Busan Introduces Blockchain-Powered Cards for Multi-Children Families to Offer Social Benefits

South Korea's Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce a bill this week aimed at establishing a legal framework for digital assets, according to Edaily. The move is part of the party's ongoing efforts to advance its crypto policy agenda ahead of the upcoming presidential election. The proposed law would define the legal status of digital assets and set rules for their issuance, distribution and listing. The bill is expected to keep the requirement for Korean won-pegged stablecoin issuers to obtain authorization with a minimum reserve of 5 billion won ($3.58 million), a key point of debate.Photo by Brady Bellini on UnsplashA DPK official stated that the bill has been drafted and is set to be introduced to the National Assembly this week, following feedback from internal subcommittees. Most of the provisions remain consistent with last month’s draft, but final comments are still being collected on stablecoin reserve requirements, which have been a major point of discussion. Defining digital assetsThe bill defines digital assets as "electronic records with economic value based on blockchain technology" and establishes a regulatory framework for issuers, exchanges and custodians. Key provisions include permitting initial coin offerings (ICOs) and creating a digital asset committee under the Financial Services Commission (FSC). This committee would oversee legal framework design, market monitoring, and policy promotion. Additionally, an industry association will establish a separate committee to oversee token listing practices, ensuring consistent listing standards across exchanges. The most contentious part of the draft has been the regulations for won-based stablecoins. It classifies stablecoins as digital assets akin to fiat currency, requiring a minimum reserve of 5 billion won and authorization from the FSC. It also mandates real-time reserve disclosures, secure asset custody and quarterly reporting. Divide over stablecoin reserve requirementOpinions on the reserve requirement are divided. Some industry insiders argue that the 5 billion won threshold is too high, creating a barrier for startups. Others believe a minimum capital requirement is necessary due to stablecoins' role in payments and their potential as currency substitutes. Lee Jung-yup, president of the Blockchain Law Society, stressed that stablecoins must maintain a basic level of trust, warning that those failing to meet the 5 billion won threshold could become prone to insolvency or fraud. However, Lee acknowledged concerns about the centralized regulatory approach led by financial authorities and the potential for market dominance by large corporations. He suggested exploring the creation of an independent regulatory body for cryptocurrencies, warning that overly strict regulations could stifle domestic digital finance innovation amid growing global competition. Crime surges with market growthWhile regulations continue to evolve, crypto crimes are also rising sharply amid the expanding digital asset market. According to Segye Ilbo, South Korean police arrested about 2,100 individuals for crypto-related offenses last year—17 times more than in 2017, when data collection began. The total losses from such crimes now exceed 1 trillion won ($714 million) annually. Since the election of U.S. President Donald Trump, known for his crypto-friendly stance, Korea's crypto market has experienced rapid growth. This surge has raised concerns about an increase in fraud targeting investors chasing quick profits. 

SEC seeks summary judgment against Terraform LabsThe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is making a strong push for a summary judgment in its ongoing legal battle against Singapore’s Terraform Labs and its co-founder Do Kwon. Such an outcome would spare the need for a protracted trial.According to a motion filed by the SEC on Thursday, the record shows that there is “no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”Photo by Caleb Fisher on UnsplashRelying on the Howey TestThe SEC’s filing underscores its central argument that Kwon and Terraform Labs were involved in the sale of securities. The document categorically states:“There is no dispute that purchasers made an investment of money, either through fiat currency or crypto assets, for each crypto asset — LUNA, wLUNA, MIR, and UST, thereby satisfying the first prong of Howey.” The Howey Test refers back to a U.S. Supreme Court case — SEC v. Howey — which took place in 1946. The case set a precedent and has subsequently become the cornerstone of determining what is or is not a security in the United States.This argument hinges on the idea that funds were pooled in a common enterprise with the expectation of profits primarily derived from the efforts of the promoters.Citing fraud as well as unregistered securitiesThe SEC’s assertion is two-fold, contending that not only did Terraform and Kwon engage in selling securities, but they also engaged in fraudulent activities and disseminated misleading information. The SEC reiterates these claims in its filing, emphasizing that the defendants committed fraud by duping investors about the stability of UST.They allegedly falsely attributed the algorithm for price stabilization while orchestrating clandestine third-party interventions. This purported deception made their claims regarding the algorithm’s effectiveness deceptive and involved the omission of crucial information. The fallout from Terra’s collapse in May of the previous year resulted in the destruction of substantial investor wealth, totaling billions of dollars.Similar defense team filingThe SEC’s move to seek summary judgment comes in the wake of a similar filing by Kwon’s defense team last Friday. Kwon is currently serving a sentence for document forgery in Montenegro, a situation stemming from his arrest at an airport with forged passports.Notably, Terraform’s co-founder, Daniel Shin, who is currently on trial in South Korea, has attributed the collapse of Terraform Labs to Kwon’s mismanagement. Shin has claimed his separation from the company and its activities occurred two years before its eventual collapse.In this legal battle that holds significant implications for the cryptocurrency and blockchain space, the SEC continues to emphasize its position, asserting that Kwon and Terraform Labs engaged in the sale of securities through deceptive means. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching consequences, setting precedents for future regulatory actions in the industry.

Top Korean Crypto Exchanges Witness Surge in Listings and Delistings During H1In the first half of this year, South Korea’s top five cryptocurrency exchanges experienced notable growth in the number of newly added cryptocurrencies to their platforms. However, they also observed a significant surge in the number of cryptocurrencies being delisted.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashDelisting and listingAccording to a report by local news outlet Etoday, the nation’s five leading exchanges Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax ceased trading for a total of 51 cryptocurrencies during the first six months of this year. This marked an 88% increase compared to the 27 cryptocurrencies delisted in the previous six-month period. During the first half of last year, the number of delisted tokens was 48.Among the five exchanges, Coinone took the lead by delisting the highest number of cryptocurrencies, totaling 24. Bithumb followed with 14 delisted tokens, Gopax with six, Upbit with five, and Korbit with two. Notably, Coinone continued its delisting spree this month, removing an additional five cryptocurrencies from its platform. Most cryptos were delisted because their projects and services were not operating normally.The significant number of delisted tokens at Coinone appears to be linked to the involvement of its former employees in the unlawful listing of certain tokens. These individuals reportedly received bribes in exchange for listing a total of 46 cryptocurrencies on the trading platform. Among these tokens were PICA and PURE, which are no longer traded on the exchange.Only five cryptocurrencies were delisted according to the decision made by the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), a self-regulatory group consisting of the aforementioned five crypto exchanges. The delisted tokens were REP, BASIC, OMG, SRM, and PCI. This indicates that most of the affected cryptocurrencies were exclusively traded on one of the DAXA member exchanges, indicating that DAXA’s listing and delisting guidelines were largely ineffective.Meanwhile, there has been a notable surge in the number of newly added cryptocurrencies. Bithumb, for instance, took the lead by listing an impressive 63 new tokens, nearly three times the number listed by Upbit (22). In the same vein, Coinone added 14 tokens, while Korbit and Gopax followed with six and three new listings, respectively.Profit squeezeLast year, crypto trading platforms adopted a conservative approach when it came to listing and delisting procedures, prioritizing investor protection. However, their stance shifted as the global crypto market encountered a significant decline in trading volume amid crypto winter. This decrease in trading activity subsequently led to reduced operating profits, compelling the platforms to list more cryptocurrencies.With the exception of Upbit, which maintains a dominant market share in the nation, the outlook on crypto exchanges appears more or less grim. In particular, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax are in the red. Bithumb, while still in profit, saw its operating profit last year falling 80% year-over-year to 163.5 billion KRW ($127.9 million). This trend continued this year, with Bithumb’s operating profit In the first quarter of this year recording 16.2 billion KRW, an 80% decrease compared to the same period last year.In light of this development, an industry insider, who wished to stay anonymous, told Etoday that while the market’s total trading volume is witnessing a considerable decline, Upbit’s dominance is still growing. This individual also noted that the decrease in trading volume and the resulting deficit are exerting pressure on exchanges to expand their cryptocurrency listings.