RaonSecure showcases blockchain-based SaaS to student ID card association

Flybit’s Bug Bounty Program to Strengthen Its Crypto Exchange SecurityKorea Digital Exchange, the operator behind South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Flybit, announced the launch of a bug bounty program aimed at rewarding individuals who identify vulnerabilities in the trading platform’s security infrastructure.Photo by Sergi Kabrera by UnsplashWhite Hat Together initiativeThe inception of this bug bounty program was made possible through Flybit’s involvement in the White Hat Together initiative, which involves the active engagement of the government, enterprises, and citizens. This initiative is hosted by digital service company CJ OliveNetworks in collaboration with the Korea Internet and Security Agency (KISA) and bug bounty platform Find The Gap. Its objective is to reassess the security of Flybit’s services and proactively address weak points within the system.Flybit intends to seize this opportunity to enhance its information protection capabilities, with a commitment to safeguarding user assets and ensuring a reliable trading environment.Recognition for information protectionFlybit is the sole non-fiat crypto exchange in the country that has successfully attained Personal Information and Information Security Management System (ISMS-P) certification as well as ISO 27001 and ISO 27701 certifications. It’s important to note that, in Korea, crypto trading platforms are legally mandated to obtain real-name accounts from banks to facilitate the deposit and withdrawal services of Korean won. Platforms lacking real-name bank accounts are prohibited from supporting trading denominated in Korean won.Additionally, in May, Flybit participated in information protection disclosure and was subsequently certified by KISA as an outstanding company for its investments in information protection.

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.

Bill Winters, the American banker who heads the British financial group Standard Chartered, appeared at the Hong Kong FinTech Week conference earlier this week, where he predicted a future in which cash will give way to blockchain-based systems for everyday transactions. According to Cointelegraph, Winters’ view aligns with that of Hong Kong regulators. At the same time, he stressed the importance of continued experimentation, noting that it remains uncertain how this transformation will ultimately take shape. Winters also commended Hong Kong’s leadership in exploring the potential of digital finance. Tech-driven finance has certainly been one of the key initiatives Hong Kong has been exploring. Recently, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) released its e-HKD Pilot Programme Phase 2 Report, which showed public support for tokenized deposits.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashReal-world assets gain ground on the blockchainOn-chain data also underscores the rapid growth of the tokenization sector. According to RWA.xyz, the total value of real-world assets (RWAs) deployed on-chain has climbed to $35.63 billion, up 7.8% from a month ago. A study by Ripple and Boston Consulting Group (BCG) estimates that tokenized assets could be worth $19 trillion by 2033, about 530 times their current value. Among RWA assets, the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity (BUIDL) Fund, Tether Gold (XAUT), and Paxos Gold (PAXG) currently lead the market in terms of value. Over the past 30 days, BlackRock’s BUIDL Fund slipped 0.06%, while the two tokenized gold products, XAUT and PAXG, jumped 46.65% and 14.19%, respectively. These gains mirror gold’s bullish run in October, when its price surpassed $4,000 per ounce for the first time on Oct. 7. The momentum has since eased slightly, with gold now trading at around $3,969.55 per ounce. Tokenization brings 24/7 markets and P2P flexibilityIndustry experts point to the convenience of tokenization as a key advantage. Speaking to Yahoo Finance, Will Peck, head of digital assets at WisdomTree, explained that tokenized gold allows for around-the-clock trading and direct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions. He added that gold and Bitcoin act as complementary stores of value, both serving as deflationary assets. Ian Kane, CEO of fintech company Firepan, said tokenized gold appeals to investors as it enables them to retain ownership, leverage their holdings for loans, and generate extra yield, while preserving their principal against debasement or devaluation. These views are not new. Earlier this month, Robinhood Markets CEO Vlad Tenev described tokenization as “a freight train” that “can’t be stopped,” predicting it will eventually transform the global financial system. Similarly, in his annual letter to investors in April, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink said the tokenization of assets could fundamentally reshape the way people invest. By digitizing ownership, tokenized venture capital funds could move beyond their closed circles, giving ordinary investors a stake in early-stage innovation and greater control over their capital. Venture capital faces hurdles in tokenization pushWhile tokenization promises greater accessibility and liquidity, not all market segments are ready for it. According to TheStreet, tokenized venture capital (VC) funds could open a traditionally closed market to more investors, but the process is more complex than it appears. In an interview with TheStreet, Elena Obukhova, founder of Supermoon Ventures, said that liquidity, not technology, is the main obstacle. Unlike tokenized company shares that can be traded freely on public markets, VC funds invest in private startups whose value may take years to materialize through an exit or acquisition. Allowing such funds to trade freely could increase volatility and pressure founders, as interim valuations might distort perceptions and weaken confidence in early-stage ventures. Still, the promise of tokenized venture finance remains within reach. Firms are testing models that limit trading periods, protect investor data, and refine valuation methods to better reflect the illiquid nature of startup investments. Since liquidity events such as initial public offering (IPOs) or acquisitions typically occur only every one to two years for early-stage startups, the path forward will depend on creating systems that can maintain stable and accurate valuations in the interim. Tokenization is rapidly emerging as a transformative force in the financial world, offering greater accessibility, liquidity, and efficiency. As more assets, from gold to venture capital, make their way onto the blockchain, the potential to reshape investment and trading markets grows. While challenges remain, particularly around liquidity and valuation in sectors like venture capital, the continued advancements in tokenization demonstrate its key role in the future of finance.