GRVT snags license to become world’s first regulated DEX

DDC Enterprise, a Chinese company headquartered in Hong Kong and listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), has become the latest corporation to add Bitcoin (BTC) to its balance sheet.Photo by Michael Förtsch on UnsplashInitial 21 BTC purchaseThe plant-based food products company which operates under the “DayDayCook” brand published a press release via Business Wire last Friday announcing its first Bitcoin purchase. It’s likely that there was a symbolic element to the firm’s first Bitcoin purchase, given that it bought 21 BTC while Bitcoin has a supply cap of 21 million BTC. The company completed the transaction via share exchange with an investor group, issuing 254,333 class A ordinary shares while acquiring the 21 BTC at a market price of $2,283,667. DDC outlined that it plans to make two further purchases over the coming days of 79 BTC, at which point the firm’s corporate treasury will hold 100 BTC. Targeting 5,000 BTCThe company has a much more ambitious Bitcoin accumulation plan, however. Over the course of the next three years, it is targeting the establishment of a Bitcoin treasury holding 5,000 BTC. At current market pricing, that would amount to a Bitcoin treasury of around half a billion dollars in value. In the near term, the firm is targeting the acquisition of 500 BTC by the end of this year. DDC Founder and CEO Norma Chu described the development as a “pivotal moment” in the company’s evolution. She said that this plan reflects DDC’s “confidence in Bitcoin as a store of value,” while demonstrating the firm’s interest in pursuing innovation. “We are fully committed to ensuring the success of this strategy, which aligns with our vision to drive long-term value for our shareholders,” she added. Web3 innovationAccording to a DDC website, the company has innovative plans that go beyond just a Bitcoin treasury. It plans to deepen community engagement through the use of NFT loyalty programs and immersive Web3 experiences. It also plans to leverage blockchain transparency in its efforts to build greater community engagement. The website sets out a vision whereby DDC can blend its culinary heritage with next-generation technologies.  The company suggests that real-world asset (RWA) tokenization has the potential to revolutionize consumer engagement, while offering the possibility of enabling fractional ownership of product lines. It has set out a roadmap where it outlines having established a digital platform in 2012, going on to engage in content creation and content commerce over the course of a decade.  The firm carried out an initial public offering (IPO) in 2023 and from 2025 onwards, aside from its Bitcoin treasury strategy, it plans to integrate RWA tokenization and Web3 technology into its business, while also adopting AI technologies to enhance supply chain efficiency. DDC is one of a growing list of corporations to adopt Bitcoin as a strategic asset over the course of the past 18 months. Earlier this month, another Chinese company, Nasdaq-listed Jiuzi Holdings, an electric vehicle (EV) retailer, announced that it had adopted a plan to acquire 1,000 BTC. Hong Kong-listed game developer Boyaa Interactive holds 3,350 BTC.

Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA), the nation's primary financial regulator, has recently proposed a series of measures aimed at safeguarding users against "unlawful transfers" to cryptocurrency exchanges. This move, however, may pose significant challenges to the peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions market. Bolstering user protection measuresCiting findings from the National Police Agency, which highlight that damages resulting from specialized fraud involving unlawful money transfers are predominantly facilitated through cryptocurrency, the FSA has urged financial institutions to bolster user protection measures. The agency emphasized the importance of assessing risks associated with transfers to crypto-asset exchange service providers. In a request published on Wednesday directed towards Japanese banks, the FSA underscored the persistently high incidence of fraudulent transactions in the country, facilitated through crypto. To address this concern, the FSA and the National Police Agency have proposed various initiatives. One such initiative entails directing banks to enhance monitoring of unlawful transfers to cryptocurrency exchange service providers.Photo by Jayjayli on UnsplashPeer-to-peer (P2P) market implicationsHowever, another proposal from the regulator may have a profound impact on the P2P market. The FSA suggests halting transfers to cryptocurrency exchange service providers if the sender's name differs from the account name. This recommendation, explained in the Japanese version of the press release using the term "reject," implies the suspension of such transfers from both individual and corporate accounts. For users of P2P platforms, where transactions often involve different names between the sender's and receiver's fiat and crypto accounts, this directive could significantly disrupt the market. Rejecting transactions from an individual's bank account to another individual’s crypto wallet could undermine the functionality of P2P transactions. Positive crypto developmentsDespite this potential issue needing to be clarified and resolved and the East Asian nation not having a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies in place, Japan is showing indications of gearing up for broader adoption. The Bank of Japan (BoJ) is preparing to pilot a Japanese central bank digital currency (CBDC) pegged to the Japanese yen.In June of last year, the country established a legal framework for stablecoins. Additionally, the FSA has proposed a legislative amendment to support the development of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) in Japan. The proposed amendment aims to designate potential DAO tokens as "Limited Company Type DAO Employee Rights Tokens," granting holders legal rights akin to regular limited liability company (LLC) members. Last December the Japanese government considered and later acted on revising crypto tax policy to exempt unrealized crypto gains from being taxed. This proposal was originally put forward by the FSA earlier in 2023. In another development, authorities in the city of Kochi signed an agreement on Feb. 7 to virtualize the city on the Start Lands metaverse application, with plans to welcome online tourists later this summer. Despite these most recent recommendations from the FSA potentially signaling a less crypto-friendly stance, the Japanese authorities have otherwise demonstrated that they’re working towards creating workable conditions for the development of crypto and Web3 within the country.

Chinese Court Recognizes Virtual Assets as Legal PropertyAccording to a recent report published by the People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China, a Chinese court has recognized the legal status of virtual assets, having analyzed their attributes within the framework of Chinese criminal law.The court unequivocally stated that virtual assets are considered legal property under the current legal policy framework and are thus protected by law.The People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China exercise judicial power independently, free from interference by administrative or public organizations. They have responsibility for adjudicating civil, criminal, and administrative cases.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashProperty classificationLocal news source Odaily News reported on the development on Friday, indicating that the report, titled “Identification of the Property Attributes of Virtual Currency and Disposal of Property Involved in the Case,” explicitly recognized the economic attributes of virtual assets, leading to their classification as property.This declaration is particularly significant in light of China’s sweeping ban on decentralized cryptocurrencies. Despite this ban, the report argues that virtual assets held by individuals should enjoy legal protection within the existing policy framework.Furthermore, the report proposed recommendations for addressing crimes involving virtual assets. It emphasized that in cases where money and property are involved, confiscation should be based on the integration of criminal and civil law. The approach taken aims to strike a balance between safeguarding personal property rights while also addressing broader social and public interests.Contentious approach to cryptoWhile China has been making every effort to promote its central bank digital currency (CBDC) and the development of blockchain and metaverse-related technology within the country, its stance on decentralized cryptocurrencies has been contentious at best.Its approach in that respect has been marked by a blanket ban on crypto-related activities such as mining and trading and the prohibition of foreign crypto exchanges from serving customers within mainland China. Nevertheless, Chinese courts have consistently taken a more nuanced view without necessarily contradicting the government’s approach.Differing interpretationsThe divergence between national policy and court rulings first emerged in 2019 when the Hangzhou Internet Court found that Bitcoin is a form of virtual property, and on that basis, it is safeguarded by the law from the point of view of property rights. In May 2022, a Shanghai court affirmed that Bitcoin qualifies as virtual property and, as such, falls under the purview of property rights.Global issueIt’s not just the Chinese courts that are grappling with the issue of clarifying property rights relative to virtual assets. In April of this year, a case in Hong Kong involving defunct crypto exchange Gatecoin resulted in the courts determining that cryptocurrency is property and that on that basis, it’s “capable of being held in trust.”In July a Singaporean court determined that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and on that basis, it should be recognized as property. Earlier this year, the High Court of Justice in London recognized non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as property.The report from the People’s Court reaffirms the legal status of virtual assets as protected property under Chinese law. This development highlights the ongoing divergence between China’s regulatory policy and the judicial interpretation of virtual assets, signaling a potential evolution in the country’s approach to cryptocurrencies.