Foblgate adds Bithumb Burrito Wallet as newest registrable external wallet

Tether, the issuer of the USDT stablecoin, has teamed up with local partners in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in order to launch a dirham (AED)-backed stablecoin. In a statement published to the firm’s website on Aug. 21, Tether outlined that the stablecoin is being launched in partnership with Dubai-based technology conglomerate Phoenix Group and Green Acorn Investments, a company that describes itself as “a socially responsible investment firm dedicated to supporting critical sectors and supporting the generation of sustainable wealth and financial literacy.”Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashFully backed by AED reservesThe stablecoin issuer outlined that each token will be “fully backed by liquid UAE-based reserves.” Tether further maintained that the back-end management of the new token will adhere to the firm’s “transparent and robust reserve standards,” and that “every Dirham-pegged token is tied to the value of the AED, providing stability and confidence in its value.”  Tether dominates the stablecoin market where USDT accounts for $117 billion, against a backdrop of an overall stablecoin market valued at $169 billion.  Perennial skepticsThe company has perennially faced criticism for a lack of transparency relative to the backing of its USDT stablecoin, given its policy of providing attestation reports instead of fully comprehensive audits from a top-tier auditing firm. One of the firm’s critics, the pseudonymous X account @OccamiCrypto took to the social media platform to provide its reaction to this most recent development, stating: "This Tether UAE stablecoin 'launch' will likely be as real as Tether’s promised audit and real time reserve reporting." The Tether critic went on to claim that the announcement is nothing more than "Tether spin," and that Tether has never attempted to become regulated in any market and that nothing would come of it. Another Tether critic, freelance journalist Jacob Silverman, commented on the development on X, stating:”Russian businessmen in UAE must be rejoicing.” His comment is suggestive of a common assertion that Tether is being used to facilitate the circumvention of sanctions. According to the firm’s press release, it believes that the product will enable users locally to access the benefits of the AED in digital form. The company claims that it will “streamline international trade and remittances, reduce transaction fees, and provide a hedge against currency fluctuations, thus playing a crucial role in the financial ecosystem of the UAE and beyond.” Tether’s partner Phoenix Group has been active in the crypto-sphere in recent times through mining. In December of last year, the company sealed a $380 million deal with Chinese mining equipment manufacturer MicroBT. Earlier that month, the company went public on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX). On face value, this development appears positive. However, UAE-based crypto and blockchain lawyer Irina Heaver recently warned that tightening regulations within the UAE may shut down crypto payments within the country. Heaver specifically cited the use of USDT as being under threat, with the potential for stablecoin-based transactions to be prohibited as new rules are ushered in.  

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the city-state’s central bank and primary financial regulator, has set a deadline of June 30 for unlicensed digital token service providers (DTSPs) working out of Singapore to cease offering their services to clients in overseas markets.Photo by Hu Chen on UnsplashResponding to feedbackThe deadline emerged by way of a process MAS has followed as part of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022 (FSM Act). Last October, the regulator invited feedback from stakeholders related to the authority’s approach to the regulation of DTSPs. MAS published its response to that feedback on May 30.  It stated:”DTSPs which are subject to a licensing requirement under section 137 of the FSM Act must suspend or cease carrying on a business of providing DT services outside Singapore by 30 June 2025.” It added that it was not including any transitional arrangement for DTSPs despite MAS receiving such a suggestion from a number of feedback respondents. Instead, unlicensed DTSPs will need to abide by the June 30 deadline and have acquired a license by then or cease unlicensed activity.The regulator defines DTSPs as individuals, partnerships or Singapore corporations operating from a place of business in Singapore, including those formed or incorporated in Singapore who offer digital token services outside Singapore. Those found in breach of the regulation could face up to three years in prison and fines of up to S$250,000 ($195,000). Companies who have already obtained licensing or those exempted by way of the Securities and Futures Act, Payment Services Act and the Financial Advisers Act are free to continue trading. Challenging licensing requirementsThose who wish to become compliant will have to satisfy some challenging requirements. For those granted a license, an annual license fee of S$10,000 ($7,780) applies. Small-scale DTSPs need to satisfy a $150,000 ($116,670) ongoing capital requirement, while larger, well-established DTSPs must comply with a S$250,000 ($195,000) capital requirement. Additionally, MAS has put in place competency requirements related to a DTSP's CEO, directors, partners and managers. Hagen Rooke, a partner at law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, outlined on LinkedIn that while it's possible for unlicensed operators to obtain licensing, it will be very difficult to get a license. In its feedback response document, the regulator stated: “MAS will approach the licensing of DTSPs in a prudent and cautious manner and there will be extremely limited circumstances under which MAS will consider granting an applicant a licence under section 138 of the FSM Act.” Rooke advised crypto companies that may be affected to act swiftly in order to derisk through an operational restructuring or removing the businesses' Singapore touchpoints. He suggested that firms need to consider if it has customers outside of Singapore or front-office functions located outside of the city-state to determine if they could be affected by this regulatory measure. A number of Asian countries have moved to take action against unlicensed foreign firms that have engaged with local investors, with Thailand becoming the latest country to do so recently. However, the Singaporean authorities have approached the issue from the opposite perspective, citing the potential reputational risk that unlicensed DTSPs pose for Singapore.

Survey Reveals Over Half of Korean Financial Firms Eyeing Both Issuance and Distribution of Security TokensIn a recent survey conducted by fintech solution provider Koscom, it was found that more than half of South Korean financial companies interested in security token businesses are planning to undertake both the issuance and distribution of security tokens. This result reflects the belief of the financial firms that if they engage only in the secondary market, they will experience reduced profitability due to the necessity of lowering transaction fees amidst fierce competition, as per local business newspaper Hankyung.Photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash62% of financial firmsAt a seminar held today, Koscom revealed the result of this survey it conducted among a total of 95 entities interested in security tokens, consisting of 30 securities firms, three banks, one asset management company, and 61 token issuers. Among the financial firms that belong to the first three categories, 62% answered that they will conduct both the issuance and distribution of security tokens. 31% expressed a preference for conducting only issuance, while 7% were inclined towards distribution alone.The survey also highlighted that 38% of financial companies hold a positive outlook on the security token market, although they acknowledge insufficient understanding. Additionally, 34% of respondents anticipate that the security token market will rival the exchange-traded fund (ETF) market in terms of size, while only 10% believe it will eventually replace the initial public offering (IPO) market.Cultural contentWhen it comes to the underlying real-world assets (RWAs) for security tokens, cultural content emerged as the most preferred option, with 71% of respondents selecting it. Real estate followed closely at 66%, with energy (55%), artworks (41%), and agriculture and fisheries (21%) also garnering interest. Respondents were allowed to choose multiple options for this section.Similarly, cultural content remained the top choice among token issuers, favored by 21% of respondents. It was followed by real estate (16%), artworks (14%), intellectual property (14%), and agriculture and fisheries (9%).A Koscom official attributed the preference for cultural content and real estate as underlying assets to their accessibility and profitability.This seminar, organized by Koscom, aimed to create a supportive environment for issuers and distributors struggling to promote security token businesses. Hong Woo-sun, CEO of Koscom, said the company will leverage its expertise in the capital market and blockchain technology to collaborate with authorities and relevant organizations in lowering barriers to entry for market participants who need technical infrastructure.