Top

Regulatory crackdown as Hong Kong authorities act against crypto entities

Policy & Regulation·December 08, 2023, 12:58 AM

In a recent move, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong has issued a public warning against suspected virtual asset-related frauds involving HongKongDAO and BitCuped, marking a significant crackdown on deceptive practices in the crypto space.

The action taken by the SFC in conjunction with the Hong Kong Police Force was outlined in a notice published on Wednesday. The notice stated:

“The SFC suspects HongKongDAO may be disseminating false and misleading information about itself and its business through online channels.”

In relation to BitCuped, it stated: “The SFC notes that BitCuped claims on its website that ‘Laura Cha’ and ‘Nicolas Aguzin’ serve as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer respectively, when in fact none of them has any affiliations with BitCuped.”

Photo by Teodor Kuduschiev on Unsplash

 

HongKongDAO’s alleged misinformation

Operating under the name “Hong Kong Digital Research Institute,” HongKongDAO has faced accusations of disseminating false and misleading information. The SFC expressed concerns about the claims made by HongKongDAO, including assertions of licensing by the SFC, engagement in regulated activities since July 2020, and bids for a “Hong Kong Digital Currency Exchange Licence” related to the government’s stablecoins framework.

The SFC contends that these claims are unfounded and could potentially mislead the public into believing that HongKongDAO’s services are officially sanctioned and legitimate.

HongKongDAO seems to manage at least two Telegram groups, one in Chinese with over 10,000 members and the other in English with over 1,700 members. Within these groups, there appears to be a promotion of the purported “market” price and future market value of the HKD token, enticing investors to make purchases.

 

Allegations of BitCuped false affiliations

Simultaneously, BitCuped has been accused of making fraudulent claims to enhance the credibility of its operations. The company falsely asserted affiliations with prominent figures Laura Cha and Nicolas Aguzin, claiming them as its chairman and CEO, respectively. However, the SFC has refuted these affiliations. Laura Cha is the Chairman of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), while Nicolas Aguzin is the Executive Director and CEO of HKEX.

Taking proactive measures, the SFC has requested the Hong Kong Police Force to block access to the websites of both HongKongDAO and BitCuped. Cease and desist letters have also been issued to the operators of these websites, demanding the cessation of the sale of HKD Tokens offered by HongKongDAO.

 

Series of crypto scams

Following the JPEX fraud allegations in September, Hong Kong faced another cryptocurrency exchange scandal involving Hounax in November. With at least 145 police reports filed and a sum of over HK$148 million ($19 million) involved, affected investors expressed frustration at what they deemed a slow response from regulatory bodies.

These incidents have reignited discussions about the need for more robust cryptocurrency regulations in Hong Kong. The city’s aspiration to become a global hub for crypto innovation and adoption faces challenges due to a lack of clear and consistent regulation, leaving investors vulnerable to fraud and manipulation.

In light of these developments, the SFC emphasized the importance of public caution regarding investment opportunities that seem too good to be true. The regulator urged vigilance against social media and instant messaging platforms where individuals, not investment professionals, might lure unsuspecting investors.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Nov 06, 2023

Korbit and Shinhan Bank hold seminar to strengthen suspicious crypto transaction reporting

Korbit and Shinhan Bank hold seminar to strengthen suspicious crypto transaction reportingKorbit, one of the top five cryptocurrency exchanges in South Korea, revealed on Monday (local time) that it conducted a seminar in collaboration with Shinhan Bank last month aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of suspicious transaction report (STR) filings.Photo by Nick Fewings on UnsplashEnhancing suspicious transaction reportingThe seminar held at Korbit’s premises was a collaborative forum where experts from both the exchange and Shinhan Bank exchanged insights and engaged in a question-and-answer session. The agenda covered areas such as the writing of STR reports, monitoring based on particular themes and the education of staff members. The gathering featured key participants, including Jin Chang-hwan, Compliance Officer of Korbit, and Yoo Jung-yeol, Head of the Digital Assets Team at Shinhan Bank as well as personnel from both organizations involved in anti-money laundering (AML) initiatives.Focus on complianceEarlier this year, Korbit and Shinhan Bank held a meeting to go over the Financial Intelligence Unit’s (FIU) comprehensive evaluation of virtual asset service providers (VASPs). This evaluation examined how well VASPs complied with the Travel Rule. Additionally, the meeting allowed both organizations to exchange ideas on how to enhance their compliance processes. In a move ahead of the industry, Korbit in September became the first Korean crypto exchange to adopt new rules for real-name bank accounts, a policy that will become mandatory in January of the following year.Oh Se-jin, Korbit’s CEO, highlighted the increasing significance of filing STRs, citing recent FIU data that showed VASPs submitted more STRs in the first three quarters of this year than in the entirety of last year. He affirmed Korbit’s dedication to establishing itself as a secure and reliable cryptocurrency exchange through ongoing collaborations with Shinhan Bank.Meanwhile, Korbit has managed to cut down the review period for STRs to a third of its previous duration. Additionally, the exchange verifies the effectiveness of its STR rules by performing monthly evaluations and seeking advice from external consultants.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Apr 11, 2023

Chinese Insurer Founds 2 Crypto Funds in Hong Kong

Chinese Insurer Founds 2 Crypto Funds in Hong KongChina has been in the headlines lately as the country continues to take a growing interest in cryptocurrencies in spite of a previous clampdown. According to a blog post published last Thursday, a Chinese state-owned insurance company launched two crypto funds, further solidifying the country’s stance on digital assets.©Pexels/Charlie JinChinese crypto resurgenceChinese insurance behemoth, the China Pacific Insurance Company (CPIC) has launched the two cryptocurrency funds in Hong Kong. The funds will be managed by the firm’s asset management unit, CPIC Investment Management, and have been established in conjunction with venture capital and blockchain start-up investment firm, Waterdrip Capital. Furthermore, they will focus on investments in cryptocurrencies and related assets, with a particular emphasis on Bitcoin and Ethereum.Waterdrip was originally founded in Shanghai in 2017, and has previously invested in the Chinese crypto mining sector, together with other blockchain-related projects. The move comes as China continues to make strides towards becoming a leader in the digital currency space. Last year, the country’s central bank announced plans to create its own digital currency, which is currently in the testing phase. The move is seen as a way for China to gain more control over its financial system and reduce its reliance on the US dollar.Hong Kong crypto hubChina’s growing interest in cryptocurrencies has been driven in part by the country’s rapidly growing tech industry. Companies like Tencent and Alibaba are leading the way in digital payments and e-commerce, and many believe that cryptocurrencies will play a key role in the future of online transactions.The launch of these two crypto funds by a state-owned insurance company is just the latest indication of the formative development of Hong Kong as a crypto hub. Its believed that China is treating crypto development in Hong Kong as a manner in which it can determine how digital assets can be utilized subsequently on mainland China.It’s not the first time a state-owned entity has gotten involved in cryptocurrency. Earlier this year, a state-owned company launched two crypto funds in Hong Kong, with a focus on investing in Bitcoin and other digital assets.Previous crypto crackdownDespite China’s growing interest in cryptocurrencies, the country has also taken a tough stance on the industry in the past. In 2017, the Chinese government banned initial coin offerings (ICOs) and shut down local cryptocurrency exchanges. However, it appears that the country’s stance is shifting, with the launch of these two crypto funds serving as a clear indication of China’s growing interest in digital assets.While China’s embrace of cryptocurrencies is seen by many as a positive development for the industry, there are also concerns about the country’s growing influence in the space. With China’s central bank developing its own digital currency, some worry that the country could use it to further extend its financial reach and influence around the world.Despite these concerns, it’s clear that China’s interest in cryptocurrencies is only growing. As the country continues to make strides in the digital currency space, it will be interesting to see how it impacts the global economy and the future of finance.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 21, 2025

Binance-Gopax deal under scrutiny as Korean lawmakers press for investor protection

During a National Policy Committee audit, South Korean lawmakers pressed financial regulators on their oversight of the domestic crypto market, focusing on Binance’s acquisition of local exchange Gopax, risks from order-book sharing with foreign platforms, and weaknesses in anti–money laundering (AML) controls.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashQuestions over Gopax compensationAccording to Kuki News, Democratic Party lawmaker Min Byeong-dug has urged regulators to reach out to Binance for details on its plan to compensate Gopax creditors following its acquisition of the local exchange. One of the nation’s five fiat-to-crypto exchanges, Gopax suspended withdrawals from its GoFi service, a yield-bearing product, in November 2022 after the collapse of the Bahamas-based FTX crypto exchange and the bankruptcy of Genesis, a U.S.-based crypto financial services firm. Citing investor losses estimated at 10 billion to 50 billion won (about $7 million–$35 million), Min said Binance had agreed to cover the shortfall as part of its cashless acquisition of Gopax, but full repayment to Korean users remains unresolved. He noted that the deal had faced delays due to concerns raised by the Financial Services Commission’s (FSC) Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) over Binance’s eligibility as a major shareholder, and urged the FSC and FIU to ensure a clear and timely resolution for affected investors. Concerns over order-book sharingPeople Power Party (PPP) lawmaker Lee Heon-seung raised additional concerns about order-book sharing tied to the Binance–Gopax deal, warning it could create regulatory blind spots. According to Dailian, he asked the FIU about risks such as possible gaps in AML oversight at foreign exchanges and the potential exposure of Korean user data. FIU head Park Gwang said inadequate AML systems at overseas platforms can hinder fund tracing. He noted that separate approval is required before a domestic exchange can share its order book with a foreign platform, adding that no such request was under discussion. Park said the FIU would closely examine the matter and ensure protection of personal data. Lee also questioned how effectively regulators can supervise the crypto market given its scale, pointing to the Bithumb exchange as an example, where he had raised similar concerns about order-book sharing. Bithumb serves about 3.8 million users and records roughly 605 trillion won (approximately $426 billion) in annual trading volume. He said order-book sharing with major global exchanges such as Binance could complicate AML compliance, data protection, and regulatory oversight, and called for stronger enforcement. In response, Park said that the agency would ensure proper supervision to address these risks. Allegations of AML loopholes and illicit useAnother PPP lawmaker, Kim Jae-sub, flagged a potential AML loophole involving Binance, saying the exchange had allegedly been used by Cambodia’s Prince Group, which is linked to fraudulent schemes to conceal illicit funds. Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a civil forfeiture complaint to seize roughly 127,271 Bitcoin linked to Prince Group’s operations, marking the largest seizure in its history. Kim also cited past allegations connecting Binance to illicit transactions involving Hamas and North Korea, and said the exchange’s founder faces related charges. He urged the FSC to conduct a thorough examination to determine the extent of any involvement if the claims prove accurate. As the parliamentary audit continues, lawmakers from both parties are pressing regulators to clarify standards, tighten oversight, and prioritize investor protection while maintaining fair and predictable rules for market participants. 

news
Loading