Regulatory clarity spurs traditional brokerages’ interest in Hong Kong

Japan’s FSA Proposes Tax Exemption for Unrealized Crypto GainsThe Financial Services Agency (FSA) of Japan has taken the step of putting forward amendments that provide a notable tax exemption for unrealized gains on cryptocurrency holdings.Photo by Erik Eastman on UnsplashFSA proposalThe move is significant in that it spares domestic companies from the standard 30% corporate tax rate typically imposed on digital assets up until now. According to reports in local media, that proposal was detailed in a comprehensive 16-page document outlining various regulatory modifications.The most pivotal change within this document is the exemption of domestic companies from the annual “unrealized gains” tax on cryptocurrencies. Unlike some countries that only tax crypto assets when they are converted into fiat currency, Japan currently enforces an annual tax on these digital assets.2023 tax reform agendaThe proposed amendment has garnered support from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, indicating its potential passage. These discussions are part of Japan’s broader tax reform agenda for 2023, suggestive of the Asian nation’s interest in fostering a favorable environment for the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.It is important to note that this tax exemption applies exclusively to companies that issue their own tokens and does not extend to entities solely involved in investing in other digital currencies. Additionally, individual crypto investors will still be subject to a maximum income tax rate of 55% on earnings exceeding JPY 200,000 ($1,355) related to cryptocurrency, categorized as “miscellaneous income.”The exemption is structured in a way that excludes these digital coins when assessing a company’s asset market value, provided specific conditions are met. Presently, Japanese law mandates that companies holding crypto assets must pay taxes on unrealized gains at the end of each tax period.To qualify for the tax exemption, a company must meet specific criteria outlined by the tax authority. Firstly, the company must be the issuer of the cryptocurrency in question. Additionally, it must retain continuous ownership of the crypto asset after issuance, while the asset itself remains subject to transfer restrictions.Blockchain ambitionsThis development aligns with Japan’s broader ambition to nurture and expand its blockchain and cryptocurrency sectors. Prime Minister Fumio Kishida recently articulated a vision for a “new form of capitalism,” emphasizing the importance of fostering innovation and growth in emerging industries, inclusive of the Web3 sector. As Japan moves forward with these changes, it signals its interest in creating a conducive environment for blockchain and crypto ventures to thrive.Over time Japan has been iteratively building a framework in respect of digital assets. In 2017 the country recognized Bitcoin as a legitimate property in accordance with the Payment Services Act (PSA). That same year, the Tax Agency classified crypto earnings as miscellaneous income. In 2020, crypto assets were included in Japan’s fund settlement law. Around the same time frame, the FSA brought in the requirement for crypto exchanges to register and obtain a license.These amendments also form part of a series of changes that the Japan Blockchain Association (JBA), an industry advocacy group, has been canvassing for. The proposed changes reflect a pragmatic approach to taxation, doing away with a paper profits taxation treatment in favor of a more progressive approach.

Korean Financial Authority Installs Report Center to Counter Crypto ScamsThe Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) announced today that it has installed a dedicated report center aimed at combating investment fraud related to virtual assets. From June 1 through to the end of this year, the report center will run a reporting campaign.Photo by Katrin Hauf on UnsplashSurge in crypto fraud casesWhile the National Assembly is working on the legislation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill, there has been a surge in fraudulent activities exploiting regulatory loopholes. According to the FSS, the number of reported cases of crypto fraudulent activities in Korea surged by 67.2% last year, reaching 199, compared to the previous year’s 119.In a proactive response to this rising concern, the FSS has set up a report center, designed to staunch the escalating tide of fraud.Coordinated efforts against financial fraudUnder the guidance of the Anti-Financial Fraud Office, the report center will operate collaboratively with other relevant departments, such as the Consumer Finance Department and the Asset Management Examination Department. Reports can be filed either via landline or through the FSS website.Swift actions on detected fraudAs part of its policy, the FSS will swiftly inform investigative agencies, like the prosecutors’ office, if an issue raised via the report center is deemed severe or contains specific facts that necessitate further scrutiny.The financial watchdog emphasized its commitment to issuing financial consumer warnings whenever potential fraud is detected and poses a risk to investors. This strategy is designed to safeguard investors and impede the spread of damages.

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory frameworkThe Indian courts have declined a consideration targeting the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading, following a plea which had been brought to court by a petitioner.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashBeyond the court’s purviewIndia’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, recently confronted a petition urging the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading. According to a local media report, the bench, which included Justices JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea, emphasizing that the demands presented were legislative and thus beyond the court’s direct action purview. This decision points to the judiciary’s recognition of its constraints in crafting laws, particularly in intricate domains like cryptocurrency.The petitioner, Manu Prashant Wig, a former director at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited currently in custody due to allegations of cryptocurrency fraud, sought relief through a public interest litigation (PIL) for crypto trading regulations in India.The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police accused Wig in 2020 of deceiving investors with promises of high returns from crypto investments, involving 133 reported victims of the scheme. Despite this, during the hearing, the Supreme Court advised Wig to pursue legal remedies through appropriate channels, specifically for bail, underlining its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Constitution for legislative matters.Judiciary criticize governmentWhile the judiciary has found that it cannot act itself in putting in place a crypto regulatory framework, the Supreme Court has been critical of the government’s inaction on the matter. In July, India’s highest court criticized the Indian government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations.Interestingly, while the government hasn’t acted locally, it has been making efforts to drive regulation at an international level instead. The status of cryptocurrency trading in India remains uncertain, with the country developing a regulatory framework influenced by recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), potentially leading to legal legislation within the next several months.Prime Minister Modi called on authorities internationally to establish a worldwide regulatory framework. At the recent G20 summit, it appears that member states did reach agreement on such a framework.The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL marks a clear distinction between judicial and legislative responsibilities. As India moves closer to formulating a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework, this decision reinforces the imperative for legislative action to address mounting concerns and interests in the crypto market.Awaiting legislative actionThe outcome of these developments is keenly awaited by investors, legal experts and the crypto community, poised to shape the future landscape of cryptocurrency trading in India. The decision signifies the judiciary’s acknowledgment of its limitations and highlights the necessity for a legislative approach to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.In this evolving scenario, the verdict amplifies the importance of a well-defined regulatory framework. As the world’s most populous country grapples with the delicate task of balancing innovation and investor protection, the Supreme Court’s decision places the ball firmly in the legislative court.