Report: Asia Set to Dominate Web3 Gaming Market

Tether Critics Point to Previous Chinese Securities BackingUSDT stablecoin issuer Tether (USDT) has long faced persistent scrutiny and criticism due to the lack of transparency surrounding the assets backing their digital currencies. The latest allegations come in the form of a report by Bloomberg on Friday suggesting that the world’s largest stablecoin was once backed by securities issued by Chinese companies.Photo by Manuel Joseph on PexelsNYAG releases documentsThese findings were based on documents made public by the New York Attorney General (NY AG). The documents disclosed that Tether had listed securities issued by China’s state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Agricultural Bank of China as part of its reserves backing the USDT stablecoin.Rumors about USDT’s exposure to Chinese securities have circulated for a number of years. In 2021, a Bloomberg research report revealed that Tether’s reserves reportedly included billions of dollars in short-term loans to China-based companies, as well as a significant loan to the collapsed crypto lender Celsius Network.However, in February 2021, Tether reached a settlement with the NY AG’s office over accusations of providing misleading information about its reserves and losses. To address these concerns, Tether handed over documents such as letters, bank accounts, reserve holdings, and wallet addresses through the law firm Steptoe.Attestation reportTether’s latest attestation report for Q1 2023, released on May 10, offered further details about its reserves. According to the report, Tether’s reserves were valued at $81.8 billion at the end of the quarter, a significant increase from the earlier period of $14.8 billion. These reserves consisted of $53 billion in US Treasuries, $1.5 billion in Bitcoin, and $5.3 billion in loans described as “over-collateralized.”The disclosure of Tether’s previous backing by Chinese securities adds another layer of complexity to the stablecoin landscape, raising questions about the risk exposure and potential impact on the stability of these digital assets. Using Chinese commercial paper to back a US dollar stablecoin is a risky endeavor.It raises the same issues as we’ve seen with the plethora of crypto lenders that went bankrupt in 2022. In those cases, they were using customer money to speculate and turn a profit. That’s fine when it works but when it goes wrong, it is customers who suffer. In its defense, Tether has stated that it only held A1 rated banking sector Chinese commercial paper in 2022 in state-owned Chinese companies like Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp., and Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. It reduced this exposure to zero later that year.With the cryptocurrency community and regulators seeking greater transparency and accountability, the industry is likely to face increased scrutiny and calls for enhanced regulations to ensure the integrity of stablecoin operations moving forward.As regulators continue to assess and navigate the evolving crypto market, it remains to be seen how the industry will address these concerns and establish clearer guidelines for stablecoin issuers to ensure the trust and confidence of market participants.

Malaysian Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has said that Malaysian government agencies and the country’s central bank need to study blockchain and cryptocurrency from a policy perspective so as not to get left behind.Photo by Esmonde Yong on UnsplashConsidering major changesHis comments emerged alongside the news that Anwar had discussed digital finance policy matters with Abu Dhabi government officials and with Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the founder and former CEO of Binance. According to the New Straits Times, an English-language newspaper published in Malaysia, the Malaysian government is homing in on the establishment and adoption of a formal policy relative to digital assets and blockchain.  Anwar confirmed that discussions also related to “digital transformation, data centers and artificial intelligence (AI),” and that the demands that Malaysia now faces require the government to consider major changes. In discussion with local media, Anwar stated: "I proposed several months ago how our agencies, including security, treasury and Bank Negara study how Malaysia can explore this so we aren't left behind. Ensuring that is regulated could safeguard the people's interests and prevent leakages.” Crypto-friendly regulationsAnwar added that a “radical departure from the old ways” would be needed for Malaysia to remain competitive, emphasizing the need for the Southeast Asian country to keep up to speed through the application of crypto-friendly regulations. Addressing the pace of technological change, he stated: “This is an evolution which happens quickly and requires us to be equally fast. We feel that Malaysia should not be left behind while mired in an old financial system.” In moving towards setting out a clear policy relative to digital assets, the Malaysian prime minister is encouraged by his recent dialogue with United Arab Emirates (UAE) government officials. He said that they confirmed that they feel they can forge close cooperation with Malaysia on the matter. Anwar added:“We need to discuss this in detail, leave behind the old business model and give meaning to this digital finance policy.” Taking to the X social media platform, Binance’s CZ described the nature of his discussion with the Malaysian prime minister, stating: “The discussions were not about Binance but about the crypto industry and Malaysia, including regulations, policies, risks, and collaborations between industries and across national borders. Forward!” A pseudonymous crypto investor and programmer, @darren_com_my, responded to CZ’s tweet to explain that the Malaysian government provides support to the digital assets industry via government agencies, but that, on the other hand, it has blacklisted a number of exchanges such as HTX (formerly Huobi) and Binance.  The local regulator has issued licenses to six virtual asset service providers. In recent weeks, Malaysia’s Securities Commission has taken action against global exchange Bybit and crypto app Atomic Wallet, prohibiting them from trading within the jurisdiction due to both companies not having obtained the required licensing.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is set to gain enhanced powers through the Financial Institutions (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill 2024 (FIMA Bill), currently under consideration in the country's parliament.Photo by Kenneth Koh on UnsplashProfound impactIf the bill passes, it could have a profound impact on cryptocurrency firms operating in Singapore. One significant aspect of the proposed amendments is the expansion of MAS's authority to issue directives to capital markets services license (CMSL) holders involved in unregulated business activities. This move is particularly aimed at firms offering unregulated products that might pose contagion risks to their regulated operations. The bill cites examples such as bitcoin futures and payment token derivatives traded on overseas exchanges. At the moment, the regulator is actively monitoring the crypto space in Singapore, issuing investor alerts relative to unregulated entities. Last month, MAS added imToken, a non-custodial crypto wallet, to its Investor Alert List. The list serves as a means for the regulator to draw attention to entities that may be actively trading within the city-state while being wrongly perceived by the investing public as licensed or regulated entities. Greater powersIn response to potential risks, MAS had previously issued guidance on risk-mitigating measures for CMSL holders conducting unregulated business with retail investors. The FIMA bill seeks to empower MAS further by enabling it to issue written directions specifying the minimum standards and safeguards for CMSL holders and their representatives engaging in unregulated businesses. Cryptocurrency exchanges, potentially categorized as CMSL holders, along with Major Payment Institution (MPI) licensees, may face increased regulatory scrutiny. MAS has been active in implementing measures to curb speculation in cryptocurrency investments and has updated its regulatory framework for stablecoins. The bill introduces additional provisions empowering MAS to compel individuals to participate in interviews and provide written statements. It grants MAS the authority to enter premises without a warrant and obtain court orders to seize evidence. Furthermore, the bill allows MAS to approve agents appointed by foreign regulators for inspecting Singaporean financial institutions. Precursor to ETF offeringThe potential ramifications of the bill extend beyond local regulatory dynamics. Industry observers suggest a connection between these developments and the recent approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States. Lasanka Perera, CEO of Independent Reserve Singapore, recently highlighted that the approval of bitcoin ETFs in the U.S. will likely attract major global wealth management firms, intensifying the demand for bitcoin and transforming it into an accessible asset class for traditional institutions. Perera sees relevance in this proposed legislation as it pertains to the potential offering of spot bitcoin ETF products within the Republic of Singapore. While he speculates that it's too early to tell, he said Singapore’s proposed new bill to enhance regulatory authority over financial services, including bitcoin futures, makes provisions for possible spot bitcoin ETFs in the Republic. As Singapore continues to refine its regulatory framework, the proposed amendments reflect a broader trend of regulatory tightening in the global cryptocurrency landscape, emphasizing the importance of compliance and risk management for industry participants.