custodial model in collaboration with Anchorage Digital. This approach allows institutional investors to execute trades without the need for pre-funding in fiat currency or crypto, contributing to capital efficiency and risk management. Since its launch in October, EDX Clearing has cleared more than $3.1 billion of transactions. The recent approval of bitcoin exchange-traded funds has further intensified trading activity, with substantial volumes traded following their launch. EDX Markets offers a unique platform for institutional investors to directly trade major cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, ether and litecoin. EDX addresses institutional players' needs with a non-custodial model, emphasizing risk management and infrastructure that aligns with traditional market practices.Photo by Julien de Salaberry on UnsplashFresh funding infusionThe company is also introducing spot and perpetual futures trading, following a successful additional funding round led by new investor Pantera Capital and existing supporter Sequoia Capital. The recent funding infusion, the exact size of which was not disclosed, empowers EDX Markets to enhance its technology and expand its global footprint. The firm’s CEO, Jamil Nazarali, highlighted Singapore's strategic significance, citing its favorable environment for trading a diverse range of tokens and perpetual futures, along with its pool of financial talent. The platform has gained support from traditional finance heavyweights such as Charles Schwab and Miami International Holdings, alongside original backers Citadel Securities, Virtu Financial and Fidelity Investments' digital-asset arm. The recent funding round saw investors buying in at double the initial share prices from 2022. According to Paul Veradittakit, Managing Partner at Pantera Capital, EDX mirrors traditional market expectations, incorporating speed and capital efficiency while adapting to the unique features of the crypto landscape. Taking to the X social media platform, Veradittakit wrote:”We believe that EDX markets reduces counterparty risk for institutions through its non-custodial clearing model.” EDX Markets has witnessed noticeable trading volumes, with over $1.4 billion in notional volume traded in December alone. The company, headquartered in Hoboken, New Jersey, plans to build out its technology independently and transition away from its initial partnership with MEMX (Members Exchange). Singapore expansionThe expansion into Singapore involves seeking approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to operate an exchange offering both spot and perpetual futures trading. In December, EDX's clients traded more than $1.4 billion in notional volume. Following the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), EDX customers executed trades totaling more than $100 million in a single 24-hour period this month. While many in the sector welcome the involvement of TradFi in the crypto space, some have concerns with regard to how things play out over the longer term. Community member Joe Kerr took to social media on the subject, stating:”My concern is that they’ll use the ETFs to buy from public exchanges, custody with Coinbase but when shares sell, the Bitcoin is bought through EDX and locked behind an ‘institutions only’ firewall.”

Hong Kong Gives HKVAX Green Light for Virtual Asset TradingHong Kong’s financial landscape continues to develop, with the latest installment coming from a Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) decision to grant in-principle approval to Hong Kong Virtual Asset Exchange (HKVAX) to operate a virtual asset trading platform within the bounds of the region’s securities laws.The development, announced via a press release published to HKVAX’s website on Friday, follows the recent introduction of crypto retail trading by exchanges HashKey and OSL in Hong Kong.Photo by Dids on PexelsLicensed to extend service offeringIn a notable move, the SFC has green-lit HKVAX’s entry into the virtual asset trading arena. The approval-in-principle, announced on Friday, empowers HKVAX to conduct regulated activities of both Type 1 and Type 7. A Type 1 license permits the operation of a digital asset trading platform specializing in securities. Meanwhile, the Type 7 classification endows the company with the official capacity to deliver automated trading services to both retail users and institutional investors.Upon obtaining the final green light, the platform envisions providing an array of services, including over-the-counter (OTC) brokerage enabling seamless fiat-to-digital asset trading, an institutional-grade exchange platform, and a secure custody solution fortified by insurance coverage.HKVAX is poised to introduce an up-and-coming product category, security token offerings (STOs), seeking to harness the burgeoning investment prospects of the Web3 ecosystem. STOs involve offering security tokens which represent traditional legal ownership of real-world assets.Upcoming collaborative fundingAnthony Ng, the Co-Founder and CEO of HKVAX, affirmed the exchange’s growth trajectory and outlined plans for expansion of its product suite in Hong Kong. Ng also emphasized forging collaborations with strategic investors to fuel the exchange’s upcoming funding rounds.HKVAX’s announcement is emblematic of Hong Kong’s embrace of crypto retail trading. Recent entrants HashKey and OSL have set the precedent by becoming the first exchanges to secure licenses for offering crypto trading services in the region as of August 3.It’s been a long process for HKVAX to arrive at this point. The firm first contacted the SFC in 2018 in relation to licensing. It started the application process in 2019. It’s also proving to be an incredibly costly exercise. It’s believed that crypto-related operating licenses are costing firms up to $20 million.The backdrop to these developments is Hong Kong regulators’ proactive stance on crypto regulation, catalyzed by the FTX exchange collapse in 2022. CEO Julia Leung Fung-yee of the SFC, in a speech on June 24, highlighted the integral role of crypto trading in the virtual asset ecosystem, underscoring the importance of safeguarding investors through the new licensing framework for virtual asset service providers.In a financial landscape undergoing transformation, Hong Kong’s regulatory moves are poised to shape the future trajectory of virtual asset trading and its integration within the broader securities landscape. As HKVAX gains its foothold and the crypto industry matures, the coming months are expected to see further refinements in this nascent yet rapidly evolving market.

DeFiance Capital Secures Interim Victory in Dispute With 3ACSingapore’s DeFiance Capital, a Web3 and crypto investment firm, has notched up a small triumph in its ongoing $140 million legal clash with failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on UnsplashFavorable rulingAccording to a statement provided via a Medium blog post by DeFiance Capital Founder and CEO Arthur Cheong on Tuesday, the High Court of Singapore has delivered a favorable ruling for the firm, endorsing its preference for jurisdiction in Singapore, rather than the British Virgin Islands, which had been advocated by 3AC.The tussle between 3AC and DeFiance Capital centers around the ownership of certain assets. The liquidators appointed by the British Virgin Islands Court, from Teneo, assert that these assets essentially belong to 3AC’s creditors. However, DeFiance Capital argues vehemently that these assets must be partitioned and returned to its stakeholders.Struggle over assets and jurisdictionAt the heart of the matter are assets totaling $115 million, encompassing digital currencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which currently remain under the control of DeFiance Capital. Additionally, there are 69 SAFE (simple agreement for future equity)/SAFT (simple agreement for future tokens) agreements linked to 3AC. Although Teneo places the collective worth of these assets at roughly $141 million, DeFiance Capital’s estimation is more conservative, pegging it at around $120 million.Beyond asset ownership, jurisdiction has become a pivotal point of contention in the legal discourse. DeFiance Capital has steadfastly advocated for legal proceedings to take place in Singapore, where it operates, as opposed to the British Virgin Islands. The recent ruling from the High Court of Singapore lends support to this stance, challenging Teneo’s argument.DeFiance articulated its position, asserting: “Our position was that all the important witnesses and documents are in Singapore and the dispute ought to be heard by the Singapore Courts to ensure all relevant evidence would be available.”With the court’s decision aligning with DeFiance’s jurisdictional preference, the firm hopes that this development will pave the way for more substantive engagement between the parties, rather than being embroiled in procedural wrangling. The firm believes that this will allow the focus to shift towards addressing the core issues at hand.Business riftThe genesis of this legal saga dates back to 2020 when DeFiance was established as part of the 3AC group, operating autonomously under the stewardship of its founder, Arthur Cheong. The rift escalated in February 2022, when Cheong declined 3AC’s proposal to relocate to Dubai, eventually leading to the formation of two Singapore-based firms in May of that year.Furthermore, in the same month, DeFiance extended a loan of $35 million worth of USDC to 3AC, effectively becoming a creditor. Complications arose when 3AC’s founders transferred legal rights related to DeFiance Capital, a transaction that remained incomplete as 3AC filed for bankruptcy.In light of the ongoing dispute, 3AC asserted that DeFiance’s assets should be harnessed to settle its debts. However, DeFiance firmly stood its ground, upholding its ownership claims over the assets.With liquidators advocating for resolution in the British Virgin Islands — a move that DeFiance rejected due to its Singaporean management ties with 3AC — the stage was set for the legal clash that has now taken a notable turn with this recent court ruling.