Korean crypto exchange Upbit launches BTC-ETH Duo Index

Assemble Protocol’s Native Token Now Supported by Ceffu’s Custody SolutionAssemble Protocol, a blockchain-based global point integration platform headquartered in Hong Kong, has announced a partnership with Ceffu, previously known as Binance Custody, according to South Korean blockchain news outlet Bonmedia.Ceffu serves as the sole institutional custody partner of Binance Exchange, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange based on trading volume. It started as a custodian platform in 2021 and underwent a rebranding from Binance Custody to Ceffu in February. Ceffu offers support for a diverse range of digital assets, including BTC, ETH, BNB, LTC, and XRP.Photo by rc.xyz NFT gallery on Unsplash$1M minimum depositThrough this collaboration, ASM, the native token of Assemble Protocol, has been included in the list of Ceffu’s supported assets, enabling ASM holders to securely store their tokens in the custodian’s cold storage. The custody service imposes a minimum deposit requirement of $1 million worth of digital assets.Reward points to ASM tokenAssemble Protocol offers users the ability to unify their reward points obtained from various debit and credit cards into ASM. By integrating these scattered rewards, users can conveniently manage and utilize their points through a unified digital currency. The platform also rewards participants within its ecosystem with tokens based on their contributions. The more participants contribute, the greater their rewards. Moreover, advertisers can pay fees to Assemble Protocol to promote their products within the ecosystem.Park Kyu-do, CEO of Assemble Protocol, expressed his appreciation for Ceffu’s support of ASM, emphasizing the security and transparency it offers for storing assets. Park also mentioned that the collaboration with the Binance ecosystem will lead to further expansion of the protocol.Meanwhile, Assemble Protocol plans to launch mobile and desktop versions of Assemble 2.0 later this year.

South Korea’s FIU Faces Staffing Cuts Amid Crypto ChallengesThe Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), a department operating under the South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), is downsizing its Virtual Asset Inspection Division, reducing its members from nine to seven, as reported by the local news outlet Etoday. The FIU has faced chronic understaffing for several years, and with the cryptocurrency market expanding and issues accumulating, there is growing concern within the industry about the possibility of a regulatory and supervisory gap.Photo by JEONGUK — on UnsplashTemporary division’s tenure extensionMeanwhile, the FIU seeks to extend the tenure of the temporary virtual asset inspection division, currently scheduled to operate from September 16, 2023, until June 30, 2024. Presently, this division comprises one rank 4 officer, four rank 5 officers, three rank 6 officers, and one rank 7 officer. However, the upcoming organizational changes will involve the removal of one rank 5 officer and one rank 6 officer. Moreover, the two temporary employees (one rank 5 and one rank 6), assigned specifically to examine and analyze financial transactions related to virtual assets, will be reduced to a single rank 5 officer.Understaffing and budget issuesAfter several years of grappling with staffing shortages, it appears that a decision has been made to actually reduce the overall number of FIU personnel. Last year, when the NPC of the National Assembly reviewed the budget of the FSC, it pointed out the shortage of FIU personnel. According to the NPC’s report on the FSC, as of 2022, the FIU’s capacity was 83 staff members. However, the current number stands at only 68, which includes 34 individuals who have been seconded from other agencies. Additionally, there are an additional 13 personnel whose positions are not represented in the organizational chart.The FIU’s spending on labor costs has consistently been lower than that of the FSC’s headquarters each year. Between 2017 and July 2022, the FIU used, on average, 83.71% of its allocated budget for labor costs. In contrast, the FSC had a higher average utilization rate at 89.2%. The NPC pointed out that this discrepancy is largely due to staffing imbalances between the two organizations, suggesting that a reevaluation of staffing levels may be necessary.The FIU has long been considered a less popular unit within the FSC. In recent years, the situation has become particularly challenging for the Virtual Asset Inspection Division, which has been swamped with various problems. This has led to a general reluctance among FSC staff to join this particular division.A person familiar with the matter told Etoday that departments within the FSC focusing on financial policy areas like insurance, banking, and capital markets have traditionally been the go-to choices for those aiming for promotions. However, the source added that there’s been a recent shift: more officers are now showing interest in joining the FIU, often with an eye toward transitioning into related industries after retirement.MOIS hesitant on permanent staffingMeanwhile, the Ministry of the Interior and Safety (MOIS) has been reluctant to make the FSC’s Financial Innovation Bureau and the FIU’s Virtual Asset Inspection Division permanent fixtures. While the FSC argues that solidifying these divisions would necessitate a larger staff and budget, the MOIS is holding back. According to another source, the staffing issue isn’t exclusive to the FIU; the FSC as a whole is understaffed. Despite the FSC’s desire to expand its workforce, the MOIS remains unwilling to approve the additional resources.Crypto professionals are worried that financial regulators are cutting back on staff even as challenges within the sector continue to mount. An official from a virtual asset exchange voiced frustration, pointing to the contrasting approach in neighboring Japan. The official noted that Japan is actively pushing to advance its Web3 sector by not only establishing a dedicated virtual asset department within its Financial Services Agency, but also by forming specialized task forces to address specific challenges. The official finds it baffling that Korea, on the other hand, is downsizing departments that tackle these important issues.

Conflict Identified as Crypto.com Trading on its Own PlatformTrading practices at Crypto.com, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange, have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest within the digital assets industry.Citing a number of unnamed sources, the Financial Times (FT) made the claim in a report published on Monday.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsConflict of interestIn traditional financial markets, exchanges typically match buyers with sellers at competitive transparent prices, while market making and proprietary trading are conducted by separate private companies. However, US regulators have recently cracked down on similar activities at digital asset exchanges. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, faced 13 charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including allegations of manipulative trading to inflate trading volume.The presence of internal traders at Crypto.com has not been widely known since the company’s launch in 2016. The FT’s sources claim that Crypto.com executives provided sworn statements to external trading houses denying the company’s involvement in trading activities.Employees were allegedly instructed to deny the existence of an internal market-making operation. In response to inquiries, Crypto.com denied that employees were asked to lie, stating that their internal market maker functioned similarly to third-party market makers, ensuring tight spreads and efficient markets on their platform.The majority of Crypto.com’s revenue reportedly comes from its app for retail traders, where the company acts as the counterparty for transactions and operates as a broker model. The company’s trading team hedges these positions on various venues, including their own exchange, to maintain risk neutrality. Crypto.com emphasized that their exchange provides a level playing field for institutional traders.According to insiders, Crypto.com’s proprietary trading desk engages in trading activities on the company’s exchange and other platforms, solely focused on generating profits rather than facilitating an exchange. The market making desk, on the other hand, aims to enhance liquidity on the platform.Not a revenue sourceCrypto.com defended its practices by stating that comparing trading volumes to competitors is common in the industry. It said that the company’s priority is to continuously improve order book liquidity and reduce spreads, benefiting all participants. The firm told Decrypt that trading is not a source of revenue: “While we do have some market making activity, for example, we have internal market makers for our CFTC-regulated product Up/Downs in the United States.”As a private company, Crypto.com publishes accounts in different countries, but revenue breakdown by business line is not disclosed.Closure of institutional tradingFollowing the SEC’s enforcement actions, earlier this month Crypto.com announced the closure of its exchange for institutional US traders due to limited demand in the current market landscape, effective from June 21.In any marketplace transparency and fairness are crucial. It’s fair to say that there has been some level of sharp practice among some actors in the marketplace while regulators have been lacking in getting up to speed with the emergent sector, and moving to protect consumers. With the major crypto platform failures of 2022 has come renewed interest in resolving these issues. That may make for some short-term difficulty, but in the longer term, it should mean greater protections for market participants so long as a common sense approach is pursued.