AliExpress Partners With ‘The Moment3!’ NFT Project

US Treasury Sanctions Gaza-Based Crypto OperatorThe Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury has imposed sanctions on a crypto operator allegedly linked to the Palestinian militant group Hamas.The move by OFAC comes as a result of greater scrutiny of terrorist financing following an attack by Hamas on Israel in early October, in which a number of Israelis lost their lives.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on Pexels“Buy Cash Money and Money Transfer Company”The entity targeted by these sanctions is a Gaza-based virtual currency exchange known as the “Buy Cash Money and Money Transfer Company.” It is operated by Khan Yunis, a resident of Gaza. According to the Treasury Department, both the exchange and Khan Yunis are alleged to have ties to Hamas. Ahmed M.M. Alaqad, the owner of the business, has also been named in the sanctions.The primary objective of these sanctions, as stated by the Treasury Department, is to disrupt the sources of revenue for Hamas. The attack on Israel served as a trigger for these actions. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen emphasized the determination to prevent Hamas from raising funds for further acts of terror and violence against the people of Israel.This includes imposing sanctions and cooperating with international allies and partners to identify, freeze, and seize any assets related to Hamas in their respective jurisdictions. Yellen stated:“The United States is taking swift and decisive action to target Hamas’s financiers and facilitators following its brutal and unconscionable massacre of Israeli civilians, including children.”Crypto sector riskIt’s not the first time that crypto platforms have been implicated where terrorist financing is concerned. Earlier this year it emerged that Bitfinex Turkiye, the Turkish local exchange business of global crypto platform Bitfinex, was alleged to have been used for the purposes of money laundering by Hamas. Additionally, leading crypto platform Binance has found itself facing similar allegations.In the immediate aftermath of the recent attack, Israeli authorities moved to close down accounts they claimed were linked with Hamas on crypto platforms like Binance and elsewhere. The Israelis have continued where they left off in this respect, with a report emerging earlier this week that over one hundred accounts on Binance have been ordered to be shut down, with a further two hundred accounts facing scrutiny.While crypto may not account for a sizable proportion of terrorist financing means, these events open up a point of attack for those who oppose the further roll-out of decentralized money and systems.Fighting illicit finance through sanctionsNotably, the US Treasury has been employing sanctions as a tool to cut off financial support to entities suspected of being involved in terrorism or other illicit activities. In a similar vein, earlier in October, the Treasury announced sanctions against crypto wallets associated with Chinese chemical manufacturers, concurrently with an indictment from the Department of Justice related to the production of the drug fentanyl.Earlier this year, blockchain analytics firm Elliptic indicated that most Chinese suppliers of fentanyl precursors were accepting payments for the illicit material in cryptocurrency.It’s worth mentioning that this move by OFAC not only targets Hamas but also includes other entities allegedly connected to the Buy Cash Money and Money Transfer Company, including an al-Qaeda affiliate and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

The Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), the regulatory body which oversees the digital assets market within the emirate of Dubai in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), has taken corrective action against seven unlicensed crypto entities. Fines issuedAccording to an enforcement notice, published to the VARA website on October 8, the agency issued fines relative to a number of firms that it found were engaging in unlicensed virtual asset-related trading activity. The fines ranged from between 50,000 to 100,000 UAE dirhams (AED), equivalent to between $13,600 and $27,200 in U.S. dollars. The agency outlined that it was taking this corrective action in order to continue its enforcement efforts so as to safeguard Dubai’s virtual asset ecosystem. In its enforcement notice, the regulator did not disclose the names of the entities that have been sanctioned. The agency said that its investigations are ongoing, in partnership with local law enforcement.  A statement from the Regulatory Affairs and Enforcement division within VARA was provided, stating: “VARA will not tolerate any attempts to operate without appropriate licenses, nor will we allow unauthorized marketing of virtual asset activities. Our marketing regulations further emphasize Dubai’s commitment to ensuring transparency and always protecting stakeholder interests.”Photo by Alex Block on UnsplashCease and desist ordersIn addition to fines, VARA also issued the seven firms with cease and desist orders for breaching marketing regulations. Marketing by crypto firms is an area the regulator has been focusing on recently. Last month, VARA published a press release, outlining that it had updated its crypto regulations to specifically deal with marketing-related matters. Alongside that update, it issued a guidance document, clarifying the responsibilities of virtual asset service providers (VASPs) relative to marketing practices. A schedule of fines was provided in the case of a breach of the regulations, while the update set out a need for a mandatory disclaimer on marketing material to indicate that virtual assets are volatile and may lose their value, fully or partially. The Dubai regulator is not the first to home in on the marketing activities of crypto businesses. In the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) enforced additional rules related to crypto marketing in late 2023. Some crypto businesses found the requirements too arduous and left the UK market as a direct consequence. Public warningIn its enforcement notice, the Dubai regulator also had a message for the trading and investing public, stating: “This public warning is VARA’s market notice to all to avoid engaging with any unlicensed firms.” The regulator added that interacting with unlicensed entities exposes both individual investors and institutions to both financial and reputational risk.  Furthermore, it warned of “potential legal consequences” for regulatory violations. “Only firms licensed by VARA are authorised to provide virtual asset services in/from Dubai, and the Authority remains steadfast in its commitment to protect consumers and investors, and to preserve market integrity,” the regulator further asserted. 

Hong Kong Adapts Crypto Regulations to Broaden Market AccessHong Kong’s financial regulator has taken a further regulatory step in its evolving stance on cryptocurrency trading, widening the scope of retail access to digital assets through intermediaries.Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashResponding to growing demandThe move follows a surge in interest in spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and recent investigations into the unlicensed operations of the JPEX exchange. In a circular published by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) on Friday, the regulator explained that the policy shift was prompted by changing market dynamics and growing inquiries from the industry.The new guidelines aim to extend access to a broader clientele and facilitate the direct deposit and withdrawal of virtual assets through intermediaries, all while maintaining stringent safeguards. The circular states:”The policy is updated in light of the latest market developments and enquiries from the industry seeking to further expand retail access through intermediaries and to allow investors to directly deposit and withdraw virtual assets to/from intermediaries with appropriate safeguards.”Cautionary notesDespite this welcome expansion, there are a couple of cautionary notes included within the circular. Hong Kong remains circumspect about overseas virtual asset (VA) products, deeming them “complex” and, as a result, riskier. The circular emphasizes that “VA-related products considered complex should only be offered to professional investors.” For instance, an overseas VA non-derivative ETF is likely to fall into this category.The other condition pertains to potential clients, who will be required to undergo a one-off test to assess their knowledge of investing and ensure they possess the financial wherewithal to manage the risks associated with virtual asset trading. Furthermore, intermediaries must furnish clients with comprehensive risk disclosure statements.The regulator also places an onus on the intermediary to set a limit for each retail client, to ensure that a retail client’s exposure to virtual assets is reasonable. The circular outlines that deposit and withdrawal of client funds should only happen through the use of segregated funding accounts on an SFC-licensed platform.Crypto sector aspirationsThis shift in regulation underscores Hong Kong’s ongoing aspirations to solidify its position as a hub for virtual assets. The territory embarked on a new regulatory regime in June, enabling applications for crypto trading platform licenses. By August, the first batch of licenses was granted, allowing exchanges to cater to retail customers. This marked a notable turnaround from Hong Kong’s prior 18 months of skepticism and hostility toward the cryptocurrency sector.The timing of these regulatory changes coincides with surging interest in spot Bitcoin ETFs, with JPMorgan even suggesting that approval in the US could materialize within months. This shift in regulatory perspective in Hong Kong also follows the investigation and accusations made against the JPEX exchange for conducting unlicensed operations, leading to arrests and the promise to disclose details of licensed applicants. The JPEX scandal has also dampened public confidence in crypto in Hong Kong more recently.Hong Kong is adapting its crypto regulations to be more inclusive while maintaining a cautious approach toward complex overseas virtual asset products. This regulatory shift underscores the region’s determination to foster its status as a leading hub for virtual assets, following a change of heart from its previous stance of skepticism and reluctance towards the crypto industry.