Wemade to unveil upgraded DAO platform Wepublic in February

Korean Travel Rule Solution Provider Partners with ACAMS to Enhance AML MeasuresConnect Digital Exchanges (Code), the Korean Travel Rule solution provider, announced today that it has forged a partnership with the Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (ACAMS), the largest international membership organization of its kind.©Pexels/Savvas StavrinosTravel RuleThe Travel Rule, issued by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing, requires virtual asset service providers to screen the information of the senders and recipients of crypto transactions.Code’s collaboration with ACAMSCode will collaborate with ACAMS to develop more effective anti-money laundering (AML) measures in Korea by producing anti-financial crime experts, and enhancing Travel Rule regulations. ACAMS offers internationally recognized training programs, with more than 40,000 certified AML specialists in over 175 countries and regions.More about CodeCode was jointly established by Korea’s major crypto exchanges Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit in August 2021. Code recently published a report containing the Travel Rule operation results over the past year in Korea and its recommendations.

The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a civil complaint to seize roughly 127,271 Bitcoin linked to an alleged fraud scheme tied to Prince Group, a multinational conglomerate based in Cambodia. That’s according to a press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. The digital assets are currently valued at approximately $14.18 billion and are now in the custody of the U.S. government. Prince Group chairman Chen Zhi, now indicted by U.S. authorities, has been named as the mastermind behind the operation. FBI Assistant Director in Charge Christopher Raia said Chen oversaw an international crypto investment scam connected to a labor trafficking network that defrauded thousands of victims worldwide.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashOperations across 30 nationsSince 2015, Chen Zhi has headed the Prince Group, which operates in more than 30 countries. Under his direction, the group allegedly established scam compounds across Cambodia that promoted fraudulent crypto investment scams. The operations targeted victims through social media and messaging platforms with false promises of high returns. According to the allegations, funds were stolen and laundered rather than invested, and perpetrators often built trust over time before carrying out the fraud. Authorities in Vietnam have uncovered a comparable case that did not involve the seizure of cryptocurrency. According to Tech in Asia, Hanoi police confiscated assets worth $34 million from Nguyen Hoa Binh, chairman of the tech company NextTech. The seized property includes 597 gold bars, deeds to 18 properties, and two vehicles. Investigators allege that Binh and nine associates raised funds for the AntEx cryptocurrency project by selling 33.2 billion tokens to 30,000 investors in 2021, collecting around $4.5 million. The defendants are said to have taken part in fraudulent appropriation of assets and accounting violations. Tepid business climate in VietnamThese incidents come as Vietnam’s government works to define its stance on digital assets. According to a Cointelegraph report published earlier this month, the Vietnamese Ministry of Finance said that since the announcement of the country’s five-year digital asset trading pilot plan, no companies have applied to participate. Sharing this update, the vice minister of finance expressed hope that this pilot would launch before 2026. The report points to strict requirements as a likely reason for hesitation. Licensed crypto asset service providers must hold at least 10 trillion dong, about $379 million, in capital. They are also required to back all digital assets with real and tangible assets only, and the framework explicitly prohibits using fiat currencies or securities as backing. These rules leave few options that would attract retail or institutional investors. Gemini eyes Southeast Asia as adoption growsMeanwhile, global firms continue to look to Southeast Asia as activity increases. Dow Jones Newswires reported that Gemini, the American crypto platform founded by the Winklevoss brothers, plans to expand its footprint across the region. In an interview, Saad Ahmed, Gemini’s head of Asia Pacific (APAC), said the company was strengthening its regional operations. A Chainalysis study provides context, showing that the APAC region recorded the fastest growth in on-chain activity compared to other markets in the 12 months ended June. The region saw total crypto transactions rise to $2.36 trillion from $1.4 trillion a year earlier. Although Ahmed did not share investment figures, he said Gemini’s Singapore headquarters has grown to about 65 employees, up from 15 in the final quarter of 2023. He added that the expansion reflects the company’s view of Singapore as a key base for its operations in Asia and globally. Recent criminal discoveries and tightening regulations reveal how Southeast Asia’s crypto scene remains nascent. Governments are stepping up enforcement and shaping new frameworks even as global firms expand across the region, motivated by growing adoption. How policymakers and market players respond to these early tests will define the next phase of digital asset growth in Asia. 

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm MisrepresentationThe Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.Photo by Marcel Eberle on UnsplashBanking ordinance violationsIn a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.Misuse of banking termsAny entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.