WEMIX Play Completes Successful Migration to the WEMIX3.0 Mainnet

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance Lawrence Wong is slated to unveil the Singapore 2024 Budget Statement on Feb. 16. As Singapore prepares for the unveiling of its 2024 Budget, the city-state’s Web3 community is amplifying its call for crucial government backing. That’s according to a recent report by The Straits Times. The plea from Singaporean firms revolves around two pivotal areas: one, nurturing a proficient talent pool well-versed in blockchain technology; and, in addition to that, having a strength and depth in cybersecurity, so as to fortify defenses against cyber threats.Photo by David Pardo Bernal on UnsplashUrgent need for Web3 talentSome time ago, stakeholders in Singapore set out their stall in terms of the ambition of firmly establishing the city-state as a global hub for Web3 development. It’s off to a good start with many notable crypto and Web3 companies having established themselves in Singapore. However, broadening that industry hub to the fullest extent will involve overcoming the significant hurdles hindering the growth trajectory of Singapore’s Web3 sector. Top of the list is the scarcity of skilled professionals in the blockchain domain. Danny Lim, a core contributor at MarginX, a decentralized exchange, stressed the pressing demand for seasoned developers. Lim underscored the necessity of supporting Web2 developers transitioning into Web3 realms, especially those grappling with job displacement, to solidify Singapore’s status as a nucleus for groundbreaking blockchain ventures. Elaine Zhu, the general manager of the Asian division of blockchain infrastructure firm Parity Technologies, emphasized the critical need for blockchain education, expressing apprehension over the dwindling influx of new developers. In citing a recent report by crypto-focused venture capital firm Electric Capital which quantified developer activity across Web3, Zhu noted that the number of experienced developers in Singapore remains healthy. However, the report found that the number of newly qualified developers dropped by 52 percent last year. Bolstering cyber defensesAdditionally, the industry is clamoring for fortified cyber defenses to shield against the escalating threat landscape targeting digital assets. This focus on security underscores the broader challenge of ensuring the secure proliferation of Web3 technologies and digital currencies within Singapore’s technological ecosystem. A report by Singapore-based blockchain security firm Beosin last year found that exit scams are a growing concern in the crypto-sphere. At the end of last month, the Singapore Police Force, alongside the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA), issued an advisory in order to raise awareness regarding crypto-centric cyber attacks. Ong Chengyi, representing Chainalysis, hailed Web3 as pivotal for long-term growth and advocated for sustained governmental support to enhance the sector’s capability in mitigating risks using advanced technological solutions. Ong remarked:“We hope to see more public-private collaboration to bolster Singapore’s defences against crypto crime and cyber threats more generally, through the utilization of data and technology.” Angela Ang of TRM Labs echoed that sentiment, emphasizing the imperative for heightened regulatory support to nurture the expansion of digital assets. Ang stated:“To deliver clarity to businesses at scale, whether it’s through licensing decisions or implementation guidance, the Government must invest in both human capital and technology throughout the regulatory process.” 

New York Bans CoinEx While Seizing Crypto AssetsCoinEx, a Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency exchange, has been banned from operating in the US state of New York by Attorney General Letitia James. The ban comes after the exchange allegedly failed to register as a securities and commodities brokerage and falsely represented itself as an exchange.Photo by Jan van der Wolf on Pexels$1.7 million seizureThat’s according to a statement published by the Office of the New York State Attorney General on Thursday. As part of an agreement reached between the parties, over $1.7 million worth of CoinEx’s funds have been seized.Under the terms of the agreement, approximately $1.1 million will be returned to 4,691 investors from New York, and an additional $600,000 will be paid in penalties to the state. To prevent access by New York IP addresses, CoinEx must implement geo-blocking. Moreover, the exchange is forbidden from creating new accounts for customers based in the United States.Trade prohibitionThis recent development resolves a lawsuit filed against CoinEx in February by the New York state. The state accused the exchange of misleading investors and failing to register with local authorities. In accordance with the consent order, CoinEx is now prohibited from offering, selling, or purchasing securities and commodities in New York and cannot make its platform available in the state.James emphasized the consequences for crypto companies that disregard New York’s laws and put investors at risk. The agreement serves as a warning that her office will continue to crack down on such companies. CoinEx users have a 90-day period to recover their crypto funds directly from the exchange.After this period, eligible investors can request fiat currency refunds by emailing coinexrefund@ag.ny.gov. Refunds will be provided in cryptocurrency or cash equivalents held in accounts as of April 25.CoinEx faced a lawsuit in the New York Supreme Court on February 22, where Attorney General James alleged that the exchange engaged in fraudulent practices and violated the state’s Martin Act, known for its strict anti-fraud provisions. The complaint included tokens such as Amp, LBRY Credits (LBC), Rally (RLY), and Terra.Harsh stanceThe banning of CoinEx in New York highlights the regulatory scrutiny surrounding cryptocurrency exchanges and the importance of compliance with local laws and regulations. On the one hand, the enforcement actions taken by authorities aim to protect investors and ensure the integrity of the financial system.However, the state of New York has been particularly harsh in its dealings with crypto companies. As today’s statement reveals, the New York Attorney General has taken action previously against crypto exchange Kucoin, crypto lending platform Nexo, and USDT stablecoin issuer Tether.These actions tie in with the current anti-crypto regulatory pushback that prevails in the United States right now. Other state agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) who last week sued global crypto exchanges Coinbase and Binance, the Federal Reserve, the Department of the Treasury, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), have all conspired to crack down on the industry in the US in recent months.

Shapella Upgrade to Have limited Impact on ETH’s Selling PressureThe Shapella upgrade on the Ethereum network scheduled to take place on Wednesday will only have a limited impact on the selling pressure on ETH, according to a report by the research center at Korean cryptocurrency exchange Korbit.©Pexels/JievaniShapella upgradeOne of the key features of the Shapella upgrade is to allow withdrawal of staked ETH. This upgrade follows September’s Merge upgrade that switched the Ethereum network’s consensus algorithm from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake, significantly reducing electricity consumption.Impact on selling pressureTo predict the impact of the Shapella upgrade on the selling pressure on ETH, the analysts at Korbit Research calculated the amount of time it takes for all the ETH staked as of March 22 to be withdrawn. They believe this calculation is relevant because withdrawals of staked ETH could trigger bulk sales, potentially imposing a greater selling pressure on ETH.According to the findings, the daily sell volume for the first three days is expected to be 300,700 ETH, 0.254% of the circulating supply. This volume will gradually decrease to 43,000 ETH for the next six months and to 29,000 ETH for the following six months, each corresponding to 0.035% and 0.024% of the circulating supply, respectively.All in all, bulk selling of ETH is not likely, considering it will take about a year and five months for all the staked ETH to be withdrawn and that the amount of withdrawable ETH will stay relatively low for each period. Furthermore, since this analysis assumes an extreme case, the market will be able to effectively handle the volume over the six month to 18 month period.4 other reasonsIn addition, Korbit Research outlined four other aspects that limit the selling pressure on ETH.Firstly, there is some concern that the selling volume of ETH may increase due to unstaking resulting from the cessation of staking services at American crypto exchange Kraken. However, a decrease in the number of validators on the Ethereum network will raise the base reward. This may prompt those who unstaked ETH to stake them on other platforms, rather than selling them.Second, ETH locked up at liquidity staking protocols such as Lido Finance and Rocket Pool provide liquidity for representations of staked ETH. These platforms allow users to stake fewer than 32 ETH for rewards. According to a February Binance Research report, 57.7% of ETH stakers enjoy liquidity and rewards. Therefore, there may be a limited impetus to divest of staked ETH.Third, since only 41.1% of ETH stakers are seeing profits as of the time of writing the report, the remaining stakers would have to risk losses when withdrawing ETH. This suggests that those not yet seeing profits are more likely to keep ETH staked. Furthermore, Dune Analytics data shows that most of the ETH stakers with gains staked ETH when its price was relatively low, which indicates that they participated in staking in early days. Shivam Sharma, the author of the aforementioned Binance report, states that these ETH stakers are likely “some of the strongest Ethereum believers.”Lastly, despite the Shapella upgrade, ETH withdrawals at different staking pools may not be initiated immediately. This could limit the circulation of withdrawable ETH, which in turn would hinder the selling pressure on ETH.Macroeconomic factorsThe Korbit researchers concluded their paper with a note that the selling pressure on ETH will be more influenced by macroeconomic factors than technical factors. They added that a possible downturn in the overall economy and corrections in risky asset markets might lead investors to sell ETH.