Top

BOK Staffers Assess Crypto Market Vulnerabilities and Their Implications

Policy & Regulation·May 19, 2023, 2:24 AM

On Thursday, the Bank of Korea’s (BOK) staff members published an assessment of the vulnerabilities in the cryptocurrency market and their potential implications. Here is the summary of the report.

Photo by D Tan on Unsplash

 

2022 crypto winter

Throughout 2022, the worldwide crypto market faced a series of adverse occurrences, such as significant drops in the prices of major crypto-assets and the collapse of prominent crypto companies. These events shed light on the vulnerabilities that had accumulated during the rapid growth of the market.

The first major event occurred in May 2022 when the algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD experienced a sharp decline, resulting in substantial losses and bankruptcies for numerous retail investors and crypto firms. This incident significantly eroded confidence in the overall crypto market. The subsequent bankruptcies of prominent crypto lender Celsius and hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) further highlighted the realization of risks commonly associated with traditional financial markets, such as multiple collateral loans and maturity and liquidity mismatches, within the crypto market.

In November 2022, the well-known crypto exchange FTX filed for bankruptcy, demonstrating that the activities of a large crypto company can propagate risks through moral hazard and excessive profit-seeking behavior when it operates outside the realm of regulatory oversight.

 

Similarities with TradFi

These negative events that unfolded in the global crypto market in 2022 share similarities with issues previously observed in financial markets, such as unsustainable business models, liquidity risk, leverage, and lack of transparency in financial conditions. These parallels suggest that if the crypto markets were subjected to comparable levels of regulation as traditional financial markets, it is plausible that the triggering of these risks could have been avoided altogether, or at the very least, the resulting damage could have been mitigated to some extent.

 

Implications for the Korean market

At present, it is deemed unlikely that events akin to those witnessed in overseas crypto markets will transpire in the Korean market. The Korean crypto-asset market has primarily evolved through exchanges, with limited influence from other enterprises such as crypto issuers and decentralized lending platforms. In addition, Korean crypto exchanges are subject to regulation under the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information. This mandates the separation of customer deposits from exchange assets and the strict management of custodial crypto-assets through secure wallets. Additionally, Korean exchanges are prohibited from listing their own tokens on their platforms.

However, there remains a dearth of information regarding the business structures of crypto companies that offer services similar to those in the traditional financial industry. This lack of information poses challenges in accurately assessing risk and providing adequate investor protection. Meanwhile, there is a potential for a deeper integration between the crypto market and users’ daily lives, particularly through major technology companies, gaming companies, and security tokens.

 

Suggestions

It is vital to ensure that crypto-assets are regulated based on the principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” through the ongoing development of crypto-asset-related legislation. The Financial Stability Board, an international body monitoring the global financial system, explained this principle in a 2022 paper: “Where crypto-assets and intermediaries perform an equivalent economic function to one performed by instruments and intermediaries of the traditional financial sector, they should be subject to equivalent regulation.”

Additionally, it is necessary to stay aligned with major countries in terms of the speed and comprehensiveness of regulatory measures to prevent regulatory discrepancies across borders due to the global nature of crypto risks.

Enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of regulation requires the establishment and maintenance of a close cooperation system between authorities. This collaborative effort should encompass various aspects, including monitoring, information gathering, and supervision of the crypto-asset market. Notably, the widespread adoption of stablecoins can affect the stability of the overall financial system, including monetary systems and payment and settlement systems. Hence, it is necessary to strengthen the involvement of central banks in the monitoring and supervision framework for crypto-assets, including stablecoins, as demonstrated by legislative approaches adopted by major economies like the EU. Furthermore, imposing disclosure requirements, external audits, and documentation submission obligations on crypto-asset operators is advisable.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 29, 2023

Illicit Crypto Activities Estimated to Have Surpassed $100 Billion in S.E. Asia

Illicit Crypto Activities Estimated to Have Surpassed $100 Billion in S.E. AsiaA recent analysis by blockchain analytics firm Bitrace has found that over $100 billion worth of digital currency has been used in illicit crypto trading activities in Southeast Asia.Photo by Bermix Studio on UnsplashThe firm provided details of its analysis via X (formerly Twitter) on Monday. The data underscores the extensive scope of unlawful activities involving cryptocurrencies across Southeast Asia. The analysis further revealed that illicit activities involve fraudulent schemes, online gambling, and money laundering.Misuse of digital asset innovationSome of the key characteristics of digital assets include the ability to maintain anonymity, decentralization, and borderless transactions, which are generally considered positive attributes. However, the very nature of decentralized cryptocurrency means that nobody dictates who uses it or the purpose for which someone decides to use it. With that, these characteristics have rendered illegal undertakings not only more covert but also facilitated expedited transfers of pilfered resources.The silver lining, however, rests in the inherent transparency of blockchain ledgers. This quality has enabled Bitrace’s team of encryption analysts to trace funds implicated in illicit ventures through intensive on-chain analysis.Key insightsThe Bitrace research points towards the following key insights:Prevalence of Tether (USDT): The use of USDT has gained prominence in both illicit activities and gambling operations throughout Southeast Asia, with a staggering sum of over 115 billion USDT recorded in 2022 alone.Shift to Top Trading Platforms: USDT is observed to migrate from unlawful platforms within Southeast Asia towards top-tier trading platforms. Particularly favored by operators and gamblers, a significant proportion hails from the Chinese demographic, consistently gravitating towards specific exchanges.Inflow into Trading Platforms: A noteworthy development emerges as over 14.6 billion USDT prepares to traverse into trading platform accounts. The mounting risk factor diffuses across an expanding spectrum of addresses and platforms.Likely consequencesIf this blockchain analysis is found to be accurate, there are likely to be ramifications for all projects operating in the digital assets, DeFi and Web3 space. It comes at a time when the focus on the regulation of crypto-related businesses is more intense than ever before.Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Transaction (KYT) legislation are cornerstone financial services regulations that have been established on a global basis. If these regulations are being flouted, and crypto is being used as a means to circumvent them, there’s a real risk that regulation could be applied heavy-handedly to counteract that threat of widespread illicit activity.Global crypto exchange Binance has faced criticism in this context, with a suggestion in March that its Turkey-based exchange service had been used by an organization connected with militant group Hamas for money laundering and terrorist financing.In a report last week, Binance claimed that it shared information with authorities that led to the capture of senior ISIS members. More such cooperation will likely be necessary to prevent the sector being subject to overzealous regulation.

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 24, 2024

Hong Kong privacy watchdog halts Worldcoin operations

Hong Kong's Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) has issued a directive for the Worldcoin Foundation to cease its operations within the region, citing violations of local privacy laws. The decision comes after the PCPD found that Worldcoin had improperly collected facial and iris data from approximately 8,302 individuals. The agency’s investigation included ten covert visits to six different Worldcoin locations between December 2023 and January 2024. According to the PCPD, the extent of data collection by Worldcoin was deemed "unnecessary and excessive" failing to adhere to the Data Protection Principles.Photo by Claudio Schwarz on UnsplashConcerns over data retentionThe privacy watchdog criticized Worldcoin for its intention to retain personal data for up to 10 years. This retention period was intended for training AI models for user verification processes but was judged by the PCPD to be excessively long, amounting to prolonged retention of personal data. Following the findings, the PCPD has issued an enforcement notice to Worldcoin, mandating the cessation of all its activities in Hong Kong. Privacy Commissioner Ada Chung has called on the public to report any ongoing operations by Worldcoin in the city. In response to growing international scrutiny, Worldcoin announced in March that it would halt the collection of personal data and is planning to introduce a new feature titled "Personal Custody," which would purportedly allow users to store their data on their devices. This change comes as Worldcoin faces additional challenges in other jurisdictions, including Spain and Portugal, which have also expressed concerns over the project's data collection practices. The project was also scrutinized in South Korea but it recently resumed services. As of now, Worldcoin has not provided comments regarding the recent regulatory actions. 

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jul 04, 2023

Singapore Looks to Prohibit Crypto Lending and Staking

Singapore Looks to Prohibit Crypto Lending and StakingIn a move to bolster investor protection and maintain financial stability, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is introducing new guidelines for cryptocurrency platforms operating in the country.Details of the measures were published by MAS on Monday. According to its statement, the measures “will mitigate the risk of loss or misuse of customers’ assets, and facilitate the recovery of customers’ assets in the event of a DPT [Digital Payment Token] service provider’s insolvency.”The proposed guidelines outline several key measures. One such measure is the daily reconciliation of customer assets, which will help prevent discrepancies and safeguard against potential losses.Photo by Hu Chen on UnsplashHolding assets in trustAdditionally, the custody function, responsible for holding and safeguarding client assets, will be operationally separated from other business divisions to minimize the risk of mismanagement or unauthorized use. By the end of this year, it’s understood that crypto platforms will be required to store client assets in trust accounts, ensuring enhanced security and accountability.DisclosuresFurthermore, licensed cryptocurrency service providers will be mandated to provide explicit disclosures to customers, clearly outlining the risks associated with holding and trading digital payment tokens (DPTs). Recognizing the speculative nature of digital token trading, the MAS acknowledges that regulations alone cannot fully protect consumers from potential losses.To further protect retail investors, the MAS intends to prohibit cryptocurrency service providers from facilitating lending or staking activities. Lending and staking, where digital tokens are loaned or pledged to earn profits, are considered unsuitable for the general public due to their complex and high-risk nature.These measures come as part of Singapore’s efforts to strengthen its regulatory environment for digital assets. The consultation process began last year, following the collapse of FTX, a cryptocurrency exchange.Singaporeans suffered disproportionately with the collapse of FTX as previously, MAS had banned global crypto exchange Binance from operating within the city-state. That led to Singapore having more FTX customers than many other world regions. To compound matters, state-owned global investment firm Temasek, was an investor in the fraudulent crypto exchange.MAS had called for feedback and proposals, with a focus on enhancing investor safeguards and promoting responsible trading practices. While the regulations aim to provide a safer environment for investors, the MAS also emphasizes the importance of individuals exercising caution when engaging in digital token trading.Contrasting approachesWhile Singapore is taking steps to tighten regulations, other cities like Hong Kong are adopting a more inclusive approach to the crypto industry. Hong Kong Legislative Council member Johnny Ng has voiced support for the local crypto business and has encouraged prominent exchanges like Coinbase to establish operations in the territory, aiming to foster greater engagement and growth within the sector.As the crypto industry continues to evolve, regulatory frameworks play a crucial role in ensuring investor protection and maintaining market integrity. Singapore’s proactive approach to strengthening its regulatory environment reflects its commitment to striking a balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding the interests of investors.

news
Loading