Korean health management app leverages blockchain for iris-based solutions

Local crypto firms in Hong Kong are understood to be in “active” talks with the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), with a view towards bringing about the integration of staking within crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) products. Haiyang Ru, chief risk officer of HashKey Group, a leading Hong Kong-headquartered digital asset financial services firm, told The Block that the Chinese autonomous territory may shortly see the introduction of staking services relative to crypto derivatives trading products and crypto ETFs. He stated: "We are actively discussing with the SFC the introduction of ETF staking and tokenized money market funds, as well as launching an 'Earn' feature alongside spot trading."Photo by tommao wang on UnsplashFocus on staking in 2025HashKey is one of a number of well-known digital asset firms that is in regular contact with the regulator. Other firms are also paying attention to developments. Alessio Quaglini, co-founder and CEO of Hex Trust, a Hong Kong-based firm that offers regulated institutional digital asset custody and staking services, believes that staking will garner greater attention in 2025. He stated: “Institutions that move into crypto custody will naturally seek yield-generating opportunities for their clients."  OSL, one of the first entities alongside HashKey to be awarded digital assets-related licensing in Hong Kong, has also identified rising customer demand for yield-generating products in the crypto space within the Chinese autonomous territory.  Global competitionThe authorities in Hong Kong are likely to be watching developments overseas also. ETH ETFs in the United States have reeled in $3 billion in capital inflows without staking. Since the launch of these products, many industry commentators have suggested that in the event that staking is approved, big institutions, particularly pension funds and wealth managers, are going to be attracted to the passive yields on these ETFs.  Traditional finance (TradFi) loves yield, and in the case of Ether ETFs that include staking, an annual percentage yield (APY) of up to 5% should be possible. Last month, an S&P Global report suggested that there was growing interest from institutional investors with regard to crypto staking opportunities.  Cryptocurrency ETF issuer 21Shares has applied to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the U.S. to include staking within its ETH ETF product. A similar application has been made by crypto asset manager Grayscale relative to its ETH ETF offering. With that activity ongoing in the U.S. and inter-jurisdictional competition in terms of digital asset growth opportunities, it’s likely that Hong Kong will be keen to enable this market offering. Staking ‘unparalleled’ in TradFi markets Earlier this week, the SFC introduced a new roadmap geared towards strengthening the digital assets sector in Hong Kong. One of the initiatives itemized is the enabling of crypto staking.  The explanatory document published by the regulator states that it is examining the introduction of staking with safeguards in respect to digital asset custody, liquidity risks and “ensuring that the operational processes for staking are transparent.” The SFC described crypto staking as a yield generation opportunity that is unparalleled in TradFi markets.

Chinese Court Recognizes Virtual Assets as Legal PropertyAccording to a recent report published by the People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China, a Chinese court has recognized the legal status of virtual assets, having analyzed their attributes within the framework of Chinese criminal law.The court unequivocally stated that virtual assets are considered legal property under the current legal policy framework and are thus protected by law.The People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China exercise judicial power independently, free from interference by administrative or public organizations. They have responsibility for adjudicating civil, criminal, and administrative cases.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashProperty classificationLocal news source Odaily News reported on the development on Friday, indicating that the report, titled “Identification of the Property Attributes of Virtual Currency and Disposal of Property Involved in the Case,” explicitly recognized the economic attributes of virtual assets, leading to their classification as property.This declaration is particularly significant in light of China’s sweeping ban on decentralized cryptocurrencies. Despite this ban, the report argues that virtual assets held by individuals should enjoy legal protection within the existing policy framework.Furthermore, the report proposed recommendations for addressing crimes involving virtual assets. It emphasized that in cases where money and property are involved, confiscation should be based on the integration of criminal and civil law. The approach taken aims to strike a balance between safeguarding personal property rights while also addressing broader social and public interests.Contentious approach to cryptoWhile China has been making every effort to promote its central bank digital currency (CBDC) and the development of blockchain and metaverse-related technology within the country, its stance on decentralized cryptocurrencies has been contentious at best.Its approach in that respect has been marked by a blanket ban on crypto-related activities such as mining and trading and the prohibition of foreign crypto exchanges from serving customers within mainland China. Nevertheless, Chinese courts have consistently taken a more nuanced view without necessarily contradicting the government’s approach.Differing interpretationsThe divergence between national policy and court rulings first emerged in 2019 when the Hangzhou Internet Court found that Bitcoin is a form of virtual property, and on that basis, it is safeguarded by the law from the point of view of property rights. In May 2022, a Shanghai court affirmed that Bitcoin qualifies as virtual property and, as such, falls under the purview of property rights.Global issueIt’s not just the Chinese courts that are grappling with the issue of clarifying property rights relative to virtual assets. In April of this year, a case in Hong Kong involving defunct crypto exchange Gatecoin resulted in the courts determining that cryptocurrency is property and that on that basis, it’s “capable of being held in trust.”In July a Singaporean court determined that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and on that basis, it should be recognized as property. Earlier this year, the High Court of Justice in London recognized non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as property.The report from the People’s Court reaffirms the legal status of virtual assets as protected property under Chinese law. This development highlights the ongoing divergence between China’s regulatory policy and the judicial interpretation of virtual assets, signaling a potential evolution in the country’s approach to cryptocurrencies.

Lawsuit Sees Further Chinese Crypto TV CoverageChina’s state broadcaster, CCTV, rarely covers the topic of crypto but in the space of the past three weeks, it has covered the subject twice, with the latest segment covering the news of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing a lawsuit against global crypto exchange, Binance.Photo by Paolo Chiabrando on UnsplashBad pressThe segment, which aired on CCTV, provided a brief overview of the lawsuit, stating that the SEC accused Binance, its Co-Founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ), and its American affiliate Binance.US of violating US securities laws. The report also noted that the prices of Bitcoin and Binance’s native BNB coin experienced a decline following the news.The lawsuit filed by the SEC received significant media attention due to Binance’s position as the world’s largest crypto exchange. The crypto industry in the US has been under increased scrutiny following the recent troubles faced by FTX, another major player in the market. Prosecutors have alleged that FTX engaged in fraudulent activities that harmed its users.Many blame US regulators who spent hundreds of hours with FTX executives working on projects, and US Capitol Hill politicians, 33% of whom received money from FTX, as being culpable for the FTX collapse. Despite this, it’s clear that the collapse is being leveraged to effect a clampdown on the digital assets sector.It is worth noting that the CCTV broadcast also made mention of a lawsuit filed by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) against Binance and CZ in March. This lawsuit, similar to the SEC’s, focused on the sale of crypto derivatives. It is unclear whether CCTV covered the CFTC lawsuit when it was initially filed.CCTV’s coverage of crypto-related news is rare, making this particular broadcast significant and garnering wider attention. The outcome of legal action taken by the SEC against Binance is being watched carefully as it will likely have implications for digital asset regulation going forward.Previous coverageIn a previous broadcast last month, CCTV aired a segment that featured cryptocurrencies, including the Bitcoin logo. Ironically, given the nature of this latest reporting, Binance’s CZ regarded that previous coverage as a noteworthy event. Historically, such coverage has often preceded bull runs in the crypto market. The segment showcased what appeared to be a Bitcoin ATM in Hong Kong, displaying a prominent blue Bitcoin logo and an option to “Buy Bitcoins.”NFTs were also highlighted in the segment. Many speculated that the coverage signified a softening of the stance of the Chinese authorities in relation to crypto. However, the video of the initial crypto segment was taken down from the broadcaster’s website shortly after CZ tweeted about it.Despite it not being the most positive of news, CCTV’s coverage of the Binance lawsuit and its previous segment on cryptocurrencies indicates a growing interest in the industry from mainstream media outlets. The attention from a state broadcaster like CCTV suggests that regulators and authorities in China are closely monitoring developments in the crypto space and considering their potential impact on the broader financial landscape.