Korea Bolsters Crypto Oversight and Anti-Fraud Efforts

Crypto.com, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange and digital asset brokerage, announced that it introduced an institutional trading platform in the United States. In a statement published on its website on Jan. 21, the company outlined that U.S. institutional and advanced traders can now access the new platform. The firm believes that the offering complements its retail-facing Crypto.com app., which currently serves the U.S. market.Photo by Joshua Hoehne on Unsplash480 trading pairsThe institutional-grade platform will enable access to over 300 cryptocurrencies and 480 trading pairs. The product is likely to appeal to a similar market segment as those clients targeted by the Crypto.com Custody Trust Company, a digital asset custodian, which was established last month. At that time, Crypto.com co-founder and CEO Kris Marszalek said that launching the digital asset custodian was the latest step on the company’s product roadmap, with a view towards building a business and a market presence within the U.S. and Canada.  Responding to this latest product offering, Marszalek stated: “We took the time to build the best possible product for institutional and advanced users around the world and we are now incredibly excited to fully introduce it in the market we continue to be bullish about – the U.S.” Marszalek added that Crypto.com has invested heavily in the exchange’s technological capabilities and banking rails. The Crypto.com CEO believes that this investment has resulted in exponential global growth for the company, with the platform becoming a leading U.S. dollar-supporting exchange. Regulatory tailwindsCrypto.com’s bullishness regarding the U.S. market currently stands in contrast with developments in June 2023 when the company decided to shut down its institutional exchange offering, citing limited demand amid a bleak market landscape for crypto in the United States.  At the time, the company was one of several to look towards opportunities outside of the U.S. Shortly afterwards, Crypto.com obtained a crypto trading license in Dubai. Competitors Gemini and Coinbase followed a similar strategy, looking at growth opportunities in the Middle East and Asia. It’s clear that a regulatory crackdown in the U.S. at that time curbed the expansion plans of many cryptocurrency platforms. Many industry experts are of the belief that there will be a pro-crypto Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the U.S. as part of the newly seated Trump administration.  Regulatory clarity is necessary for institutional involvement in the digital assets sector. Last week, Mark Uyeda, Acting Chairman of the SEC, announced the formation of a crypto task force with the objective of creating a clear regulatory framework for crypto. The U.S. is home to the world’s largest capital markets. A report produced by New York-headquartered blockchain analysis firm Chainalysis late last year identified that 70% of North American crypto transactions involved transfers that had a value in excess of $1 million, pointing to the level of institutional activity within that market.  Earlier this month, Crypto.com added the ability for U.S. platform users to trade stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

CityLabs Secures 8.55% Stake in GopaxCityLabs, a company listed on the KOSDAQ stock exchange, has stepped in as a rescue investor for the South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Gopax.The company announced last Friday that it has acquired a total of 76,308 shares of Streami, the operator of Gopax, securing an 8.55% stake in the company. The investment amounts to a total value of KRW 5.4 billion (approximately $4 million).Photo by Precondo CA on UnsplashGopax’s turbulent historyGopax has recently been facing public and regulatory scrutiny due to its internal struggles, such as undergoing major changes in leadership earlier this year following its acquisition by Binance, with Lee Jun-haeng resigning and Binance’s Asia Pacific Head, Leon Sing Foong, taking over.After this event, Streami submitted reports to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission (FSS) in line with requirements to inform the regulatory body about such changes. However, due to delays in the FIU’s approval process likely influenced by Binance’s various legal and regulatory challenges, there was yet another leadership transition — Foong stepped down, and Lee Joong-hoon, Gopax’s former Vice President, took over. Notably, Foong recently left Binance altogether amid regulatory crackdowns.During this process, Gopax also struggled to make principal and interest payments on its own decentralized finance (DeFi) service, GOFi, in the wake of last year’s FTX collapse. The amount of customer funds locked in GOFi totals KRW 56.6 billion, according to an announcement made by Gopax in April. Binance acquired a stake in Gopax on the condition that it would inject enough capital into Gopax to repay this amount in full.CityLabs steps inAs a result, there have been speculations that a Korean company would invest in Gopax and deliver the exchange from its woes. Some even predicted that this company might become a major shareholder, although CityLabs has acquired only an 8.55% stake due to the fact that the funds required to do so far exceed CityLabs’ annual revenue.Last year, CityLabs reported a consolidated revenue of KRW 28.4 billion and an operating loss of KRW 6.1 billion. Although its revenue increased by 2% compared to the previous year, operating losses grew by 46.9%. While the company may not have sufficient funds at present to become a major shareholder, there lies the possibility that it may increase its stake in the future.The acquisition seems to be driven by CityLabs’ interest in blockchain businesses and the crypto market. While it currently specializes in intelligent transportation systems (ITS), it was formerly Dayli Blockchain, which was affiliated with the crypto exchange Coinone and Dayli Financial Group (now known as Gowid). In 2017, Yellow Mobile became the largest shareholder of Dayli Financial, and in February 2018, it became the largest shareholder of DailyBlockchain, making Dayli Blockchain its subsidiary. Coinone was also a subsidiary of Yellow Mobile at the time. All of these ownership relations have now been restructured.CityLabs has thus been involved in the blockchain industry for some time now with previous connections to cryptocurrency exchanges while also offering decentralized identity (DID) and blockchain as a service (BaaS) products. Observations point to the possibility that its history has influenced its decision to invest in Gopax.“We acquired shares to secure an entry point into the crypto market and position ourselves as a major player,” the company said in a statement.Meanwhile, financial authorities are considering plans to examine the eligibility of major shareholders when reviewing applications from crypto businesses.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the city-state’s central bank and primary financial regulator, has set a deadline of June 30 for unlicensed digital token service providers (DTSPs) working out of Singapore to cease offering their services to clients in overseas markets.Photo by Hu Chen on UnsplashResponding to feedbackThe deadline emerged by way of a process MAS has followed as part of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022 (FSM Act). Last October, the regulator invited feedback from stakeholders related to the authority’s approach to the regulation of DTSPs. MAS published its response to that feedback on May 30.  It stated:”DTSPs which are subject to a licensing requirement under section 137 of the FSM Act must suspend or cease carrying on a business of providing DT services outside Singapore by 30 June 2025.” It added that it was not including any transitional arrangement for DTSPs despite MAS receiving such a suggestion from a number of feedback respondents. Instead, unlicensed DTSPs will need to abide by the June 30 deadline and have acquired a license by then or cease unlicensed activity.The regulator defines DTSPs as individuals, partnerships or Singapore corporations operating from a place of business in Singapore, including those formed or incorporated in Singapore who offer digital token services outside Singapore. Those found in breach of the regulation could face up to three years in prison and fines of up to S$250,000 ($195,000). Companies who have already obtained licensing or those exempted by way of the Securities and Futures Act, Payment Services Act and the Financial Advisers Act are free to continue trading. Challenging licensing requirementsThose who wish to become compliant will have to satisfy some challenging requirements. For those granted a license, an annual license fee of S$10,000 ($7,780) applies. Small-scale DTSPs need to satisfy a $150,000 ($116,670) ongoing capital requirement, while larger, well-established DTSPs must comply with a S$250,000 ($195,000) capital requirement. Additionally, MAS has put in place competency requirements related to a DTSP's CEO, directors, partners and managers. Hagen Rooke, a partner at law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, outlined on LinkedIn that while it's possible for unlicensed operators to obtain licensing, it will be very difficult to get a license. In its feedback response document, the regulator stated: “MAS will approach the licensing of DTSPs in a prudent and cautious manner and there will be extremely limited circumstances under which MAS will consider granting an applicant a licence under section 138 of the FSM Act.” Rooke advised crypto companies that may be affected to act swiftly in order to derisk through an operational restructuring or removing the businesses' Singapore touchpoints. He suggested that firms need to consider if it has customers outside of Singapore or front-office functions located outside of the city-state to determine if they could be affected by this regulatory measure. A number of Asian countries have moved to take action against unlicensed foreign firms that have engaged with local investors, with Thailand becoming the latest country to do so recently. However, the Singaporean authorities have approached the issue from the opposite perspective, citing the potential reputational risk that unlicensed DTSPs pose for Singapore.