Japanese Survey Finds One-Third Familiar with Web3

Non-Fiat Crypto Exchanges in Korea Urge Banks for Real-Name AccountsThe Virtual Asset Exchange Association (VXA) made an announcement today regarding its recent due diligence request sent to 12 South Korean banks, as reported by local news outlet Digital Today. These banks have not yet entered into contracts to provide real-name deposit and withdrawal accounts to cryptocurrency exchanges.VXA is a group comprised of representatives from ten non-fiat crypto trading platforms in the country. Among its members, eight exchanges–Aprobit, Probit, BTX, Foblgate, GDAC, Flata Exchange, Flybit, and High Block (previously known as Huobi Korea)–participated in the request.Photo by Eduardo Soares on UnsplashPartnerships with banksThe objective of the request is to urge the banks to consider establishing partnerships with competent non-fiat exchanges. The requesters argued that such collaborations would promote fair trading in the market and provide customers with more options. They highlighted the growing presence of the virtual asset trading sector in the capital market.Uneven crypto marketAn official from VXA emphasized the key role played by real-name bank account issuers in creating a healthy environment that addresses the existing monopoly in the Korean crypto market. According to a March report published by the Financial Services Commission, non-fiat crypto trading platforms accounted for only 3 percent of the total Korean crypto market capitalization during the second half of 2022. The remaining 97 percent was attributed to fiat-supporting crypto exchanges.The official further explained that allowing more exchanges to support the trading of the Korean won currency would contribute to shaping a free market while bolstering transparency and investor protection.Legal requirementsEarlier this month, VXA also sought fair due diligence from five Korean banks that have already formed partnerships with fiat-supporting crypto exchanges. In Korea, crypto trading platforms are required by law to obtain real-name accounts from banks in order to provide cash deposit and withdrawal services.

Web3 entertainment platform Playbux is set to embark on a public token sale in a departure from the more established initial coin offering (ICO) model favored by many crypto and Web3 platforms in the past.Photo by Mackenzie Marco on UnsplashFair community offering (FCO)Aiming to raise $150,000 later this month Playbux, a blockchain-based e-commerce metaverse platform that runs on the BNB chain, has opted for a fair community offering (FCO). As part of the FCO, it will provide pre-listing access exclusively to engaged users through Dubai-headquartered crypto investing platform Raiser, backed by Visa. In a series of posts on social media platform X on Monday, Raiser set out what it plans to bring to market by way of the FCO model.  According to the startup, FCO involves ranking project users based on on-chain activity, referrals, participation in educational quizzes and following the platform's X profile.  As the company puts it, “engagement is the king. The more interactive challenges you complete - the higher you climb on the Raiser.co leaderboard.” Users, depending on their ranking, gain the opportunity to invest in the project's token before its official listing on centralized exchanges. Raiser is being supported in its FCO model offering by market maker Kairon Labs. An alternative to ICOsThis community fundraising mechanism emerges as an alternative to ICOs, which, in the earlier days of crypto, became associated with fraudulent activities. The surge in ICOs between 2017 and 2018 led to a mix of success stories, like Ethereum raising $18 million in 2014. However, the funding mechanism was sharply criticized as it also attracted unsavory actors due to the lack of reporting requirements and accounting standards. In the aftermath of the ICO era, centralized crypto exchanges now mandate projects to lock a portion of their token supply at launch and vest some supply to prevent excessive dumping by investors. Raiser co-founder Kori Leon, who previously worked on the listings team at Binance, notes that Raiser's FCO process aligns with these stricter listing requirements while offering community members pre-listing token access, potentially reducing the urge to sell tokens immediately upon listing. Leon stated:”Our goal is to effectively support both the community and centralized exchanges, who show belief in the potential success of new projects through initial listings. Our unique platform rewards active community members and so assists exchanges in their strategic decisions.” Playbux's PBUX token, part of Binance Labs' incubation program and included in Visa's Asia Pacific 2023 accelerator program, will undergo a public FCO in late January, according to Leon. The metaverse-focused platform is known for its shop-to-earn experiences and customizable avatars. Playbux was founded by Thai entrepreneurs Tay Sitthisaktanakul and CEO Sarun Vichayabhai in 2022. This move by the firm through the utilization of FCOs signifies a shift away from the tarnished ICO model, acknowledging the importance of community engagement and responsible token distribution. 

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.